Search

Introduction: Immunogenicity, the unwanted immune response triggered by therapeutic antibodies, poses significant challenges in biotherapeutic development. This response can lead to the production of anti-drug antibodies, potentially compromising the efficacy and safety of treatments. The internalization of therapeutic antibodies into dendritic cells (DCs) is a critical factor influencing immunogenicity. Using monoclonal antibodies, with differences in non-specific cellular uptake, as tools to explore the impact on the overall risk of immunogenicity, this study explores how internalization influences peptide presentation and subsequently T cell activation. Materials and methods: To investigate the impact of antibody internalization on immunogenicity, untargeted toolantibodies with engineered positive or negative charge patches were utilized. Immature monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs), known for their physiologically relevant high endocytic activity, were employed for internalization assays, while mature moDCs were used for MHC-II associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs) assays. In addition to the lysosomal accumulation and peptide presentation, subsequent CD4+ T cell activation has been assessed. Consequently, a known CD4+ T cell epitope from ovalbumin was inserted into the tool antibodies to evaluate T cell activation on a single, shared epitope. Results: Antibodies with positive charge patches exhibited higher rates of lysosomal accumulation and epitope presentation compared to those with negative charge patches or neutral surface charge. Furthermore, a direct correlation between internalization rate and presentation on MHC-II molecules could be established. To explore the link between internalization, peptide presentation and CD4+ T cell activation, tool antibodies containing the same OVA epitope were used. Previous observations were not altered by the insertion of the OVA epitope and ultimately, an enhanced CD4+ T cell response correlated with increased internalization in DCs and peptide presentation. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that the biophysical properties of therapeutic antibodies, particularly surface charge, play a crucial role in their internalization into DCs. Antibodies internalized faster and processed by DCs, are also more prone to be presented on their surface leading to a higher risk of triggering an immune response. These insights underscore the importance of considering antibody surface charge and other properties that enhance cellular accumulation during the preclinical development of biotherapeutics to mitigate immunogenicity risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Immunogenicity refers to the ability of a substance, such as a therapeutic drug, to elicit an immune response. While beneficial in vaccine development, undesirable immunogenicity can compromise the safety and efficacy of therapeutic proteins by inducing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). These ADAs can reduce drug bioavailability and alter pharmacokinetics, necessitating comprehensive immunogenicity risk assessments starting at early stages of drug development. Given the complexity of immunogenicity, an integrated approach is essential, as no single assay can universally recapitulate the immune response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies. Methods: To better understand the Dendritic Cell (DC) contribution to immunogenicity, we developed two flow cytometry-based assays: the DC internalization assay and the DC activation assay. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and differentiated over a five-day period. The internalization assay measured the accumulation rate of therapeutic antibodies within moDCs, while the activation assay assessed the expression of DC activationmarkers such as CD40, CD80, CD86, CD83, and DC-SIGN (CD209). To characterize these two assays further, we used a set of marketed therapeutic antibodies. Results: The study highlights that moDCs differentiated for 5 days from freshly isolated monocytes were more prone to respond to external stimuli. The internalization assay has been shown to be highly sensitive to the molecule tested, allowing the use of only 4 donors to detect small but significant differences. We also demonstrated that therapeutic antibodies were efficiently taken up by moDCs, with a strong correlation with their peptide presentation on MHC-II. On the other hand, by monitoring DC activation through a limited set of activation markers including CD40, CD83, and DC-SIGN, the DC activation assay has the potential to compare a series of compounds. These two assays provide a more comprehensive understanding of DC function in the context of immunogenicity, highlighting the importance of both internalization and activation processes in ADA development. Discussion: The DC internalization and activation assays described here address key gaps in existing immunogenicity assessment methods by providing specific and reliable measures of DC function. The assays enhance our ability to pre-clinically evaluate the immunogenic potential of biotherapeutics, thereby improving their safety and efficacy. Future work should focus on further validating these assays and integrating them into a holistic immunogenicity risk assessment framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionImmunogenicity, the unwanted immune response triggered by therapeutic antibodies, poses significant challenges in biotherapeutic development. This response can lead to the production of anti-drug antibodies, potentially compromising the efficacy and safety of treatments. The internalization of therapeutic antibodies into dendritic cells (DCs) is a critical factor influencing immunogenicity. Using monoclonal antibodies, with differences in non-specific cellular uptake, as tools to explore the impact on the overall risk of immunogenicity, this study explores how internalization influences peptide presentation and subsequently T cell activation.Materials and methodsTo investigate the impact of antibody internalization on immunogenicity, untargeted toolantibodies with engineered positive or negative charge patches were utilized. Immature monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs), known for their physiologically relevant high endocytic activity, were employed for internalization assays, while mature moDCs were used for MHC-II associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs) assays. In addition to the lysosomal accumulation and peptide presentation, subsequent CD4+ T cell activation has been assessed. Consequently, a known CD4+ T cell epitope from ovalbumin was inserted into the tool antibodies to evaluate T cell activation on a single, shared epitope.ResultsAntibodies with positive charge patches exhibited higher rates of lysosomal accumulation and epitope presentation compared to those with negative charge patches or neutral surface charge. Furthermore, a direct correlation between internalization rate and presentation on MHC-II molecules could be established. To explore the link between internalization, peptide presentation and CD4+ T cell activation, tool antibodies containing the same OVA epitope were used. Previous observations were not altered by the insertion of the OVA epitope and ultimately, an enhanced CD4+ T cell response correlated with increased internalization in DCs and peptide presentation.DiscussionThese findings demonstrate that the biophysical properties of therapeutic antibodies, particularly surface charge, play a crucial role in their internalization into DCs. Antibodies internalized faster and processed by DCs, are also more prone to be presented on their surface leading to a higher risk of triggering an immune response. These insights underscore the importance of considering antibody surface charge and other properties that enhance cellular accumulation during the preclinical development of biotherapeutics to mitigate immunogenicity risks.

IntroductionImmunogenicity refers to the ability of a substance, such as a therapeutic drug, to elicit an immune response. While beneficial in vaccine development, undesirable immunogenicity can compromise the safety and efficacy of therapeutic proteins by inducing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). These ADAs can reduce drug bioavailability and alter pharmacokinetics, necessitating comprehensive immunogenicity risk assessments starting at early stages of drug development. Given the complexity of immunogenicity, an integrated approach is essential, as no single assay can universally recapitulate the immune response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies.MethodsTo better understand the Dendritic Cell (DC) contribution to immunogenicity, we developed two flow cytometry-based assays: the DC internalization assay and the DC activation assay. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and differentiated over a five-day period. The internalization assay measured the accumulation rate of therapeutic antibodies within moDCs, while the activation assay assessed the expression of DC activation markers such as CD40, CD80, CD86, CD83, and DC-SIGN (CD209). To characterize these two assays further, we used a set of marketed therapeutic antibodies.ResultsThe study highlights that moDCs differentiated for 5 days from freshly isolated monocytes were more prone to respond to external stimuli. The internalization assay has been shown to be highly sensitive to the molecule tested, allowing the use of only 4 donors to detect small but significant differences. We also demonstrated that therapeutic antibodies were efficiently taken up by moDCs, with a strong correlation with their peptide presentation on MHC-II. On the other hand, by monitoring DC activation through a limited set of activation markers including CD40, CD83, and DC-SIGN, the DC activation assay has the potential to compare a series of compounds. These two assays provide a more comprehensive understanding of DC function in the context of immunogenicity, highlighting the importance of both internalization and activation processes in ADA development.DiscussionThe DC internalization and activation assays described here address key gaps in existing immunogenicity assessment methods by providing specific and reliable measures of DC function. The assays enhance our ability to pre-clinically evaluate the immunogenic potential of biotherapeutics, thereby improving their safety and efficacy. Future work should focus on further validating these assays and integrating them into a holistic immunogenicity risk assessment framework.

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-Associated Peptide Proteomics (MAPPs) is an ex vivo method used to assess the immunogenicity risk of biotherapeutics. MAPPs can identify potential T-cell epitopes within the biotherapeutic molecule. Using adalimumab treated human monocyte derived dendritic cells (DCs) and a pan anti-HLA-DR antibody (Ab), we systematically automated and optimized biotin/streptavidin (SA)-capture antibody coupling, lysate incubation with capture antibody, as well as the washing and elution steps of a MAPPs method using functionalized magnetic beads and a KingFisher Magnetic Particle processor. Automation of these steps, combined with capturing using biotinylated-Ab/SA magnetic beads rather than covalently bound antibody, improved reproducibility as measured by minimal inter-and intra-day variability, as well as minimal analyst-to-analyst variability. The semiautomated MAPPs workflow improved sensitivity, allowing for a lower number of cells per analysis. The method was assessed using five different biotherapeutics with varying immunogenicity rates ranging from 0.1 to 48% ADA incidence in the clinic. Biotherapeutics with ≥10%immunogenicity incidence consistently presented more peptides (1.8-28 fold) and clusters (10-21 fold) compared to those with <10% immunogenicity incidence. Our semi-automated MAPPs method provided two main advantages over a manual workflow- the robustness and reproducibility affords confidence in the epitopes identified from as few as 5 to 10 donors and the method workflow can be readily adapted to incorporate different capture Abs in addition to anti-HLA-DR. The incorporation of semi-automated MAPPs with biotinylated-Ab/SA bead-based capture in immunogenicity screening strategies allows the generation of more consistent and reliable data, helping to improve immunogenicity prediction capabilities in drug development. MHC associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs), Immunogenicity risk assessment, in vitro/ex vivo, biotherapeutics, Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II (MHC II), LC-MS, Immunoaffinity Capture, streptavidin magnetic beads [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-Associated Peptide Proteomics (MAPPs) is an ex vivo method used to assess the immunogenicity risk of biotherapeutics. MAPPs can identify potential T-cell epitopes within the biotherapeutic molecule. Using adalimumab treated human monocyte derived dendritic cells (DCs) and a pan anti-HLA-DR antibody (Ab), we systematically automated and optimized biotin/streptavidin (SA)-capture antibody coupling, lysate incubation with capture antibody, as well as the washing and elution steps of a MAPPs method using functionalized magnetic beads and a KingFisher Magnetic Particle processor. Automation of these steps, combined with capturing using biotinylated-Ab/SA magnetic beads rather than covalently bound antibody, improved reproducibility as measured by minimal inter-and intra-day variability, as well as minimal analyst-to-analyst variability. The semi-automated MAPPs workflow improved sensitivity, allowing for a lower number of cells per analysis. The method was assessed using five different biotherapeutics with varying immunogenicity rates ranging from 0.1 to 48% ADA incidence in the clinic. Biotherapeutics with ≥10%immunogenicity incidence consistently presented more peptides (1.8-28 fold) and clusters (10-21 fold) compared to those with

The emerging field of biotherapeutics provides successful treatments for various diseases, yet immunogenicity and limited efficacy remain major concerns for many products. Glycosylation is a key factor determining the pharmacological properties of biotherapeutics, including their stability, solubility, bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Hence, an increased attention is directed at optimizing the glycosylation properties of biotherapeutics. Currently, most biotherapeutics are produced in non-human mammalian cells in light of their ability to produce human-like glycosylation. However, most mammals produce the sialic acid N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), while humans cannot due to a specific genetic defect. Humans consume Neu5Gc in their diet from mammalian derived foods (red meat and dairy) and produce polyclonal antibodies against diverse Neu5Gc-glycans. Moreover, Neu5Gc can metabolically incorporate into human cells and become presented on surface or secreted glycans, glycoproteins, and glycolipids. Several studies in mice suggested that the combination of Neu5Gc-containing epitopes and anti-Neu5Gc antibodies could contribute to exacerbation of chronic inflammation-mediated diseases (e.g., cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and autoimmunity). This could potentially become complicated with exposure to Neu5Gc-containing biotherapeutics, bio-devices or xenografts. Indeed, Neu5Gc can be found on various approved and marketed biotherapeutics. Here, we provide a perspective review on the possible consequences of Neu5Gc glycosylation of therapeutic protein drugs due to the limited published evidence of Neu5Gc glycosylation on marketed biotherapeutics and studies on their putative effects on immunogenicity, drug efficacy, and safety.

The emerging field of biotherapeutics provides successful treatments for various diseases, yet immunogenicity and limited efficacy remain major concerns for many products. Glycosylation is a key factor determining the pharmacological properties of biotherapeutics, including their stability, solubility, bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Hence, an increased attention is directed at optimizing the glycosylation properties of biotherapeutics. Currently, most biotherapeutics are produced in non-human mammalian cells in light of their ability to produce human-like glycosylation. However, most mammals produce the sialic acid N -glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), while humans cannot due to a specific genetic defect. Humans consume Neu5Gc in their diet from mammalian derived foods (red meat and dairy) and produce polyclonal antibodies against diverse Neu5Gc-glycans. Moreover, Neu5Gc can metabolically incorporate into human cells and become presented on surface or secreted glycans, glycoproteins, and glycolipids. Several studies in mice suggested that the combination of Neu5Gc-containing epitopes and anti-Neu5Gc antibodies could contribute to exacerbation of chronic inflammation-mediated diseases (e.g., cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and autoimmunity). This could potentially become complicated with exposure to Neu5Gc-containing biotherapeutics, bio-devices or xenografts. Indeed, Neu5Gc can be found on various approved and marketed biotherapeutics. Here, we provide a perspective review on the possible consequences of Neu5Gc glycosylation of therapeutic protein drugs due to the limited published evidence of Neu5Gc glycosylation on marketed biotherapeutics and studies on their putative effects on immunogenicity, drug efficacy, and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biological molecules are increasingly becoming a part of the therapeutics portfolio that has been either recently approved for marketing or those that are in the pipeline of several biotech and pharmaceutical companies. This is largely based on their ability to be highly specific relative to small molecules. However, by virtue of being a large protein, and having a complex structure with structural variability arising from production using recombinant gene technology in cell lines, such therapeutics run the risk of being recognized as foreign by a host immune system. In the context of immune-mediated adverse effects that have been documented to biological drugs thus far, including infusion reactions, and the evolving therapeutic platforms in the pipeline that engineer different functional modules in a biotherapeutic, it is critical to understand the interplay of the adaptive and innate immune responses, the pathophysiology of immunogenicity to biological drugs in instances where there have been immune-mediated adverse clinical sequelae and address technical approaches for their laboratory evaluation. The current paradigm in immunogenicity evaluation has a tiered approach to the detection and characterization of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) elicited in vivo to a biotherapeutic; alongside with the structural, biophysical, and molecular information of the therapeutic, these analytical assessments form the core of the immunogenicity risk assessment. However, many of the immune-mediated adverse effects attributed to ADAs require the formation of a drug/ADA immune complex (IC) intermediate that can have a variety of downstream effects. This review will focus on the activation of potential immunopathological pathways arising as a consequence of circulating as well as cell surface bound drug bearing ICs, risk factors that are intrinsic either to the therapeutic molecule or to the host that might predispose to IC-mediated effects, and review the recent literature on prevalence and intensity of established examples of type II and III hypersensitivity reactions that follow the administration of a biotherapeutic. Additionally, we propose methods for the study of immune parameters specific to the biology of ICs that could be of use in conjunction with the detection of ADAs in circulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunogenicity against biotherapeutic proteins (BPs) and the potential outcome for the patient are difficult to predict. In vitro assays that can help to assess the immunogenic potential of BPs are not yet used routinely during drug development. MAPPs (MHC-associated peptide proteomics) is one of the assays best characterized regarding its value for immunogenicity potential assessment. This review is focusing on recent studies that have employed human HLA class II-MAPPs assays to rank biotherapeutic candidates, investigate clinical immunogenicity, and understand mechanistic root causes of immunogenicity. Advantages and challenges of the technology are discussed as well as the different areas of application., (Copyright © 2020 Karle.)

Biological molecules are increasingly becoming a part of the therapeutics portfolio that has been either recently approved for marketing or those that are in the pipeline of several biotech and pharmaceutical companies. This is largely based on their ability to be highly specific relative to small molecules. However, by virtue of being a large protein, and having a complex structure with structural variability arising from production using recombinant gene technology in cell lines, such therapeutics run the risk of being recognized as foreign by a host immune system. In the context of immune-mediated adverse effects that have been documented to biological drugs thus far, including infusion reactions, and the evolving therapeutic platforms in the pipeline that engineer different functional modules in a biotherapeutic, it is critical to understand the interplay of the adaptive and innate immune responses, the pathophysiology of immunogenicity to biological drugs in instances where there have been immune-mediated adverse clinical sequelae and address technical approaches for their laboratory evaluation. The current paradigm in immunogenicity evaluation has a tiered approach to the detection and characterization of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) elicited in vivo to a biotherapeutic; alongside with the structural, biophysical, and molecular information of the therapeutic, these analytical assessments form the core of the immunogenicity risk assessment. However, many of the immune-mediated adverse effects attributed to ADAs require the formation of a drug/ADA immune complex (IC) intermediate that can have a variety of downstream effects. This review will focus on the activation of potential immunopathological pathways arising as a consequence of circulating as well as cell surface bound drug bearing ICs, risk factors that are intrinsic either to the therapeutic molecule or to the host that might predispose to IC-mediated effects, and review the recent literature on prevalence and intensity of established examples of type II and III hypersensitivity reactions that follow the administration of a biotherapeutic. Additionally, we propose methods for the study of immune parameters specific to the biology of ICs that could be of use in conjunction with the detection of ADAs in circulation.