Search

• 3 layer neural networks outperform other ML algorithms in automated assessments. • In subjective assignments, deep neural networks can improve score prediction. • Word embeddings and linguistic feature results in more precise text mining models. • Extraction and selection of appropriate features can improve results. Machine learning (ML) has recently gained popularity in a variety of domains for automating tasks. This has also been used in the evaluation of student responses/ assignments. This paper presents a qualitatively enhanced methodology for automated score prediction of subjective assignments. To consider all the major aspects of a human grader, 21 linguistic features related to syntactical, grammatical, sentimental, and readability are analyzed from the assignments. This study makes use of the ASAP competition dataset from Kaggle. The evaluation metric used is Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK), which measures the agreement between the human graded score and the predicted score. The effect of appropriate feature selection has been observed using Mutual Information Regression. Four ML algorithms are investigated on identified linguistic features. 3 Layer Neural Network with feature selection performed well among all chosen ML algorithms with average QWK of 0.678. To include the benefits of deep learning, a new hybrid model (LF-BiLSTM-att-FS) is proposed that combines a higher level deep neural network (DNN) with the selected features. Pre-trained Glove embedding is used to include contextual information of the text. The proposed model results demonstrated an improvement in overall accuracy, with an average QWK value of 0.768. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Feature selection in real-world data mining problems is essential to make the learning task efficient and more accurate. Identifying the best feature selection algorithm, among the many available, is a complex activity that still relies heavily on human experts or some random trial-and-error procedure. Thus, the automated machine learning community has taken some steps towards the automation of this process. In this paper, we address the metalearning challenge of recommending feature selection algorithms by proposing a novel meta-feature engineering model. Our model considers a broad collection of meta-features that enable the study of the relationship between the dataset properties and the feature selection algorithm performance in terms of several criteria. We arrange the input meta-features into eight categories: (i) simple, (ii) statistical, (iii) information-theoretical, (iv) complexity, (v) landmarking, (vi) based on symbolic models, (vii) based on images, and (viii) based on complex networks (graphs). The target meta-features emerge from a multi-criteria performance measure, based on five individual performance indexes, that assesses feature selection methods grounded in information, distance, dependence, consistency, and precision measures. We evaluate our proposal using a recently developed framework that extracts the input meta-features from 213 benchmark datasets, and ranks the assessed feature selection algorithms, to fill in the target meta-features in meta-bases. This evaluation uses five state-of-the-art classification methods to induce recommendation models from meta-bases: C4.5, Random Forest, XGBoost, ANN, and SVM. The results showed that it is possible to reach an average accuracy of up to 90% applying our meta-feature engineering model. This work is the first to use an extensive empirical evaluation to provide a careful discussion of the strengths and limitations of more than 160 meta-features. These meta-features, while designed to aid the task of feature selection algorithm recommendation, can readily be employed in other metalearning scenarios. Therefore, we believe our findings are a valuable contribution to the fields of automated machine learning and data mining, as well as to the feature extraction and pattern recognition communities. • A novel meta-feature engineering model recommends feature selection algorithms. • The proposal obtains promising results from 213 datasets with hit rates of up to 90%. • Some simple, landmarking, image, and graph-based input meta-features highlighted. • A multi-criteria performance measure rigorously assesses candidate algorithms. • Chains of binary or multiclass classifiers can efficiently rank candidate algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]