Search

Introduction: Small studies have suggested that eptifibatide (EPT) may be safe in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) following intravenous thrombolysis or during endovascular therapy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, studies are called upon to better delineate the safety of EPT use during EVT. Methods: A comprehensive stroke center registry (09/2015-12/2020) of consecutive adults who had undergone EVT for anterior LVO was queried. Patients treated with EPT were matched with 2 control groups based on known factors associated with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) risk - age, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), and number of thrombectomy passes. Safety outcomes (intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], parenchymal hematoma [PH-2] grade hemorrhagic transformation, symptomatic ICH [sICH]) and efficacy outcomes (TICI 2B/3 recanalization, 24-h National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score), were compared between matched groups using descriptive statistics. In addition, multivariable logistic regression was used to assess for an association between EPT and PH-1/PH-2 grade hemorrhages. Results: A total of 162 patients were included, 54 of whom (33%) received EPT. The rate of ICH was similar between groups (p = 0.62), while PH-2 was significantly more frequent with EPT (16.7% EPT vs. 3.7 vs. 1.9%; p = 0.009), but without significant differences in sICH (5.6% EPT vs. 7.4 vs. 3.7%; p = 0.72). Rates of TICI Score ≥ 2B were nominally higher with EPT use (83.3 vs. 77.8 vs. 77.8%, p = 0.70). Between the EPT and control groups, there were no differences in 24-h NIHSS (p = 0.09) or 90-day mortality (p = 0.58). Our adjusted multivariate analysis identified that the number of passes (p < 0.01), EPT use (p < 0.01), and tandem occlusion (p = 0.03) were independent predictors of PH1/PH2 grade hemorrhage. Additionally, every unit increase in number of passes resulted in a 1.5 times greater odds of a high-grade hemorrhagic transformation in EPT-treated patients (adjusted OR = 1.594). Conclusion: In this single-center analysis, EPT use during EVT was associated with a significantly higher rate of PH1/PH2 grade hemorrhages, but not with differences in sICH, 24-h NIHSS, or 90-day mortality. Randomized prospective trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of EPT in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionSmall studies have suggested that eptifibatide (EPT) may be safe in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) following intravenous thrombolysis or during endovascular therapy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, studies are called upon to better delineate the safety of EPT use during EVT.MethodsA comprehensive stroke center registry (09/2015-12/2020) of consecutive adults who had undergone EVT for anterior LVO was queried. Patients treated with EPT were matched with 2 control groups based on known factors associated with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) risk - age, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), and number of thrombectomy passes. Safety outcomes (intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], parenchymal hematoma [PH-2] grade hemorrhagic transformation, symptomatic ICH [sICH]) and efficacy outcomes (TICI 2B/3 recanalization, 24-h National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score), were compared between matched groups using descriptive statistics. In addition, multivariable logistic regression was used to assess for an association between EPT and PH-1/PH-2 grade hemorrhages.ResultsA total of 162 patients were included, 54 of whom (33%) received EPT. The rate of ICH was similar between groups (p = 0.62), while PH-2 was significantly more frequent with EPT (16.7% EPT vs. 3.7 vs. 1.9%; p = 0.009), but without significant differences in sICH (5.6% EPT vs. 7.4 vs. 3.7%; p = 0.72). Rates of TICI Score ≥ 2B were nominally higher with EPT use (83.3 vs. 77.8 vs. 77.8%, p = 0.70). Between the EPT and control groups, there were no differences in 24-h NIHSS (p = 0.09) or 90-day mortality (p = 0.58). Our adjusted multivariate analysis identified that the number of passes (p < 0.01), EPT use (p < 0.01), and tandem occlusion (p = 0.03) were independent predictors of PH1/PH2 grade hemorrhage. Additionally, every unit increase in number of passes resulted in a 1.5 times greater odds of a high-grade hemorrhagic transformation in EPT-treated patients (adjusted OR = 1.594).ConclusionIn this single-center analysis, EPT use during EVT was associated with a significantly higher rate of PH1/PH2 grade hemorrhages, but not with differences in sICH, 24-h NIHSS, or 90-day mortality. Randomized prospective trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of EPT in this population.

Objectives: Our primary objective was to determine the successful rate of recanalization of M1 large vessel occlusion using either the Trevo 4 × 30 mm or 6 × 25 mm stent during mechanical thrombectomy. Our secondary objectives were to determine differences between the use of these two stent retrievers regarding first-pass effect, periprocedural complications, and mortality in the first 90 days. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data regarding the stent used, recanalization, number of passes, periprocedural complications, and mortality were determined via our mechanical thrombectomy database along with chart review. Conclusion: When comparing Trevo 4 × 30 mm to 6 × 25 mm stent retrievers used in mechanical thrombectomy for middle cerebral artery large-vessel occlusion causing stroke, there is no statistically significant difference in successful recanalization rates, first-pass effect, perioperative complications, or mortality at 90 days. Studies like this will hopefully lead to further prospective, randomized controlled trials that will help show experts in the field an additional way to perform this procedure effectively and safely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) can be technically challenging. Devices and tools are rapidly evolving. We aimed to gain insight into preferences and global perspectives on the usage of endovascular tools in treating MeVOs. Methods: We conducted an international survey with seven scenarios of patients presenting A3, M2/3, M3, M3/4, or P2/3 occlusions. Respondents were asked for their preferred first-line endovascular approach, and whether they felt that the appropriate endovascular tools were available to them. Answers were analyzed by occlusion location and geographical region of practice, using multinomial/binary logistic regression. Results: A total of 263 neurointerventionists provided 1836 responses. The first-line preferences of physicians were evenly distributed among stent-retrievers, combined approaches, and aspiration only (33.2, 29.8, and 26.8%, respectively). A3 occlusions were more often treated with stent-retrievers (RR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07–1.36), while intra-arterial thrombolysis was more often preferred in M3 (RR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.53–3.98) and M3/4 occlusions (RR 7.71, 95% CI: 4.16–14.28) compared to M2/3 occlusions. Respondents who thought appropriate tools are currently not available more often chose stent retrievers alone (RR 2.07; 95% CI: 1.01–4.24) or intra-arterial thrombolysis (RR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.26–8.42). Physicians who stated that they do not have access to optimal tools opted more often not to treat at all (RR 3.41, 95% CI: 1.11–10.49). Stent-retrievers alone were chosen more often and contact aspiration alone less often as a first-line approach in Europe (RR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.38–3.24; and RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34–0.70, respectively) compared to the United States and Canada. Conclusions: In EVT for MeVO strokes, neurointerventionalists choose a targeted vessel specific first-line approach depending on the occlusion location, region of practice, and availability of the appropriate tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Our primary objective was to determine the successful rate of recanalization of M1 large vessel occlusion using either the Trevo 4 × 30 mm or 6 × 25 mm stent during mechanical thrombectomy. Our secondary objectives were to determine differences between the use of these two stent retrievers regarding first-pass effect, periprocedural complications, and mortality in the first 90 days.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data regarding the stent used, recanalization, number of passes, periprocedural complications, and mortality were determined via our mechanical thrombectomy database along with chart review.Conclusion: When comparing Trevo 4 × 30 mm to 6 × 25 mm stent retrievers used in mechanical thrombectomy for middle cerebral artery large-vessel occlusion causing stroke, there is no statistically significant difference in successful recanalization rates, first-pass effect, perioperative complications, or mortality at 90 days. Studies like this will hopefully lead to further prospective, randomized controlled trials that will help show experts in the field an additional way to perform this procedure effectively and safely.

The management of acute neurological conditions, particularly acute ischemic stroke, in the context of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is of importance, considering the risk of infection to the healthcare workers and patients and emerging evidence of the neuroinvasive potential of the virus. There are variations in expert guidelines further complicating the picture for clinicians in acute settings. In this light, there is a compelling need for further formulation of recommendations that compile these variations seen in the numerous guidelines present. Health system protocols for managing ongoing acute neurological care and intervention need consideration of safety and well-being of the frontline healthcare workers and the patients. We examine existing pathways and their efficacy to mitigate viral exposure to the healthcare workers and patients and synthesize a systemic approach to manage patients with acute neurological conditions in the COVID-19 scenario. Early experiences with a COVID-19 positive stroke patient treated with endovascular thrombectomy is presented to highlight the urgent need for adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) during acute neuro-interventional procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has led to immense strain on healthcare systems and workers. Patients with severe symptoms of COVID-19 may also present with acute neurological emergencies such as ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke in these patients may result from COVID-19 related complications or decompensation of previously asymptomatic cerebrovascular disorders, or concurrent ischemic stroke from common stroke risk factors in a patient with COVID-19. Acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions require emergent triage, intensive care, and mechanical thrombectomy. Management of patients with large vessel occlusions (LVO) requires special considerations in the current pandemic. Physicians must now account for prognosis of severe COVID-19, resource utilization, and risk of infection to healthcare workers when determining eligibility for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Here, we describe important prognostic factors including age, laboratory, and imaging findings to consider for MT selection and provide suggestions for taking care of patients with LVO and possible or confirmed COVID-19. It is recommended to perform MT in patients within the established guidelines, and consider a conservative approach in cases where there is clinical equipoise to minimize futile reperfusion. Lastly, we describe an illustrative case of a patient with ischemic stroke and COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We review the methods and results of SAMMPRIS and provide a critical review of its strengths and limitations. In SAMMPRIS, the aggressive medical treatment arm (AMT arm) did substantially better than the Wingspan Stenting plus aggressive medical management arm (WS+ arm). Complications in the first 30 days post intervention led to the disparity between treatment arms. A major contribution of SAMMPRIS was the added value that AMT and lifestyle change may provide, when compared to a precursor trial, WASID, designed to prevent stroke in persons with high-grade symptomatic intracranial occlusive disease, however, the results of neither of these two trials has ever been reproduced. On the other hand we argue that technical limitations of the Wingspan stent system (WS System) and lack of an angioplasty only intervention arm may have led to a premature launch of the trial and early termination of the study. Future randomized trials with different devices and modified patient selection criteria are warranted.

We review the methods and results of Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke (SAMMPRIS) and provide a critical review of its strengths and limitations. In SAMMPRIS, the aggressive medical treatment arm (AMT arm) did substantially better than the Wingspan Stenting plus aggressive medical management arm (WSC arm). Complications in the first 30 days post intervention led to the disparity between treatment arms. A major contribution of SAMMPRIS was the added value that AMT and lifestyle change may provide, when compared to a precursor trial,Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID), designed to prevent stroke in persons with high-grade symptomatic intracranial occlusive disease, however, the results of neither of these two trials have ever been reproduced. On the other hand, we argue that technical limitations of the Wingspan stent system (WS System) and lack of an angioplasty only intervention arm may have led to a premature launch of the trial and early termination of the study. Future randomized trials with different devices and modified patient selection criteria are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antiplatelet resistance is emerging as significant factor in effective secondary stroke prevention. Prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance is dependent upon laboratory test and remains contentious. Large studies in cardiovascular disease populations have demonstrated worse ischemic outcomes in patients with antiplatelet resistance, particularly in patients with coronary stents. Thromboembolism is a complication of neurointerventional procedures that leads to stroke. Stroke rates related to aneurysm coiling range from 2 to 10% and may be higher when considering silent ischemia. Stroke associated with carotid stenting is a major cause of morbidity. Antiplatelet use in the periprocedure setting varies among different centers. No guidelines exist for use of antiplatelet regimens in neurointerventional procedures. Incidence of stroke in patients post procedure may be partly explained by resistance to antiplatelet agents. Further research is required to establish the incidence of stroke in patients with antiplatelet resistance undergoing neurointerventional procedures

Antiplatelet resistance is emerging as a significant factor in effective secondary stroke prevention. Prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance is dependent upon laboratory test and remains contentious. Large studies in cardiovascular disease populations have demonstrated worse ischemic outcomes in patients with antiplatelet resistance, particularly in patients with coronary stents. Thromboembolism is a complication of neurointerventional procedures that leads to stroke. Stroke rates related to aneurysm coiling range from 2 to 10% and may be higher when considering silent ischemia. Stroke associated with carotid stenting is a major cause of morbidity. Antiplatelet use in the periprocedure setting varies among different centers. No guidelines exist for use of antiplatelet regimens in neurointerventional procedures. Incidence of stroke in patients post procedure may be partly explained by resistance to antiplatelet agents. Further research is required to establish the incidence of stroke in patients with antiplatelet resistance undergoing neurointerventional procedures.