Search

Objective: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after bipolar radio frequency ablation and thermal balloon ablation in women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Teaching hospital. Patient(s): Women suffering from dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Intervention(s): Bipolar radio frequency ablation and thermal balloon ablation. Main outcome measure(s): Patients were asked to complete HRQoL questionnaires at baseline, and at 2 days, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. The questionnaires contained the medical outcomes study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), the Self-rating Depression Scale, the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and a structured clinical history questionnaire. Result(s): Data on HRQoL were available on at least two different time points in 115 of 126 randomized patients. HRQoL improved significantly over time in both groups, except for the domain of general health in the SF-36. None of the dimensions showed a significant difference between both groups, neither was there a significant interaction between time and treatment effect. Conclusion(s): Both methods significantly improved HRQoL in women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding. However, despite better amenorrhea and satisfaction rates after bipolar radio frequency ablation, there was no difference in HRQoL between the two groups. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To investigate patient preferences for endometrial ablation and a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (IUD) as alternatives to hysterectomy in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.Design: Comparative study based on structured interviews.Setting: A large teaching hospital with 500 beds in the Netherlands.Patient(s): Ninety-six patients who were scheduled for endometrial ablation, 25 patients who were scheduled for hysterectomy, and 23 patients who were scheduled for a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD were interviewed. All of the women had dysfunctional uterine bleeding.Intervention(s): Patients were asked to state their most significant complaints and their reasons for choosing a particular treatment. Subsequently, the preference for endometrial ablation and a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as alternatives to hysterectomy was assessed during a structured interview. Women were informed about the advantages and disadvantages of all three treatment options. Patients rated their preferences according to different hypothetical success rates. The success rates after endometrial ablation and levonorgestrel-releasing IUD were varied until patients found an acceptable treatment outcome.Main outcome measure(s): Patient preference of endometrial ablation and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD over hysterectomy.Result(s): The main reason for the treatment of choice differed between the three groups. Most of the patients in the hysterectomy group wanted a definite solution to their problems, whereas patients in the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD group and in the ablation group put greater emphasis on a minimally invasive intervention with or without a short hospital stay. In women undergoing ablation, 70% of the patients preferred this treatment and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD to hysterectomy in cases in which the success rate of noninvasive treatment was presumed to be 50%. In women having a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD inserted, 95% of the patients preferred this approach over hysterectomy in cases in which the success rate of this device was presumed to be 50%, whereas 35% of patients preferred ablation over hysterectomy in cases in which the success rate of ablation was presumed to be 50%. In women undergoing hysterectomy, 30% would have opted for ablation and 45% would have opted for a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD in cases in which success rates were 50%. Of patients who opted for hysterectomy, however, 60% stated that they would have preferred a noninvasive treatment if the success rate of this type of treatment were >80%.Conclusion(s): A majority of the patients who had dysfunctional uterine bleeding and who were scheduled for an endometrial ablation or a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD were inclined to take a risk of 50% likelihood of treatment failure to avoid a hysterectomy. As a consequence, research of treatment for dysfunctional uterine bleeding should focus on this 50% success level. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To assess the convenience and safety of Essure sterilization in an outpatient setting and the use of ultrasound as diagnostic tool for verification of proper placement for the 3-month follow-up. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Teaching hospital department of obstetrics and gynecology. Patient(s): Female patients with a request for permanent tubal sterilization. Intervention(s): Essure sterilization. Main Outcome Measure(s): Bilateral tubal occlusion after Essure sterilization and complication rate. Result(s): A total of 149 patients were scheduled for Essure sterilization. Microinsert placement was attempted in 143 patients. Bilateral placement of the device was successful in 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92%-99%). Seven attempts were unsuccessful. The complication rate was 2% (n = 3), and all involved a perforation. These three cases are discussed in detail. Vaginal ultrasound was conclusive in 91.7% (95% CI 87%-96%); two perforations were not recognized on the ultrasound. Conclusion(s): Essure sterilization is a safe and reliable sterilization method in an outpatient setting. Perforation of the device is the most frequent complication. Vaginal ultrasound is reliable for verification after an uncomplicated procedure. When the procedure is difficult (e.g., higher resistance, more pain then average, more time or more than two devices needed), a hysterosalpingogram should be performed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine whether intrauterine application of auto-crosslinked hyaluronic acid (ACP) gel, after dilatation and curettage (D&C), reduces the incidence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs).Design: Multicenter; women and assessors blinded prospective randomized trial.Setting: University and university-affiliated teaching hospitals.Patient(s): A total of 152 women with a miscarriage of <14 weeks with at least one previous D&C for miscarriage or termination of pregnancy.Intervention(s): Women were randomly assigned to either D&C plus ACP gel (intervention group) or D&C alone (control group). A follow-up diagnostic hysteroscopy was scheduled 8-12 weeks after the D&C procedure.Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was the number of women with IUAs and the secondary outcome was the severity of IUAs.Result(s): Outcomes were available for 149 women: 77 in the intervention group and 72 in the control group. The IUAs were observed in 10 (13.0%) and 22 women (30.6%), respectively (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.83). Mean adhesion score and the amount of moderate-to-severe IUAs were significantly lower in the intervention group according to the American Fertility Society (AFS) and European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy classifications systems of adhesions.Conclusion(s): Intrauterine application of ACP gel after D&C for miscarriage in women with at least one previous D&C seems to reduce the incidence and severity of IUAs but does not eliminate the process of adhesion formation completely. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the effect of ACP gel on fertility and reproductive outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration Number: NTR 3120. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]