Search

Gene co-expression networks are a useful tool in the study of interactions that have allowed the visualization and quantification of diverse phenomena, including the loss of co-expression over long distances in cancerous samples. This characteristic, which could be considered fundamental to cancer, has been widely reported in various types of tumors. Since copy number variations (CNVs) have previously been identified as causing multiple genetic diseases, and gene expression is linked to them, they have often been mentioned as a probable cause of loss of co-expression in cancerous networks. In order to carry out a comparative study of the validity of this statement, we took 477 proteincoding genes from chromosome 8, and the CNVs of 101 genes, also proteincoding, belonging to the 8q24.3 region, a cytoband that is particularly active in the appearance of breast cancer. We created CNVS-conditioned co-expression networks of each of the 101 genes in the 8q24.3 region using conditional mutual information. The study was carried out using the four molecular subtypes of breast cancer (Luminal A, Luminal B, Her2, and Basal), as well as a case corresponding to healthy samples. We observed that in all cancer cases, the measurement of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic shows that there are no significant differences between one and other values of the CNVs for any case. Furthermore, the co-expression interactions are stronger in all cancer subtypes than in the control networks. However, the control network presents a homogeneously distributed set of co-expression interactions, while for cancer networks, the highest interactions are more confined to specific cytobands, in particular 8q24.3 and 8p21.3. With this approach, we demonstrate that despite copy number alterations in the 8q24 region being a common trait in breast cancer, the loss of long-distance co-expression in breast cancer is not determined by CNVs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gene co-expression networks are a useful tool in the study of interactions that have allowed the visualization and quantification of diverse phenomena, including the loss of co-expression over long distances in cancerous samples. This characteristic, which could be considered fundamental to cancer, has been widely reported in various types of tumors. Since copy number variations (CNVs) have previously been identified as causing multiple genetic diseases, and gene expression is linked to them, they have often been mentioned as a probable cause of loss of co-expression in cancerous networks. In order to carry out a comparative study of the validity of this statement, we took 477 protein-coding genes from chromosome 8, and the CNVs of 101 genes, also protein-coding, belonging to the 8q24.3 region, a cytoband that is particularly active in the appearance of breast cancer. We created CNVS-conditioned co-expression networks of each of the 101 genes in the 8q24.3 region using conditional mutual information. The study was carried out using the four molecular subtypes of breast cancer (Luminal A, Luminal B, Her2, and Basal), as well as a case corresponding to healthy samples. We observed that in all cancer cases, the measurement of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic shows that there are no significant differences between one and other values of the CNVs for any case. Furthermore, the co-expression interactions are stronger in all cancer subtypes than in the control networks. However, the control network presents a homogeneously distributed set of co-expression interactions, while for cancer networks, the highest interactions are more confined to specific cytobands, in particular 8q24.3 and 8p21.3. With this approach, we demonstrate that despite copy number alterations in the 8q24 region being a common trait in breast cancer, the loss of long-distance co-expression in breast cancer is not determined by CNVs.

GATA3 is known to be one of the most frequently mutated genes in breast cancer. More than 10% of breast tumors carry mutations in this gene. However, the functional consequence of GATA3 mutations is still largely unknown. Clinical data suggest that different types of GATA3 mutations may have distinct roles in breast cancer characterization. In this study, we have established three luminal breast cancer cell lines that stably express different truncation mutants (X308 splice site deletion, C321 frameshift, and A333 frameshift mutants) found in breast cancer patients. Transcriptome analysis identified common and distinct gene expression patterns in these GATA3 mutant cell lines. In particular, the impacts on epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) related genes are similar across these mutant cell lines. Chromatin localization of the mutants is highly overlapped and exhibits non-canonical motif enrichment. Interestingly, the A333 frameshift mutant expressed cells displayed the most significant impact on the GATA3 binding compared to X308 splice site deletion and C321fs mutants expressed cells. Our results suggest the common and different roles of GATA3 truncation mutations during luminal breast cancer development.

GATA3 is known to be one of the most frequently mutated genes in breast cancer. More than 10% of breast tumors carry mutations in this gene. However, the functional consequence of GATA3 mutations is still largely unknown. Clinical data suggest that different types of GATA3 mutations may have distinct roles in breast cancer characterization. In this study, we have established three luminal breast cancer cell lines that stably express different truncation mutants (X308 splice site deletion, C321 frameshift, and A333 frameshift mutants) found in breast cancer patients. Transcriptome analysis identified common and distinct gene expression patterns in these GATA3 mutant cell lines. In particular, the impacts on epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) related genes are similar across these mutant cell lines. Chromatin localization of the mutants is highly overlapped and exhibits non-canonical motif enrichment. Interestingly, the A333 frameshift mutant expressed cells displayed the most significant impact on the GATA3 binding compared to X308 splice site deletion and C321fs mutants expressed cells. Our results suggest the common and different roles of GATA3 truncation mutations during luminal breast cancer development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The tumor microenvironment (TME) has been reported to have significant value in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancers. This study aimed to identify key biomarkers in the TME of luminal breast cancer (BC).Methods: We obtained immune scores (ISs) and stromal scores (SSs) for The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) luminal BC cohort from the online ESTIMATE (Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues using Expression data) portal. The relationships between ISs and SSs and the overall survival of luminal BC patients were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The differentially expressed messenger RNAs (DEmRNAs) related to the ISs and SSs were subjected to functional enrichment analysis. Additionally, a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network was constructed with differentially expressed microRNAs (DEmiRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (DElncRNAs). Furthermore, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was established to analyze the DEmRNAs in the ceRNA network. Then, survival analysis of biomarkers involved in the ceRNA network was carried out to explore their prognostic value. Finally, these biomarkers were validated using the luminal BC dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database.Results: The results showed that ISs were significantly associated with longer survival times of luminal BC patients. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the DEmRNAs were mainly associated with immune response, antigen binding, and the extracellular region. In the PPI network, the top 10 DEmRNAs were identified as hub genes that affected the TME of luminal BC. Finally, two DEmiRNAs, two DElncRNAs, and 17 DEmRNAs of the ceRNA network associated with the TME were shown to have prognostic value. Subsequently, the expression of 15 prognostic biomarkers was validated in one additional dataset (GSE81002). In particular, one lncRNA (GVINP1) and five mRNAs (CCDC69, DOCK2, IKZF1, JCHAIN, and NCKAP1L) were novel biomarkers.Conclusions: Our studies demonstrated that ISs were associated with the survival of luminal BC patients, and a set of novel biomarkers that might play a prognostic role in the TME of luminal BC was identified.

Background: The tumor microenvironment (TME) has been reported to have significant value in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancers. This study aimed to identify key biomarkers in the TME of luminal breast cancer (BC). Methods: We obtained immune scores (ISs) and stromal scores (SSs) for The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) luminal BC cohort from the online ESTIMATE (Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues using Expression data) portal. The relationships between ISs and SSs and the overall survival of luminal BC patients were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The differentially expressed messenger RNAs (DEmRNAs) related to the ISs and SSs were subjected to functional enrichment analysis. Additionally, a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network was constructed with differentially expressed microRNAs (DEmiRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (DElncRNAs). Furthermore, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was established to analyze the DEmRNAs in the ceRNA network. Then, survival analysis of biomarkers involved in the ceRNA network was carried out to explore their prognostic value. Finally, these biomarkers were validated using the luminal BC dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Results: The results showed that ISs were significantly associated with longer survival times of luminal BC patients. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the DEmRNAs were mainly associated with immune response, antigen binding, and the extracellular region. In the PPI network, the top 10 DEmRNAs were identified as hub genes that affected the TME of luminal BC. Finally, two DEmiRNAs, two DElncRNAs, and 17 DEmRNAs of the ceRNA network associated with the TME were shown to have prognostic value. Subsequently, the expression of 15 prognostic biomarkers was validated in one additional dataset (GSE81002). In particular, one lncRNA (GVINP1) and five mRNAs (CCDC69, DOCK2, IKZF1, JCHAIN, and NCKAP1L) were novel biomarkers. Conclusions: Our studies demonstrated that ISs were associated with the survival of luminal BC patients, and a set of novel biomarkers that might play a prognostic role in the TME of luminal BC was identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]