Search

Various methods have been proposed for genomic prediction (GP) in livestock. These methods have mainly focused on statistical considerations and did not include genome annotation information. In this study, to improve the predictive performance of carcass traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle, we incorporated the genome annotation information into GP. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were annotated to five genomic classes: intergenic, gene, exon, protein coding sequences, and 3′/5′ untranslated region. Haploblocks were constructed for all markers and these five genomic classes by defining a biologically functional unit, and haplotype effects were modeled in both numerical dosage and categorical coding strategies. The first-order epistatic effects among SNPs and haplotypes were modeled using a categorical epistasis model. For all makers, the extension from the SNP-based model to a haplotype-based model improved the accuracy by 5.4–9.8% for carcass weight (CW), live weight (LW), and striploin (SI). For the five genomic classes using the haplotype-based prediction model, the incorporation of gene class information into the model improved the accuracies by an average of 1.4, 2.1, and 1.3% for CW, LW, and SI, respectively, compared with their corresponding results for all markers. Including the first-order epistatic effects into the prediction models improved the accuracies in some traits and genomic classes. Therefore, for traits with moderate-to-high heritability, incorporating genome annotation information of gene class into haplotype-based prediction models could be considered as a promising tool for GP in Chinese Simmental beef cattle, and modeling epistasis in prediction can further increase the accuracy to some degree. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Linear type traits describing the skeletal characteristics of an animal are moderately to strongly genetically correlated with a range of other performance traits in cattle including feed intake, reproduction traits and carcass merit; thus, type traits could also provide useful insights into the morphological differences among animals underpinning phenotypic differences in these complex traits. The objective of the present study was to identify genomic regions associated with five subjectively scored skeletal linear traits, to determine if these associated regions are common in multiple beef and dairy breeds, and also to determine if these regions overlap with those proposed elsewhere to be associated with correlated performance traits. Analyses were carried out using linear mixed models on imputed whole genome sequence data separately in 1,444 Angus, 1,129 Hereford, 6,433 Charolais, 8,745 Limousin, 1,698 Simmental, and 4,494 Holstein-Friesian cattle, all scored for the linear type traits. There was, on average, 18 months difference in age at assessment of the beef versus the dairy animals. While the majority of the identified quantitative trait loci (QTL), and thus genes, were both trait-specific and breed-specific, a large-effect pleiotropic QTL on BTA6 containing the NCAPG and LCORL genes was associated with all skeletal traits in the Limousin population and with wither height in the Angus. Other than that, little overlap existed in detected QTLs for the skeletal type traits in the other breeds. Only two QTLs overlapped the beef and dairy breeds; both QTLs were located on BTA5 and were associated with height in both the Angus and the Holstein-Friesian, despite the difference in age at assessment. Several detected QTLs in the present study overlapped with QTLs documented elsewhere that are associated with carcass traits, feed intake, and calving difficulty. While most breeding programs select for the macro-traits like carcass weight, carcass conformation, and feed intake, the higher degree of granularity with selection on the individual linear type traits in a multi-trait index underpinning the macro-level goal traits, presents an opportunity to help resolve genetic antagonisms among morphological traits in the pursuit of the animal with optimum performance metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The analysis of large genomic data is hampered by issues such as a small number of observations and a large number of predictive variables (commonly known as “large P small N”), high dimensionality or highly correlated data structures. Machine learning methods are renowned for dealing with these problems. To date machine learning methods have been applied in Genome-Wide Association Studies for identification of candidate genes, epistasis detection, gene network pathway analyses and genomic prediction of phenotypic values. However, the utility of two machine learning methods, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting Method (XgBoost), in identifying a subset of SNP makers for genomic prediction of breeding values has never been explored before. In this study, using 38,082 SNP markers and body weight phenotypes from 2,093 Brahman cattle (1,097 bulls as a discovery population and 996 cows as a validation population), we examined the efficiency of three machine learning methods, namely Random Forests (RF), GBM and XgBoost, in (a) the identification of top 400, 1,000, and 3,000 ranked SNPs; (b) using the subsets of SNPs to construct genomic relationship matrices (GRMs) for the estimation of genomic breeding values (GEBVs). For comparison purposes, we also calculated the GEBVs from (1) 400, 1,000, and 3,000 SNPs that were randomly selected and evenly spaced across the genome, and (2) from all the SNPs. We found that RF and especially GBM are efficient methods in identifying a subset of SNPs with direct links to candidate genes affecting the growth trait. In comparison to the estimate of prediction accuracy of GEBVs from using all SNPs (0.43), the 3,000 top SNPs identified by RF (0.42) and GBM (0.46) had similar values to those of the whole SNP panel. The performance of the subsets of SNPs from RF and GBM was substantially better than that of evenly spaced subsets across the genome (0.18–0.29). Of the three methods, RF and GBM consistently outperformed the XgBoost in genomic prediction accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]