1. In vitro fertilization and perinatal outcomes of patients with advanced maternal age after single frozen euploid embryo transfer: a propensity score-matched analysis of autologous and donor cycles.
- Author
-
Cozzolino M, Capalbo A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Pellicer A, Vaiarelli A, Galliano D, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi FM, Parini V, and Levi-Setti PE
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Adult, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Propensity Score, Cryopreservation, Treatment Outcome, Live Birth, Oocyte Donation, Pregnancy Rate, Infertility therapy, Infertility diagnosis, Infertility physiopathology, Pregnancy Outcome epidemiology, Maternal Age, Fertilization in Vitro adverse effects, Fertilization in Vitro methods, Single Embryo Transfer adverse effects
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate in vitro fertilization (IVF) and perinatal outcomes of donor egg and autologous cycles in patients with advanced reproductive age after undergoing single frozen euploid embryo transfer., Design: A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study., Setting: University-affiliated and private IVF centers., Patient(s): Patients aged 39-46 years who underwent IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using whole-chromosome sequencing with donor (n = 278) or autologous (n = 278) oocytes between October 2017 and October 2021., Intervention(s): Single frozen euploid embryo transfer with donor or autologous euploid embryo., Main Outcome Measure(s): The main outcome measure was the live birth rate (LBR) after the first embryo transfer, calculated per embryo transfer. The secondary outcomes included the implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and gestational age and birth weight at the time of delivery., Result(s): Patients using donor or autologous oocytes had a similar likelihood of implantation (57.91% [51.87-63.78] vs. 57.19% [51.15-63.09]) and LBR (41.01% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 35.17-47.04] vs. 42.45% [95% CI, 36.56-48.49]). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the ectopic pregnancy rate (0.72% [0.09-2.57] vs. 0.36% [0.01-1.99]), miscarriage rate (16.19% [12.06-21.05] vs. 14.39% [95% CI, 10.48-19.08]), gestational age (38.50 [38.08-38.92] vs. 39.16 [38.25-40.07] weeks), or birth weight of infants (2,982.25 [2,606.69-3,357.81] vs. 3,128.24 [2,962.30-3,294.17] kg). The univariate analysis showed no association between advanced maternal age and the LBR (relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.84-1.25]). Multivariate analysis using putative confounders for embryo competency found no associations with LBR (adjusted relative risk, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.75-1.98])., Conclusion(s): Patients with euploid blastocysts derived from donor or autologous oocytes did not reveal statistically significant differences in the LBR, implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, duration of gestation, or infant birth weight. These findings suggest that age-related reproductive decline and/or poor IVF outcomes associated with women with advanced reproductive age undergoing IVF are heavily driven by embryonic aneuploidy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests M.C. has nothing to disclose. A.C. has nothing to disclose. J.A.G.-V. has nothing to disclose. A.P. has nothing to disclose. A.V. has nothing to disclose. D.G. has nothing to disclose. D.C. has nothing to disclose. F.M.U. has nothing to disclose. V.P. has nothing to disclose. P.E.L.-S. has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF