1. Biomechanical Evaluation of Tarsometatarsal Fusion Comparing Crossing Lag Screws and Lag Screw With Locking Plate
- Author
-
Sarah Ettinger, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Christian Plaass, Daiwei Yao, Leif Claassen, Michael Schwarze, and Lisa-Christin Hemmersbach
- Subjects
Orthodontics ,musculoskeletal diseases ,tarsometatarsal arthritis ,business.industry ,Arthrodesis ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Bone Screws ,Articles ,Locking plate ,Biomechanical Phenomena ,Fixation (surgical) ,Fracture Fixation, Internal ,Lag screw ,Lisfranc ,medicine ,tarsometatarsal arthrodesis fusion ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Surgery ,Tarsometatarsal fusion ,business ,human activities ,Bone Plates ,Metatarsal Bones ,locking plate - Abstract
Background: Tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis is a common operative procedure for end-stage arthritis of the TMT joints. To date, there is no consensus on the best fixation technique for TMT arthrodesis and which joints should be included. Methods: Thirty fresh-frozen feet were divided into one group (15 feet) in which TMT joints I-III were fused with a lag screw and locking plate and a second group (15 feet) in which TMT joints I-III were fused with 2 crossing lag screws. The arthrodesis was performed stepwise with evaluation of mobility between the metatarsal and cuneiform bones after every application or removal of a lag screw or locking plate. Results: Isolated lag-screw arthrodesis of the TMT I-III joints led to significantly increased stability in every joint ( P < .05). Additional application of a locking plate caused further stability in every TMT joint ( P < .05). An additional crossed lag screw did not significantly increase rigidity of the TMT II and III joints ( P > .05). An IM screw did not influence the stability of the fused TMT joints. For TMT III arthrodesis, lag-screw and locking plate constructs were superior to crossed lag-screw fixation ( P < .05). TMT I fusion does not support stability after TMT II and III arthrodesis. Conclusion: Each fixation technique provided sufficient stabilization of the TMT joints. Use of a lag screw plus locking plate might be superior to crossed screw fixation. An additional TMT I and/or III arthrodesis did not increase stability of an isolated TMT II arthrodesis. Clinical Relevance: We report the first biomechanical evaluation of TMT I-III arthrodesis. Our results may help surgeons to choose among osteosynthesis techniques and which joints to include in performing arthrodesis of TMT I-III joints.
- Published
- 2021