Search

Hyperkalemia is a well-recognized electrolyte abnormality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Potassium binders are often used to prevent and treat hyperkalemia. However, few studies have evaluated the difference in serum potassium (K+) level-lowering effect during the post-acute phase between the novel potassium binder, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZSC), and conventional agents. This retrospective study included patients who received potassium binders (either ZSC or calcium polystyrene sulfonate [CPS]) in our hospital between May 2020 and July 2022. The patients were divided into the ZSC and CPS groups. After propensity score matching, we compared changes from baseline to the first follow-up point, at least 4 weeks after initiating potassium binders, in electrolytes including K+ level between the two groups. Of the 132 patients, ZSC and CPS were administered in 48 and 84 patients, respectively. After matching, 38 patients were allocated to each group. The ZSC group showed greater reduction in K+ levels than did the CPS group (P < 0.05). Moreover, a significant increase in serum sodium minus chloride levels, a surrogate marker for metabolic acidosis, was observed in the ZSC group (P < 0.05). Our results demonstrated that ZSC could potentially improve hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis in patients with CKD.

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a systemic and polyclonal lymphoproliferative disease involving multiple organs, including the kidneys, due to the overproduction of interleukin-6 (IL-6). Recently, several reports have suggested that excessive IL-6 actions in iMCD could have a causal relationship with the development of diverse histopathological renal manifestations that cause nephrotic syndrome. However, the treatment for such cases remains unclear. We report a series of three cases of nephrotic syndrome due to iMCD that helps to delineate the importance of early and continuous therapy with the anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab. First, treatment was suspended for infectious control, and the patient presented with nephrotic syndrome due to diffuse mesangial and endocapillary hypercellularity without immune deposits complicating acute kidney injury. Second, iMCD was treated with prednisolone alone. The patient suddenly developed nephrotic syndrome due to immune-complex glomerulonephritis, not otherwise specified, complicated with acute kidney injury. In the third case, nephrotic syndrome secondary to membranous glomerulonephritis was diagnosed, with a skin rash and IgE antibodies to tocilizumab, and was therefore treated with prednisolone alone. In contrast to the first two cases, the third progressed to end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis. Taken together, this series suggests that clinicians should maintain clinical vigilance for iMCD as a possible underlying component of nephrotic syndrome, since iMCD presents with a variety of renal pathologies. Prompt initiation and continuous administration of tocilizumab are likely key determinants of renal outcomes in such cases. In particular, when tocilizumab is suspended due to infection or in the perioperative period, consideration of its expeditious resumption should be made, taking into account both the withdrawal period and systemic conditions.

Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues and a new variant of the virus has emerged, the COVID-19 vaccination campaign has progressed. Rare but severe adverse outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination such as anaphylaxis and myocarditis have begun to be noticed. Of note, several cases of new-onset antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination have been reported. However, relapse of AAV in remission has not been recognized enough as an adverse outcome of COVID-19 vaccination. We report, to our knowledge, a first case of renal-limited AAV in remission using every 6-month rituximab administration that relapsed with pulmonary hemorrhage, but not glomerulonephritis, following the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The patient received the COVID-19 vaccine more than 6 months after the last dose of rituximab according to the recommendations. However, his CD19+ B cell counts were found to be increased after admission, indicating that our case might have been prone to relapse after COVID-19 vaccination. Although our case cannot establish causality between AAV relapse and COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, a high level of clinical vigilance for relapse of AAV especially in patients undergoing rituximab maintenance therapy following COVID-19 vaccination should be maintained. Furthermore, elapsed time between rituximab administration and COVID-19 mRNA vaccination should be carefully adjusted based on AAV disease-activity.