Search

Background and objectivesFamily medicine clerkships depend heavily on community-based family physician preceptors to teach medical students. These preceptors have traditionally been unpaid, but in recent years some clerkships have started to pay preceptors. This study determines trends in the number and geographic region of programs that pay their community preceptors, identifies reasons programs pay or do not pay, and investigates perceived advantages and disadvantages of payment.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, electronic survey of 134 family medicine clerkship directors at allopathic US medical schools.ResultsThe response rate was 62% (83/132 clerkship directors). Nineteen of these (23%) currently pay community preceptors, 11 of whom are located in either New England or the South Atlantic region. Sixty-three percent of programs who pay report that their community preceptors are also paid for teaching other learners, compared to 32% of those programs who do not pay. Paying respondents displayed more positive attitudes toward paying community preceptors, though a majority of non-paying respondents indicated they would pay if they had the financial resources.ConclusionsThe majority of clerkships do not pay their community preceptors to teach medical students, but competition from other learners may drive more medical schools to consider payment to help with preceptor recruitment and retention. Medical schools located in regions where there is competition for community preceptors from other medical and non-medical schools may need to consider paying preceptors as part of recruitment and retention efforts.

Background and Objectives: Many medical student-patient encounters occur in the outpatient setting. Conference room staffing (CRS) of student presentations has been the norm in the United States in recent decades. However, this method may not be suitable for outpatient precepting, being inefficient and reducing valuable direct face time between physician and patient. Precepting in the Presence of the Patient (PIPP) has previously been found to be an effective educational model in the outpatient setting but has never been studied in family medicine clinics, nor with non-English speaking patients, nor patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds with low literacy.Methods: We used a randomized controlled trial of educational models comparing time spent using PIPP with CRS in two family medicine clinics. Patient, student, and physician satisfaction were also measured using a 5-point Likert scale; total encounter time and time spent precepting were also recorded.Results: PIPP is strongly preferred by attending physicians while patients and students were equally satisfied with either precepting method. PIPP provides an additional 3 minutes of physician-patient face time (17.39 versus 14.08 minutes) in an encounter that is overall shortened by 2 minutes (17.39 versus 19.71 minutes).Conclusions: PIPP is an effective method for precepting medical students in family medicine clinics, even with non-English speaking patients and those with low literacy. Given the time constraints of family physicians, PIPP should be considered as a preferred, time-efficient method for training medical students that is well received by patients, students, and particularly by physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: To ensure adequate observation, supervision, and mentoring of trainees, long-term preceptorships or apprenticeships are being reestablished in medical education. Equivalence in academic performance has been demonstrated between longitudinal students in the Rural Physician Associate Program (RPAP), who spend 9 months in a rural community during their third year of medical school, and their peers who complete their clerkships at different hospitals and clinics (traditional). We qualitatively reviewed the end of session Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for both groups and compared their performances., Methods: The high and low performers on four OSCE scenarios (cough, dysuria in a teen, preventive care in an older male, medication reconciliation) for two cohorts of students: longitudinal (n=47) and traditional primary care clerkship students (n=60) were selected for review. These 16 videotapes were reviewed independently by three researchers. The themes and subthemes were discussed over four meetings., Results: Both high and low scoring longitudinal students demonstrated more consistent use of rapport building skills. Longitudinal students appeared to have an effective pattern in their patient interactions and were more rehearsed at explaining preventive care recommendations such as the pros and cons of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Traditional students displayed a more complete mastery of the adolescent interview and followed a mnemonic taught during lecture., Conclusions: Qualitative assessment of OSCE data reveals information not captured in the quantitative scores. In this study, longitudinal students demonstrated better mastery of rapport building and content knowledge and had an effective routine to their patient encounters not evident in the traditional students' scenarios.

Background: Demonstrating the equivalency between the traditional metro-based clerkships within close proximity to the academic health center and the nontraditional rural preceptorships is important. The University of Minnesota has had a 9-month longitudinal rural elective for third-year medical students for 40 years, the Rural Physician Associate Program (RPAP). In the metro area, traditional students rotate through clerkships of 4 to 8 weeks in length. Both cohorts of students are evaluated in similar ways., Methods: We analyzed the test scores and demographic data for two cohorts of students: RPAP (n=201) and traditional (n=1,129) who graduated between 2004 and 2009. Tests included pre-medical school data (Medical College Admission Tests, college grade point averages) as well as National Board of Medical Examiners subject examinations (shelf), US Medical Licensing Examination Step One and Two (Clinical Knowledge and Clinical Skills), and an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Scores were analyzed using descriptive/comparative statistics for the two groups of students., Results: For the most part, RPAP students performed similarly to students in the traditional metro-based curriculum on the standard educational outcome metrics. On the obstetrics shelf, while a similar proportion of the RPAP students passed, they scored statistically significantly lower (traditional: median 72 (range 50-98) versus RPAP: 71 (51-89)., Discussion: This study is the largest cohort demonstrating equivalency between students taking a rural longitudinal clerkship and their metro-trained colleagues.