Search

Cigarette smoke is known to generate free radicals by various mechanisms. In this study involving 30 non-smokers and 30 smokers, we show that urinary excretion of 5-(hydroxymethyl) uracil (HMUra) was not different in the two groups (6.54+/-2.07 vs. 6.70+/-1.68 nmol/mmol creatinine). In contrast, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dGuo) excretion increased by 16% (1.16+/-0.35 vs. 1.35+/-0.50 nmol/mmol creatinine, p = 0.039). Results concerning 8-oxo-dGuo are in agreement with those of previous studies. We observed significant multiple correlations between HMUra and creatinine (r(p) = 0.44), BMI (r(p) = -0.27) and nicotine derivatives (r(p) = 0.26). Multiple correlation analysis showed relations between 8-oxo-dGuo on the one hand, and: creatinine (r(p) = 0.36), nicotine derivatives (r(p) = 0.29), BMI (r(p) = -0.24) on the other.

We measured the base 5-(hydroxymethyl) uracil (HMUra) and the nucleoside 8-oxo-7,8-dehydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dGuo) in urine of adriamycin-treated cancer patients. Adriamycin has been shown to generate oxygen free radicals by various mechanisms. HMUra and 8-oxo-dGuo are two known lesions of DNA, produced by oxygen free reaction on thymine and 2'-deoxyguanosine, respectively. HMUra was measured by GC-MS/isotopic dilution and 8-oxo-dGuo by HPLC/EC, both after prepurification by semipreparative HPLC. Here we report the results of a study involving 20 cancer patients treated with flash doses of ADR. We found that urine HMUra is significantly increased (HMUra (nmol/24h): 80.8 8.44 vs. 98.7+/-6.87; p < 0.01) 24h after administration of the drug, while 8-oxo-dGuo did not show any significant variation. Urine HMUra seems to be a suitable short-term marker of DNA alterations by oxygen free radicals.

GC-MS is a widely used tool to measure oxidative DNA damage because of its ability to identify a wide range of base modification products. However, it has been suggested that the derivatization procedures required to form volatile products prior to GC-MS analysis can sometimes produce artifactual formation of certain base oxidation products, although these studies did not replicate previously-used reaction conditions, e.g. they failed to remove air from the derivatization vials. A systematic examination of this problem revealed that levels of 8-hydroxyguanine, 8-hydroxyadenine, 5-hydroxycytosine and 5-(hydroxymethyluracil) in commercial calf thymus DNA determined by GC-MS are elevated by increasing the temperature at which derivatization is performed in our laboratory. In particular, 8-hydroxyguanine levels after silylation at 140 degrees C were raised 8-fold compared to derivatization at 23 degrees C. Experiments on the derivatization of each undamaged base revealed that the artifactual oxidation of guanine, adenine, cytosine and thymine respectively was responsible. Formation of the above products was potentiated by not purging with nitrogen prior to derivatization. Increasing the temperature to 140 degrees C or allowing air to be present during derivatization did not significantly increase levels of the other oxidized bases measured. This work suggests that artifactual oxidation during derivatization is restricted to certain products (8-hydroxyguanine, 8-hydroxyadenine, 5-hydroxycytosine and 5-[hydroxymethyluracil]) and can be decreased by reducing the temperature of the derivatization reaction to 23 degrees C and excluding as much air possible. Despite some recent reports, we were easily able to detect formamidopyrimidines in acid-hydrolyzed DNA. Artifacts of derivatization are less marked than has been claimed in some papers and may vary between laboratories, depending on the experimental procedures used, in particular the efficiency of exclusion of O2 during the derivatization process.

In order to eliminate the possibility that diet may influence urinary oxidative DNA lesion levels, in our experiments we used a recently developed technique involving HPLC pre-purification followed by gas chromatography with isotope dilution mass spectrometric detection. This methodology was applied for the determination of the lesions: 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoGua), 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodGuo) and 5-(hydroxymethyl)uracil (5HMUra) in the urine of mice fed with nucleic acid free diet and normal, unrestricted diet. The mean levels of 8-oxoGua, 8-oxodGuo and 5HMUra of the animals fed the normal diet reached the mean values of 15.6 +/- 3.5, 2.0 +/- 0.53 and 16.8 +/- 10.4 nmol/kg/24 h, After feeding the mice for 12 days with nucleic acid free diet the respective values were 18.8 +/- 4.6, 1.6 +/- 0.3 and 25.4 +/- 10.5 nmol/kg/24 h, respectively. The results clearly demonstrate that irrespective of the diet, the excretion rates were not statistically different during the course of feeding. The respective p values for the differences between lesions in the two types of diets were: 0.13 (8-oxoGua), 0.16 (8-oxodGuo), 0.18 (5-HMUra). Our results clearly indicate that diet does not contribute to urinary excretion of the lesions in mouse model.

Recently, several papers reported an artifactual formation of a number of modified bases from intact DNA bases during derivatization of DNA hydrolysates to be analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). These reports dealt with 8-hydroxyguanine (8-OH-Gua), 5-hydroxycytosine (5-OH-Cyt), 8-hydroxyadenine (8-OH-Ade), 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5-OHMeUra) and 5-formyluracil that represent only a small percentage of the 20 or so modified DNA bases that can be analyzed by GC/MS. Removal of intact DNA bases by prepurification of calf thymus DNA hydrolysates using HPLC was shown to prevent artifactual formation of these modified bases during derivatization. It needs to be emphasized that the procedures for hydrolysis of DNA and derivatization of DNA hydrolysates used in these papers substantially differed from the established procedures previously described. Furthermore, a large number of relevant papers reporting the levels of these modified bases in DNA of various sources have been ignored. Interestingly, the levels of modified bases reported in the literature were not as high as those reported prior to prepurification. Most values for the level of 5-OH-Cyt were even lower than the level measured after prepurification. Levels of 8-OH-Ade were quite close to, or even the same as, or smaller than the level reported after prepurification. The same holds true for 5-OHMeUra and 8-OH-Gua. All these facts raise the question of the validity of the claims about the measurement of these modified DNA bases by GC/MS. A recent paper reported a complete destruction of 2, 6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine (Fapy-Gua) and 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine (FapyAde) by formic acid under the conditions of DNA hydrolysis prior to GC/MS. The complete destruction of FapyGua and FapyAde by formic acid is in disagreement with the data on these compounds in the literature. These two compounds were measured by GC/MS following formic acid hydrolysis for many years in our laboratory and by other researchers with no difficulties. These facts clearly raise the question of the validity of the claims made about the previous measurements of these compounds by GC/MS.