Search

IntroductionExercise training is an established intervention method for improving exercise capacity and survival rates in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, most reports have focused on European and American patients, with limited data regarding the effects of exercise training on cardiac function, hemodynamics, and exercise capacity in East Asian patients. This study investigated the effects of exercise training on cardiac function, hemodynamics, and exercise capacity in Japanese patients aged 65–80 years with HFpEF.MethodsThis single-center, open-label, non-randomized, controlled trial prospectively enrolled 99 outpatients. Eligibility criteria for HFpEF patients were an HFA score ≥5 in addition to clinical symptoms of heart failure and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Exercise training in the intervention group consisted of aerobic exercise and strength training thrice weekly for 5 months. Patients in the control group continued the usual treatment for 5 months. Resting cardiac function was evaluated using echocardiography. Peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2), ventilatory equivalent (VE) vs. carbon dioxide output (VCO2) slope, peak cardiac output index, and arteriovenous oxygen difference were calculated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing combined with impedance cardiography.ResultsAfter 5 months of exercise training, remarkable interactions were observed, with peakVO2 as the primary outcome. Additionally, significant interactions were observed between hemodynamic indices and some echocardiographic parameters. The mean percentage change in peakVO2 from baseline was 8.3% in the intervention group. Fifteen study participants (30.1%) in the intervention group achieved a clinically meaningful change of 3.0 ml/min/kg (10% improvement) in peakVO2 from baseline. The group with 3.0 ml/min/kg or 10% improvement in peakVO2 from baseline had a considerably lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus and VE vs. VCO2 slope and considerably higher left atrial-global longitudinal strain values than the group without any notable improvements.ConclusionsAlthough exercise training can help improve exercise intolerance in Japanese patients aged 65–80 years with HFpEF, its benefits are limited. Our results suggest that HFpEF, complicated by diabetes mellitus and decreased ventilatory efficiency during exercise, may require reconsideration of intervention strategies. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network, a trial registry in Japan (registration number: UMIN000045474).

PurposeThe study aims to evaluate the effects of high-intensity and moderate-intensity exercise training on cardiopulmonary function and exercise endurance in patients with coronary artery diseases (CAD).MethodsWe performed a systematic search of the English and Chinese databases from their inception to March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to compare high-intensity and moderate-intensity exercise training on cardiopulmonary function in patients with CAD. The primary outcomes included peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) and anaerobic threshold (AT). The secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), exercises duration (ED), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), resting heart rate (RHR), peak heart rate (PHR) and oxygen pulse (O2 pulse). The continuous variables were expressed as mean differences (MD) along with their corresponding standard deviations (SD), and the I2 test was applied in the assessment of heterogeneity.ResultsAfter systematically literature search, 19 studies were finally selected for our meta-analysis (n = 1,036), with 511 patients in the experimental group (high-intensity exercise) and 525 patients in the control group (moderate-intensity exercise). The results showed that high-intensity exercise significantly increased patients' Peak VO2 [MD = 2.67, 95% CI (2.24, 3.09), P < 0.00001], LVEF [MD = 3.60, 95% CI (2.17, 5.03), P < 0.00001], ED [MD = 37.51, 95% CI (34.02, 41.00), P < 0.00001], PHR [MD = 6.86, 95% CI (4.49, 9.24), P < 0.00001], and O2 pulse [MD = 0.97, 95% CI (0.34, 1.60), P = 0.003] compared with moderate-intensity exercise. However, there were no significant differences in AT [MD = 0.49, 95% CI (−0.12, 1.10), P = 0.11], RER [MD = 0.00, 95% CI (−0.01, 0.02), P = 0.56], and RHR [MD = 1.10, 95% CI (−0.43, 2.63), P = 0.16].ConclusionOur results show that high-intensity exercise training has more significant positive effects compared with moderate-intensity exercise training in improving peak VO2, LVEF, ED, PHR and O2 pulse in patients with CAD, while no significant differences were observed in AT, RER and RHR. To sum up, high-intensity exercise training is better than moderate-intensity exercise training in improving cardiopulmonary function and exercise endurance in patients with CAD.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO (CRD42022328475), https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.

BackgroundIn Fontans, exercise tolerance is poorer compared to their healthy peers. Higher V˙O2peak represents a strong predictor for mortality and morbidity in these patients. Cardiac rehabilitation programs have been shown to improve cardiopulmonary function in Fontans. More habitual physical activity should therefore lead to a better exercise tolerance.MethodsWe performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 24 Fontan patients who had engaged in physical activity for a minimum of 3 h per week over their lifetime. As a control we performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 20 Fontan patients who had undertaken no physical activity or

IntroductionHigh-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an emerging method of cardiac rehabilitation, which is more and more popular in recent years. Research into the effect of HIIT on peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) and myocardial fibrosis among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is lacking. Here, we describe the rationale along with the protocol for a clinical trial to test the following hypotheses: (1) compared with the control group, VO2 peak will be increased in both the moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and HIIT groups and (2) compared with the control group, myocardial fibrosis due to MI will be improved by HIIT and MICT.Methods and AnalysisThis is a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. In total, 180 patients with MI are to be recruited for this study. VO2 peak will be tested by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and myocardial fibrosis will be evaluated by cardiac MR. A variety of blood and psychometric tests and also the peripheral arterial tonometry, reactive hyperemia index for microvascular endothelial function, and microvascular blockage or digital vasomotor response are included.Ethics and DisseminationThe ethics committee of the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital has authorized this mechanistic clinical research. Peer-reviewed articles and conference presentations will be used to disseminate the findings.Trial Registration NumberNCT04863677.

BackgroundStudies have shown that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for increasing peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. To our knowledge, previously published systematic reviews have neither compared different HIIT models with MICT nor investigated intervention frequencies of HIIT vs. MICT for purposes of improving cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD.ObjectiveThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of different training models, intervention frequencies and weeks of HIIT vs. MICT on changes in cardiorespiratory fitness during cardiac rehabilitation (CR).MethodsA systematic search was carried out for research articles on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus databases for the period up to December 2021. We searched for RCTs that compared the effect of HIIT vs. MICT on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD.ResultsTwenty-two studies with 949 participants (HIIT: 476, MICT: 473) met the inclusion criteria. Sensitivity analysis revealed that HIIT increased VO2peak more than MICT (MD = 1.35). In the training models and durations, there was a greater increase in VO2peak with medium-interval HIIT (MD = 4.02) and more than 12 weeks duration (MD = 2.35) than with MICT. There were significant improvements in VO2peak with a HIIT frequency of 3 times/week (MD = 1.28). Overall, one minor cardiovascular and four non-cardiovascular adverse events were reported in the HIIT group, while six non-cardiovascular adverse events were reported in the MICT group.ConclusionHIIT is safe and appears to be more effective than MICT for improving cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD. Medium-interval HIIT 3 times/week for more than 12 weeks resulted in the largest improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness during CR.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245810, identifier: CRD42021245810.

Background: As demand for cardiopulmonary exercise test using a supine position has increased, so have the testing options. However, it remains uncertain whether the existing evaluation criteria for the upright position are suitable for the supine position. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the differences in peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) between upright and supine lower extremity bicycle exercise.Methods: We searched PubMed, Web Of Science and Embase from inception to March 27, 2021. Self-control studies comparing VO2peak between upright and supine were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using a checklist adapted from published papers in this field. The effect of posture on VO2peak was pooled using random/fixed effects model.Results: This meta-analysis included 32 self-control studies, involving 546 participants (63% were male). 21 studies included only healthy people, 9 studies included patients with cardiopulmonary disease, and 2 studies included both the healthy and cardiopulmonary patients. In terms of study quality, most of the studies (n = 21, 66%) describe the exercise protocol, and we judged theVO2peak to be valid in 26 (81%) studies. Meta-analysis showed that the upright VO2peak exceeded the supine VO2peak [relative VO2peak: mean difference (MD) 2.63 ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66-3.59, I2 = 56%, p < 0.05; absolute VO2peak: MD 0.18 L/min, 95% CI 0.10-0.26, I2 = 63%, p < 0.05). Moreover, subgroup analysis showed there was more pooled difference in healthy people (4.04 ml/kg/min or 0.22 L/min) than in cardiopulmonary patients (1.03 ml/kg/min or 0.12 L/min).Conclusion: VO2peak in the upright position is higher than that in supine position. However, whether this difference has clinical significance needs further verification.Systematic Review Registration: identifier, CRD42021233468.

Introduction: Exercise training is an established intervention method for improving exercise capacity and survival rates in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, most reports have focused on European and American patients, with limited data regarding the effects of exercise training on cardiac function, hemodynamics, and exercise capacity in East Asian patients. This study investigated the effects of exercise training on cardiac function, hemodynamics, and exercise capacity in Japanese patients aged 65-80 years with HFpEF., Methods: This single-center, open-label, non-randomized, controlled trial prospectively enrolled 99 outpatients. Eligibility criteria for HFpEF patients were an HFA score ≥5 in addition to clinical symptoms of heart failure and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Exercise training in the intervention group consisted of aerobic exercise and strength training thrice weekly for 5 months. Patients in the control group continued the usual treatment for 5 months. Resting cardiac function was evaluated using echocardiography. Peak oxygen uptake (peakVO 2 ), ventilatory equivalent (VE) vs. carbon dioxide output (VCO 2 ) slope, peak cardiac output index, and arteriovenous oxygen difference were calculated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing combined with impedance cardiography., Results: After 5 months of exercise training, remarkable interactions were observed, with peakVO 2 as the primary outcome. Additionally, significant interactions were observed between hemodynamic indices and some echocardiographic parameters. The mean percentage change in peakVO 2 from baseline was 8.3% in the intervention group. Fifteen study participants (30.1%) in the intervention group achieved a clinically meaningful change of 3.0 ml/min/kg (10% improvement) in peakVO 2 from baseline. The group with 3.0 ml/min/kg or 10% improvement in peakVO 2 from baseline had a considerably lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus and VE vs. VCO 2 slope and considerably higher left atrial-global longitudinal strain values than the group without any notable improvements., Conclusions: Although exercise training can help improve exercise intolerance in Japanese patients aged 65-80 years with HFpEF, its benefits are limited. Our results suggest that HFpEF, complicated by diabetes mellitus and decreased ventilatory efficiency during exercise, may require reconsideration of intervention strategies. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network, a trial registry in Japan (registration number: UMIN000045474)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Sugita, Ito, Yoshioka, Kudo, Arakawa and Sakai.)

Background: In Fontans, exercise tolerance is poorer compared to their healthy peers. Higher V ˙ O 2 p e a k represents a strong predictor for mortality and morbidity in these patients. Cardiac rehabilitation programs have been shown to improve cardiopulmonary function in Fontans. More habitual physical activity should therefore lead to a better exercise tolerance., Methods: We performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 24 Fontan patients who had engaged in physical activity for a minimum of 3 h per week over their lifetime. As a control we performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 20 Fontan patients who had undertaken no physical activity or <3 h per week in the past., Results: A total of 44 Fontan patients was included (mean age 18.1 years). The mean parameters measured at peak exercise differed significantly between the active and inactive group (peak oxygen uptake [ V ˙ O 2 p e a k ] of 34.0 vs. 25.0 ml/min/kg, peak heart rate (HR) of 169.8/min vs. 139.8/min). Even though the O 2 pulse and the EF did not differ significantly between both groups, N-Terminal-Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-pro BNP) was significantly higher in the inactive group. The two groups did not differ with respect to their cardiac function determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). V ˙ O 2 p e a k was positively correlated with hours of sports performed by Fontans., Conclusions: V ˙ O 2 p e a k and maximum HR were significantly higher in Fontans who had been physically active compared to those who had been inactive. The values reported in this study were higher than in other studies and reached normal values for V ˙ O 2 p e a k for most Fontans in the physically active group. The positive correlation between V ˙ O 2 p e a k and physical activity is an indicator of the importance of incorporating physical exercise programs into the treatment of Fontan patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Weigelt, Fritsch, Rottermann, Wällisch, Moosmann, Dittrich, Purbojo and Schöffl.)

Introduction: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an emerging method of cardiac rehabilitation, which is more and more popular in recent years. Research into the effect of HIIT on peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak) and myocardial fibrosis among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is lacking. Here, we describe the rationale along with the protocol for a clinical trial to test the following hypotheses: (1) compared with the control group, VO 2 peak will be increased in both the moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and HIIT groups and (2) compared with the control group, myocardial fibrosis due to MI will be improved by HIIT and MICT., Methods and Analysis: This is a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. In total, 180 patients with MI are to be recruited for this study. VO 2 peak will be tested by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and myocardial fibrosis will be evaluated by cardiac MR. A variety of blood and psychometric tests and also the peripheral arterial tonometry, reactive hyperemia index for microvascular endothelial function, and microvascular blockage or digital vasomotor response are included., Ethics and Dissemination: The ethics committee of the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital has authorized this mechanistic clinical research. Peer-reviewed articles and conference presentations will be used to disseminate the findings., Trial Registration Number: NCT04863677., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Shi, Chen, Qiu, Luo, Luo, Liu, Geng, Ma, Xue and Guo.)