Search

DNMT3A gene mutations, detected in 20-25% of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, are typically heterozygous. Biallelic variants are uncommon, affecting ~3% of cases and identifying a worse prognosis. Indeed, two concomitant DNMT3A mutations were recently associated with shorter event-free survival and overall survival in AML. We present an AML case bearing an unusual DNMT3A molecular status, strongly affecting its function and strangely impacting the global genomic methylation profile. A 56-year-old Caucasian male with a diagnosis of AML not otherwise specified (NOS) presented a complex DNMT3A molecular profile consisting of four different somatic variants mapping on different alleles (in trans). 3D modelling analysis predicted the effect of the DNMT3A mutational status, showing that all the investigated mutations decreased or abolished DNMT3A activity. Although unexpected, DNMT3A’s severe loss of function resulted in a global genomic hypermethylation in genes generally involved in cell differentiation. The mechanisms through which DNMT3A contributes to AML remain elusive. We present a unique AML case bearing multiple biallelic DNMT3A variants abolishing its activity and resulting in an unexpected global hypermethylation. The unusual DNMT3A behavior described requires a reflection on its role in AML development and persistence, highlighting the heterogeneity of its deregulation.

Background and objectiveThe oncogenic effect of ionizing radiation is widely known. Sarcomas developing after radiation therapy (RT), termed “iatrogenic disease of success”, represent a growing problem, since the advancements in cancer management and screening programs have increased the number of long-term cancer survivors. Although many patients have been treated with radiation therapy, only few data are available on radiation-induced sarcomas (RIS).MethodsWe examined the medical and radiological records of 186 patients with histologically proven soft tissue and bone sarcomas, which referred to IRCCS CROB Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata from January 2009 to May 2022. Among them, seven patients received a histological diagnosis of secondary RIS, according to Cahan’s criteria. Clinicopathological features and treatment follow-up data of RIS patients were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsAmong these secondary RIS, five arose in irradiated breast cancer (5/2,570, 0.19%) and two in irradiated head and neck cancer (2/1,986, 0.10%) patients, with a mean onset latency time of 7.3 years. The histology of RIS was one desmoid tumor, two angiosarcomas, one chondrosarcoma, two leiomyosarcomas, and one undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Out of the seven RIS, one received radiotherapy, one received electrochemotherapy (ECT), one received a second-line chemotherapy, three were subjected to three lines of chemotherapy, and one underwent radiofrequency ablation, chemotherapy, and ECT. Median survival time is 36 months. No significant survival differences were found stratifying patients for age at RT, latency time, and age at RIS diagnosis.ConclusionsRIS represents a possible complication for long-survivor cancer patients. Therefore, adherence to a strict follow-up after the radiation treatment is recommended to allow early diagnosis and optimal management of RIS patients. After the planned follow-up period, considering the long-term risk to develop a RIS, a specific multispecialty survivorship care plan could be of benefit for patients.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are a group of chronic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract in which nationwide studies have revealed a higher risk of hematological malignancies (HMs). Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is a premalignant condition defined by the presence of an acquired somatic mutation characterized by a variant allele frequency (VAF) of ≥2%, in a gene frequently associated with HMs. A growing body of evidence suggests a correlation between inflammation and CH; its occurrence in the context of IBD has been previously demonstrated. With the aim to assess CH possible co-occurrence in patients with an IBD associated with HMs, we performed a targeted next-generation sequencing analysis in a cohort of thirteen patients who were referred to our center with IBD associated with HMs. Eleven (85%) patients showed one or more mutations in CH-associated genes; DNMT3A was the most frequently mutated gene, followed by ASXL1 and JAK2. These results may suggest that the mechanisms at the basis of the inflammatory environment could potentially select for the growth of hematopoietic clones harboring specific mutations. In this context, CH emergence may be boosted by the proinflammatory IBD environment, thus acting as a biological link between IBD and the HM onset. If these data are confirmed, IBD patients screened and positive for CH should undergo a hematologic follow-up to assess the risk of developing HM. Future study will clarify the relationship between these conditions.

An observational prospective study was conducted by the CML Italian network to analyze the role of baseline patient characteristics and first line treatments on overall survival and CML-related mortality in 1206 newly diagnosed CML patients, 608 treated with imatinib (IMA) and 598 with 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2GTKI). IMA-treated patients were much older (median age 69 years, IQR 58-77) than the 2GTKI group (52, IQR 41-63) and had more comorbidities. Estimated 4-year overall survival of the entire cohort was 89% (95%CI 85.9-91.4). Overall, 73 patients (6.1%) died: 17 (2.8%) in the 2GTKI vs 56 (9.2%) in the IMA cohort (adjusted HR=0.50; 95% CI=0.26-0.94), but no differences were detected for CML-related mortality (10 (1.7%) vs 11 (1.8%) in the 2GTKIs vs IMA cohort (sHR=1.61; 0.52-4.96). The ELTS score was associated to CML mortality (high risk vs low, HR=9.67; 95%CI 2.94-31.74; p

Achievement of deep molecular response following treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) allows for treatment-free remission (TFR) in many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Successful TFR is defined as the achievement of a sustained molecular response after cessation of ongoing TKI therapy. The phase 3 ENESTPath study was designed to determine the required optimal duration of consolidation treatment with the second-generation TKI, nilotinib 300 mg twice-daily, to remain in successful TFR without relapse after entering TFR for 12 months. The purpose of this Italian ‘patient’s voice CML’ substudy was to evaluate patients’ psycho-emotional characteristics and quality of life through their experiences of stopping treatment with nilotinib and entering TFR. The purpose of the present contribution is to early present the study protocol of an ongoing study to the scientific community, in order to describe the study rationale and to extensively present the study methodology. Patients aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome positive BCR-ABL1+ CML in chronic phase and treated with front-line imatinib for a minimum of 24 months from the enrollment were eligible. Patients consenting to participate the substudy will have quality of life questionnaires and in-depth qualitative interviews conducted. The substudy will include both qualitative and quantitative design aspects to evaluate the psychological outcomes as assessed via patients’ emotional experience during and after stopping nilotinib therapy. Randomization is hypothesized to be a timepoint of higher psychological alert or distress when compared to consolidation and additionally any improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to nilotinib treatment is expected across the timepoints (from consolidation, to randomization, and TFR). An association is also expected between dysfunctional coping strategies, such as detachments and certain personality traits, and psychological distress and HRQoL impairments. Better HRQoL outcomes are expected in TFR compared to the end of consolidation. This substudy is designed for in-depth assessment of all potential psycho-emotional variables and aims to determine the need for personalized patient care and counselling, and also guide clinicians to consider the psychological well-being of patients who are considering treatment termination.NCT number: NCT01743989, EudraCT number: 2012-005124-15