1. Outcome of emergency neurosurgery in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
- Author
-
Farbod Niazi, Aline Han, Lauren Stamm, Nathan A. Shlobin, Catherine Korman, Thien S. Hoang, Agnieszka Kielian, Genevieve Du Pont-Thibodeau, Laurence Ducharme Crevier, Philippe Major, Dang K. Nguyen, Alain Bouthillier, George M. Ibrahim, Aria Fallah, Aristides Hadjinicolaou, and Alexander G. Weil
- Subjects
refractory status epilepctius (RSE) ,super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) ,neuromodulation ,epilepsy surgery ,status epilepticus ,Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system ,RC346-429 - Abstract
BackgroundRefractory (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) are serious neurological conditions requiring aggressive management. Beyond anesthetic agents, there is a lack of evidence guiding management in these patients. This systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) seeks to evaluate and compare the currently available surgical techniques for the acute treatment of RSE and SRSE.MethodsA systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Individual Participant Data (PRISMA-IPD). Only patients who underwent surgery while in RSE and SRSE were included. Descriptive statistics were used to compare various subgroups. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of status epilepticus (SE) cessation, long-term overall seizure freedom, and favorable functional outcome (i.e., modified Rankin score of 0–2) at last follow-up.ResultsA total of 87 studies including 161 participants were included. Resective surgery tended to achieve better SE cessation rate (93.9%) compared to non-resective techniques (83.9%), but this did not reach significance (p = 0.071). Resective techniques were also more likely to achieve seizure freedom (69.1% vs. 34.4%, p =
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF