Search

Objective: To evaluate whether metaphase I (MI) oocytes completing maturation in vitro to metaphase II ("MI-MII oocytes") have similar developmental competence as the sibling metaphase II (MII) oocytes that reached maturity in vivo., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Academic medical center., Patient(s): A total of 1,124 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles from 800 patients at a single academic center between April 2016 and December 2020 with at least 1 MII oocyte immediately after retrieval and at least 1 sibling "MI-MII oocyte" that was retrieved as MI and matured to MII in culture before ICSI were included in the study., Intervention(s): None., Main Outcome Measure(s): A total of 7,865 MII and 2,369 sibling MI-MII oocytes retrieved from the same individuals were compared for the fertilization and blastocyst formation rates. For patients who underwent single euploid blastocyst transfers (n = 406), the clinical pregnancy, spontaneous pregnancy loss, and live birth rates were compared between the 2 groups., Result(s): The fertilization rate was significantly higher in MII oocytes than in delayed matured MI-MII oocytes (75.9% vs. 56.1%). Similarly, the blastocyst formation rate was higher in embryos derived from MII oocytes than in those from MI-MII oocytes (53.8% vs. 23.9%). The percentage of euploid embryos derived from MII oocytes was significantly higher than that of those from MI-MII oocytes (49.2% vs. 34.7%). Paired comparison of sibling oocytes within the same cycle showed higher developmental competence of the MII oocytes than that of MI-MII oocytes. However, the pregnancy, spontaneous pregnancy loss, and live birth rates after a single euploid blastocyst transfer showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (MII vs. MI-MII group, 65.7% vs. 74.1%, 6.4% vs. 5.0%, and 61.5% vs. 70.0%, respectively)., Conclusion(s): Compared with oocytes that matured in vivo and were retrieved as MII, the oocytes that were retrieved as MI and matured to MII in vitro before ICSI showed lower developmental competence, including lower fertilization, blastocyst formation, and euploidy rates. However, euploid blastocysts from either cohort resulted in similar live birth rates, indicating that the MI oocytes with delayed maturation can still be useful even though the overall developmental competence was lower than that of their in vivo matured counterparts., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this review is to educate the reader on the role that cryopreservation has played and continues to play in the ever-evolving field of assisted reproductive technologies, specifically in clinical human fertility treatment. We discuss the science behind the cryopreservation methods and investigated some of the major considerations that any clinic or cryobank faces in terms of risks and liabilities, physical challenges that accompany the constantly growing collection of cryopreserved specimens, and what this means on the ethical and legal front. Finally, we take a glimpse in the future to explore what may be on the horizon for the preservation of gametes and reproductive tissues., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The aim of this article is to gather 9 thought leaders and their team members to present their ideas about the future of in vitro fertilization and the andrology laboratory. Although we have seen much progress and innovation in the laboratory over the years, there is still much to come, and this article looks at what these leaders think will be important in the future development of technology and processes in the laboratory., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The in vitro fertilization and andrology laboratories are at the center of assisted reproductive technologies and the place where technicians and embryologists manipulate gametes and preimplantation-stage embryos with the goal of achieving the best embryo for transfer. Through the years, these laboratories have seen developments in technique, technology, and testing. The goal of this Views and Interviews series is to bring together the thought leaders in the field and envision what the laboratories will look like in the next 10 years., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)