Search

Objectives: To assess intra-individually visual acuity (VA) and subjective outcome after mix-and-match implantation of a monofocal EDOF IOL and a diffractive trifocal IOL., Methods: The monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL was implanted in the dominant eye and the trifocal FineVision HP IOL in the non-dominant eye. Postoperative evaluation included VA at various distances, contrast acuity, monocular defocus curves, decentration and tilt, wavefront aberrometry, VF-7 questionnaire and a halo and glare simulator., Results: 50 eyes of 25 subjects were enroled. The trifocal IOL performed better at monocular DCNVA (p < 0.01) and at defocus levels of -1.5D to -4.0D (p < 0.01), the monofocal EDOF IOL was better at -0.5D (p = 0.013). No differences in monocular BCDVA, DCIVA, contrast acuity, decentration or tilt were observed (p > 0.05). Wavefront analysis revealed lower HOAs in the trifocal group at 5 mm (p < 0.01) and no difference (p = 0.107) at 3 mm pupil aperture. The monofocal EDOF IOL displayed increased negative SA at 5 mm (p < 0.01) and 3 mm (p < 0.01) pupil diameter. Low values of optical phenomena and satisfying results of the VF-7 questionnaire were obtained., Conclusion: Excellent visual performance and low rates of optical phenomena were achieved after mix-and-match implantation of the monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL and the trifocal FineVision HP IOL. Trifocal IOL implantation in the non-dominant eye may decrease optical disturbing phenomena. Similar results were observed for monocular distance, intermediate and contrast VA. The trifocal IOL provided better monocular near VA. Decentration and tilt and HOAs were low., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.)

Objectives: To evaluate the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates following implantation of two hydrophobic acrylic IOLs., Methods: In a randomized, controlled trial, 80 patients with bilateral senile cataract were implanted with the hydrophobic acrylic single-piece intraocular Lenses (IOLs) EyeCee One in one eye and iMics1 in the other. Outcomes of 39 patients (78 eyes) were evaluated after 3 years. Automated Quantification of After-Cataract (AQUA; for PCO occurrence), visual acuity, anterior fibrosis, capsule-optic edge interaction and distance between anterior and posterior capsule IOL surface were analysed., Results: After a mean follow-up of 38 ± 1.95 months, Nd:YAG capsulotomy occurred at a rate of 15.4% and 46.2% in the EyeCee One and iMics1 groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Respective mean PCO scores measured by AQUA were 1.57 ± 1.63 and 2.45 ± 1.44 (p = 0.019). A distinct gap between the anterior capsule and the IOL optic was present in 89% of eyes implanted with EyeCee One and 13% of iMics1 eyes. A gap between the posterior capsule and the posterior surface of the lens was observed in 76% of EyeCee One eyes and 35% of iMics1 eyes., Conclusions: Study findings suggest that PCO and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates are significantly lower in eyes implanted with the EyeCee One IOL compared to the iMics1 IOL. Optic sharpness and lens material seem to be the decisive factors, while the stepped edge beneath the haptic junction appeared to be ineffective.

Purpose: To quantify the biometric changes of ocular dimensions with mechanical elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in vivo, to get a better understanding of the elastic properties of the human ocular structures that may play a role in the pathogenesis of various diseases such as myopia or glaucoma., Methods: Changes in IOP were induced by a suction cup in 18 eyes under cycloplegia. Axial eye length (AEL) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured with non-invasive laser interferometry during elevation of the IOP 10 and 20 mmHg over baseline values and after a 10-min resting period., Results: IOP elevation of 10 and 20 mmHg respectively caused a significant increase of AEL of 23 mum (95% confidence interval: 14-34 microm) and 39 microm (confidence interval (CI): 28-51 microm). After mechanical oculopression, which resulted in an IOP reduction of -5.1 mmHg (CI: -6.3 to -4.0 mmHg) vsbaseline, a significant shortening of -7 microm (CI: -13 to 0 microm) was observed. The change in AEL correlated with the change in IOP (r=0.66, P=0.005). Furthermore, a significant increase in ACD of 30 microm (CI: 24-36 microm) was detected with IOP reduction after oculopression, but no change was seen during IOP elevation., Conclusions: Biometric changes of the human eye as a response to IOP changes were assessed in vivo. The correlation between change in AEL and IOP found emphasizes the need of in vivoocular rigidity measurements in the human eye.