Search

PurposeThere are few studies in Japan evaluating informational materials about passive smoking prevention with respect to health literacy. This study applied a range of health literacy assessment tools to assess the understandability of public-sector leaflets about passive smoking prevention.MethodsWe collected 26 anti-passive smoking leaflets published online by Japanese prefectural governments. We used three internationally recognized health literacy assessment tools to evaluate their understandability: the Clear Communication Index (CCI), the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT, further divided into scales for understandability and actionability).ResultsAlthough none of the assessed materials met the CCI's scoring threshold for “easy to understand,” the highest-scoring leaflet, which received a top-two ranking in three of the four scales (excluding the PEMAT understandability scale), was characterized by its conciseness and its easy-to-understand structure, including the use of checklists and flowcharts to engage reader interest. There was a significant correlation between CCI and SAM, and between SAM and the PEMAT understandability scale. However, the PEMAT actionability scale did not significantly associate with the other assessment scales.ConclusionsThe understandability of written informational materials about passive smoking prevention in Japan could be improved by referring to multiple assessment scales.

To investigate school-age children's perspectives on food and nutrition, we pilot tested a method to quantify and analyze crayon drawings collected from students in health education classes at two elementary schools in Fukushima, Japan. Included were 28 students in a mixed class of first and second graders and 26 students in a fourth-grade class. Specific foods, general shapes, and color choices in children's drawings were entered into a spreadsheet and analyzed quantitatively. From first- and second-graders' data, co-occurrence network analysis put meals into three groups: at home, eating out, and lunch boxes. Among fourth graders, co-occurrence network analysis called attention to the cucumber, noteworthy for being a local agricultural product. In addition, students who drew more side dishes also drew more staple foods and main dishes (p = 0.04), used more colors (p = 0.006), and showed satisfaction with their community (p = 0.04). These results suggest that students' understanding of eating was centered on the places where they eat and that they valued regional specialty products. Furthermore, the drawing of side dishes was indicative of a balanced diet, which in turn was associated with higher satisfaction with their community. Our trial indicates that children's drawings can be a useful tool for adults to grasp children's understanding of health-related information in daily living.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to fill the gap between Vietnamese diabetic patients' needs and care through a qualitative study asking about their experiences with diabetes and quality of care.MethodsInterviews with five diabetic patients were conducted at a tertiary general hospital located in southern Vietnam. The transcribed data were first subjected to quantitative text analysis using KH Coder to identify major categories of frequently used words, followed by a qualitative analysis of selected cases using the Steps for Coding and Theorization (SCAT) method.ResultsThe major categories of frequently used words were chronic health conditions, services, facilities, insurance, patient-doctor communication, and medication. SCAT analysis of three selected cases identified six themes: “Disregarding the disease at the early stage,” “Fear of complications,” “Satisfaction with hospital services and medical staff,” “Insurance-related problems,” “Long waiting times,” and “Communication barriers between patients and doctors.” Patients were satisfied with improved hospital facilities and services; however, the overloading of one hospital led to long waiting times and communication difficulties with doctors. Difficulties with health insurance were also observed, and patients were rather passive in disease management and needed to be empowered through improved communication with doctors and other care providers.ConclusionThese findings from our trial of introducing a qualitative study into service evaluation suggest that listening to patients can help health providers learn their perspectives and be more responsive to their needs.

Objective: Various types of handbooks that summarize and record health information (health handbooks) have been used in Japan for many years. The purpose of this study was to explore ways to evaluate the understandability and usability of commonly used printed health handbooks in Japan.Methods: An internet search was performed to identify health handbooks used in Japan. The handbooks were then collected, searched, and evaluated for the quality and functionality of the health-information. The overall understandability was assessed using the Suitability Assessment of Material (SAM) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CCI), and overall usability was assessed using a purpose-user matrix.Results: A total of 14 health handbooks were extracted and analyzed. The median scores for SAM and CCI were 39 (min 25, max 45) and 81.5% (60%, 100%), respectively, and no significant association was observed between the two evaluation scores. Based on the matrix, the most common type of handbook was those designed for preventive purposes that the user or their family completed (n = 9).Conclusion: Our sampled health handbooks were used mostly for preventive purposes and their understandability varied. SAM and CCI assess different aspects of written materials and it is recommended they be used together when evaluating the understandability of health handbooks. To facilitate more effective use of health handbooks in public health activities, we suggest the content of handbooks be assessed by a purpose-user matrix.

As the COVID-19 virus spread rapidly around the world, information related to the pandemic also spread quickly and in massive amounts. Uncertainty and unknowns about the pandemic together with the explosion of information created confusion and fear among many populations. A major challenge for public health practitioners is to provide clear and consistent messages that can be understood by different types of audiences, including vulnerable populations such as pregnant women and children who are often forgotten in this process. We compared and analyzed the development processes of health communication products for pregnant women in Madagascar and for elementary school children in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study compared these two field experiences in different socioeconomic settings to identify common strategies for the development of communication materials in a health crisis. The two cases both developed communication materials developed in collaboration with key local communicators and the target audiences. Both products used a simple and clear structure and included do's and don'ts. Messages were tailored toward the lifestyles of the target audience and phrased to fit with cultural and linguistic contexts. Both developer teams paid attention to easy-to-understand words and culturally accepted design and colors. The final products were distributed swiftly and widely through multiple channels with the local community. These two field experiences demonstrate common strategies for developing health communication materials that are culturally-tailored and visually-appealing in a timely manner and can be disseminated through existing channels in a health crisis. Our experiences emphasize that collaborative and iterative efforts based on an existing trust relationship with the target community can provide the foundation for a rapid communication response in a health crisis.