Search

This study investigated whether the illegal application of ethinylestradiol or clenbuterol in cattle as growth promotors may be concealed by co-treatment with drugs that affect urinary excretion. Therefore, six male veal calves were fed with ethinylestradiol and six different male veal calves were fed with clenbuterol for 13 days. Both groups received the growth promotors twice daily (days -2 to 11) with milk replacer. The calves receiving ethinylestradiol were additionally fed with probenecid on days 7-11, and the calves receiving clenbuterol were additionally fed with trimethoprim (days 7-11). During days 1-11 of the experiment, 24-h urine and blood samples (once daily) were collected and analyses for ethinylestradiol and clenbuterol by specific enzyme immunoassay. In four calves the average urinary excretion of ethinylestradiol during days 7-11 (co-treatment with probenecid) was only about 25% of their average urinary excretion of ethinylestradiol on days 1-6. In the other two calves of this group, the excretion of ethinylestradiol was reduced to 4% on days 7-11 compared with days 1-6. In these two calves several urine samples provided concentrations of ethinylestradiol around the limit of detection. As a consequence, there may be a chance of concealing ethinylestradiol application by co-treatment with probenecid. Co-treatment with trimethoprim led only to a slight reduction of urinary excretion of clenbuterol. The detection of clenbuterol in urine samples from calves which were co-treated with trimethoprim can thus not be prevented.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the illegal application of clenbuterol, ethinylestradiol and methyltestosterone in cattle as growth promoters can be concealed by co-treatment with drugs that affect urinary excretion. Six male veal calves were fed with 0.8 micrograms clenbuterol kg-1 of body weight (BW), 3.5 micrograms ethinylestradiol kg-1 BW and 35 micrograms methyltestosterone kg-1 BW together twice daily for 28 days. At the eighth day of clenbuterol, ethinylestradiol and methyltestosterone treatment each calf was additionally fed either with probenecid, para-aminohippuric acid, trimethoprim, famotidine or cimetidine at three different doses which were increased in weekly intervals. During the treatment 24 h-urine and blood samples (once daily) were obtained and analysed for clenbuterol, ethinylestradiol and methyltestosterone by specific enzyme immunoassay. By high performance liquid chromatography/enzyme immunoassay it was determined whether these drugs or their metabolites interfered with the immunological detection of the growth promoters. Clenbuterol, ethinylestradiol and methyltestosterone could be detected in plasma and urine throughout the whole experiment. Co-treatment with probenecid led to a five-fold reduction in urinary excretion of ethinylestradiol and co-treatment with trimethoprim led to a three-fold reduction in urinary excretion of clenbuterol. None of the drugs reduced urinary excretion of the growth promoters to concentrations below the limit of detection. The detection of these three growth promoters in urine samples from calves which were co-treated with the drugs tested in this study can thus not be prevented.