Search

Background: Thorough understanding of the morphometry of the ankle joint is crucial to optimize conservative and operative therapy of ankle joint disorders. Despite recent improvements, basic anatomic and biomechanical correlations of the ankle joint including the orientation of the ankle joint axis and joint morphology as its key biomechanical features are not sufficiently recorded to date. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the ankle morphometry to gain information about the ankle joint axis.Material and Methods: In this study 98 high-resolution CT-scans of complete Caucasian cadaver legs were analysed. Using the software Mimics and 3-Matic (Materialize) 22 anatomic parameters of the talocrural joint were assessed, including the length, width and surface area of the tibial and talar articular areas. Additionally, the radii of the articular areas, the medial distal tibial angle and the height of the talar dome were determined.Results: The radius of the central trochlea tali was 44.6±4.1mm (mean±SD). The central trochlea tali arc length was 40.8±3.0mm and its width was 27.4±2.5mm. Additionally we determined 47.0±4.4mm for the tibial sagittal radius, 27.6±3.0mm for the tibial arc length and 27.4±2.5mm for the central tibial width.Conclusion: The present study describes the three-dimensional morphometry of Caucasian ankle joints in detail. This dimensional analysis of the ankle joint will inform the development and placements of implants and prostheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite intensive research there is no consensus about the talocrural joint axis. The aim of the present study is a new method to determinate the geometric rotational axis of the talocrural joint.Methods: We analyzed 98 CT-scans of full cadaver Caucasian legs. We generated three-dimensional reconstruction models of the talus. A best fitting cone was orientated to the talar articular surface. The geometric rotational axis was defined to be the axis of this cone.Results: The geometric rotational axis of the talocrural joint is orientated from lateral-distal to medial-proximal (85.6°±10 compared to anatomical tibial axis in torsional plane), from posterior-distal to anterior-proximal (81.43°±44.35 compared to anatomical tibial axis in sagittal plane) and from posterior-medial to anterior-lateral (169.2°±5.91 compared to intermalleolar axis in axial plane).Conclusions: The consideration of our results might be helpful for better understanding of ankle biomechanics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]