Search

Canola (Brassica napus L.) often experiences high seed losses prior to and during harvest operations. Pod drop and pod shatter are responsible for pre-harvest seed losses in canola although relatively little is known about the significance of pod drop to total pre-harvest seed losses in canola. This research describes a method to measure the predisposition for pod drop among canola genotypes that was developed and tested across different sites from 2013 to 2015. This method, referred to as pod-retention resistance, consists of the use of a force gauge to quantify the force required to break the pod pedicle at the pedicle-rachis junction. Two sets of field experiments were used, the first developed and modeled the factors that influence pod-retention resistance, pod drop and seed shatter. A second set of experiments was used to validate these findings on a broader range of genotypes and determine whether a relationship between pod retention resistance and pod drop could be determined. Results showed that the pod-retention resistance was significantly greater for pods on the proximal half of the rachis compared to the distal half of the rachis. Several factors contributed strongly to variation in pod retention resistance (rachis position, genotype and site) and pod drop (site, rachis position and genotype). The relative importance of individual factors varied between pod retention resistance and pod drop suggesting no relationship between the two. However, weight-adjusted pod retention resistance, i.e., average pod retention resistance corrected for the average weight of dropped pods, was strongly correlated with pod drop, particularly in the validation experiments. This method could be used by canola breeders to select for and develop genotypes with reduced predisposition for seed losses via pod drop.

Alternative cropping systems are gaining attention throughout the world in order to increase the sustainability of agro-ecosystems. On the Canadian prairies, the tillage-based crop-fallow system has been replaced by no-till reduced input systems or tillage-based organic systems with more diversity in crop rotations but with no external inputs. However, the long-term effects of these alternative systems on weed and yield parameters have not been assessed. A study to examine weed and crop yield dynamics under diverse cropping systems was conducted within a 18-year cropping systems study near Scott, Saskatchewan. The trial was laid out in a split-split-plot design with four replicates. The main plots were three levels of inputs; a high input system (HIGH) that used tillage and inputs to maximize yield, a reduced system (RED) that used no-till practices and minimal inputs, and a tillage-based organic system (ORG) with no external inputs. The subplots were cropping diversity (rotations); fallow-annual grains (LOW), diversified annual grains (DAG), and diversified annuals and perennial forage (DAP). The sub-sub plots were the six phases of each rotation. There was an input by rotation interaction for weed biomass but not for weed density and crop yields. ORG systems had 7× and 4× greater weed density (107 plants m −2 ), 4× higher weed biomass (154 kg ha −1 ), and 32% and 35% lower yields (1052 kg ha −1 ) than RED and HIGH systems respectively. RED and HIGH input systems had similar crop yields and lower weed density than ORG. The LOW rotation had the lowest weed density. LOW and DAG rotations had similar yields, which were higher than in DAP. All systems showed an increase in weed density and biomass over time but did not impact on crop yields which was increasing over time likely influenced by a concurrent increase in rainfall. This study concludes that eliminating tillage and reducing agrochemicals is possible but eliminating agrochemicals requires better crop rotations for weed management as well as for nutrient management.

Weed management in organic lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) is challenging due to its poorly competitive nature with weeds and the lack of organic herbicides for field crops. In-crop mechanical weed control methods such as rotary hoeing, harrowing and inter-row cultivation, and the cultural practice of increased crop seeding rate, are established weed management tools in organic field crops. They have however not previously been combined into an integrated weed management system for weakly competitive grain crops. The objective of this research was to determine the effect of mechanical weed control (rotary hoeing, harrowing and inter-row cultivation) and crop seeding rate alone and in combination on weed suppression and yield in organic lentil. A two-factor randomized complete block design experiment was conducted at two locations in Saskatchewan, Canada in 2016 and 2017. The factors mechanical weed control methods including the rotary hoe, the harrow and inter-row cultivation and an untreated control, and seeding rates including conventional recommended and double recommended seeding rate. All treatments were tested as stand-alone or combined in a factorial fashion. Increased crop seeding rate and mechanical weed control affected response variables independently of each other. Doubling the seeding rate of lentil reduced weed biomass by 16% and increased lentil yield by 23% averaged across the four site-years. Treatments that included only a single mechanical weed control methods resulted in poor or incomplete weed suppression at all sites. Two mechanical weed control methods were required to maximize yield, and three were required to minimize weed biomass. Early weed control with a rotary hoe, followed by inter-row cultivation prior to canopy closure was the most consistent mechanical weed control treatment across the four site-years. Averaged across the four site-years, rotary hoeing + inter-row cultivation reduced weed biomass by 70%, and increased crop yield by 65%. The treatment maintained low weed populations across the longest time duration and controlled weeds in both the inter- and intra-row spaces, while minimizing crop injury. Doubling crop seeding rate and using two appropriately timed mechanical weed control methods provided weed suppression while increasing yield by 46% in a weakly competitive organic lentil crop.