1. Efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced cancer of the vulva: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Schwab R, Schiestl LJ, Cascant Ortolano L, Klecker PH, Schmidt MW, Almstedt K, Heimes AS, Brenner W, Stewen K, Schmidt M, and Hasenburg A
- Abstract
Introduction: Vulvar cancer carries a favourable prognosis in early stages. However, therapeutic options for advanced or recurrent cases are limited despite a variety of therapeutic modalities, such as extensive surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The most important emerging treatment modalities are immune checkpoint inhibitors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in women with advanced vulvar cancer., Materials and Methods: Following a comprehensive search, review, and appraisal, two relevant single-arm studies were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using R4.3.0 software and RStudio 2023.03.0, presenting the overall effect size with a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was assessed using I
2 and the Cochrane Q χ2 statistics., Results: Out of 154 studies screened for eligibility, two single-arm studies involving 119 patients receiving pembrolizumab for advanced vulvar cancer were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was overall 10% (95% CI: 0.00-0.84) and 9% (95% CI: 0.00-0.89) in the PD-L1 positive subgroup. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, 31% (95% CI: 0.04-0.85) exhibited any clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, or stable disease). In the ITT population at six months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 19% (95% CI: 0.01-0.82), and overall survival (OS) was 48% (95% CI: 0.08-0.90). At 12 months, PFS decreased to 9% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85), and OS was 33% (95% CI: 0.04-0.85). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in PFS and OS analyses., Discussion and Conclusion: This study suggests that one-third of women with advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer may, without the influence of PD-L1 status, benefit from pembrolizumab treatment despite a decline in both PFS and OS at 12 months. These findings provide support for considering pembrolizumab in the treatment paradigm for this specific subset of cancer patients., Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023391888., Competing Interests: Author RS received honoraria from Roche Pharma AG, AstraZeneca, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Sanofi GmBH and Streamedup!GmbH. Author AS-H received honoraria from Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Roche Pharma AG, Daiichy Sankyo GmbH, Medupdate GmbH and Streamedup!GmbH. Author KA received speaker honoraria from Roche Pharma AG, Pfizer Pharma GmbH and AstraZeneca. Author KS received honoraria from StreamedUp!GmbH and Sanofi-Aventis GmbH. Author MaS reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pantarhei Bioscience, Pfizer, Roche, and SeaGen outside the submitted work. Institutional research funding from AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Eisai, Genentech, German Breast Group, Novartis, Palleos, Pantarhei Bioscience, Pierre Fabre, and SeaGen. In addition, Marcus Schmidt has a patent for EP 2390370 B1 issued and a patent for EP 2951317 B1 issued. Author AH received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Celgen, GSK, LEO Pharma, MedConcept GmbH, Med update GmbH, Medicultus, Pfizer, Promedicis GmbH, Softconsult, Roche Pharma AG, Streamedup!GmbH, Tesaro Bio Germany GmbH. She is a member of the advisory board of AstraZeneca, GSK, LEO Pharma, PharmaMar, Promedicis GmbH, Roche Pharma AG, Tesaro Bio Germany GmbH, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Schwab, Schiestl, Cascant Ortolano, Klecker, Schmidt, Almstedt, Heimes, Brenner, Stewen, Schmidt and Hasenburg.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF