Search

Introduction: Platelets play a pivotal role in the occurrence of recurrent ischemic events in coronary artery disease patients who are treated with drug-eluting stents and are on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).Areas covered: High platelet reactivity (HPR) to adenosine diphosphate during clopidogrel therapy is a strong predictor of post-stenting ischemic event occurrences. However, uniform use of potent P2Y12 receptors blockers to overcome HPR is associated with elevated bleeding risk. Selective de-escalation of P2Y12 receptor blocker therapy based on PFT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with stenting has been shown to be associated with a similar risk of ischemic event occurrence but with a reduced risk of bleeding. This review aims to discuss the role of PFT in guiding DAPT in patients treated with DES. We searched electronic databases from January 2000 to December 2019 for literatures evaluating the role of platelet function assessment after drug eluting stents.Expert opinion: Platelet function guided therapy improves patient outcomes by lessening bleeding and limiting the overuse of highly potent P2Y12 inhibitors. Interest in this area of de-escalation of therapy will likely grow as the consequences of bleeding are better recognized and the cost of healthcare gains greater focus.

A P2Y12 inhibitor plus aspirin is the most widely used antiplatelet strategy to prevent adverse outcomes in the setting of atherothrombotic vascular disease. Areas covered: A paucity of robust evidence for an optimal dose, gastrointestinal toxicity, ineffectiveness in high-risk patients and interactions with other antiplatelet agents, are major controversies associated with aspirin therapy. Ticagrelor is a reversibly binding oral P2Y12 receptor blocker that mediates potent inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet function. It is more effective than clopidogrel in preventing thrombotic events in acute coronary syndrome patients. The absence of a beneficial effect for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in ACS observed in the North American subgroup of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial has been attributed to a higher concomitant aspirin dose. Expert commentary: Ongoing studies are now investigating the plausibility of removing aspirin therapy in the setting of potent P2Y12 receptor blockade via ticagrelor monotherapy or replacing aspirin with an oral anticoagulant.

Aspirin has been the bedrock of antiplatelet treatment strategies for the secondary prevention of recurrent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events for the last 3 decades. The limitations of standard aspirin therapy include bleeding, gastrotoxicity, and loss of antiplatelet effect over a 24-hour period in selected high-risk patients. An extended-release (ER) aspirin formulation, Durlaza® (New Haven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., North Haven, CT), has been developed to address some of the latter limitations and may provide an alternative to standard aspirin in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.We searched articles describing the use aspirin for secondary prevention of stroke and cardiovascular events in PubMed published until May 2016. This is a comprehensive review which describes active- and placebo-controlled clinical trials, overview of American and European recommendations, controversies surrounding standard aspirin use, and a description of pharmacodynamics of standard and extended release aspirin formulations. Expert commentary: Available data indicates an increased bleeding risk with the use of standard aspirin therapy in conjunction with potent P2Y12 receptor blockers, and/or oral anticoagulants. Trials evaluating the efficacy of replacing aspirin with a low-dose oral anticoagulant in patients with stable cardiovascular disease or acute coronary syndrome are ongoing. Future studies are warranted to determine if the use of ER-ASA formulation may obviate safety concerns surrounding standard aspirin therapy.

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, a platelet cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitor and P2Y12 receptor blockers, remains the major drug strategy to prevent ischemic event occurrence in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in patients undergoing coronary stenting, but there some limitations that can be overcome by targeting novel targets. Unlike direct thrombin inhibitors that bind directly to thrombin, targeting the platelet thrombin receptor, protease activated receptor (PAR)-1, may offer a better choice for the attenuation of atherosclerosis progression, thrombus-mediated ischemic events and restenosis without interfering with primary hemostasis. Vorapaxar - a synthetic analogue of himbacine, is a high affinity and highly selective PAR-1 antagonist that can effectively inhibit thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. In the TRACER trial, the addition of vorapaxar to standard therapy in patients with non-stent thrombosis-elevation- acute coronary syndromes did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, hospitalization for ischemia, or urgent revascularization, but significantly increased the GUSTO moderate and severe bleeding (p < 0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). In the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial, in patients with a history of MI and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (67% of the total population), the end point of CV death, MI, or stroke was significantly (20%) reduced with vorapaxar whereas GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding was increased (1.5-fold), but not ICH or fatal bleeding and the net clinical outcome favoring the vorapaxar therapy. Based on these favorable results, the FDA approved vorapaxar for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with prior MI or with PAD for long term therapy. A careful patient selection is needed to balance efficacy versus safety. At this time, patients with high risk for recurrent ischemic event occurrence such as patients with diabetes mellitus and previous MI can be safely treated with vorapaxar for long-term therapy.

The pivotal roles of platelets in physiological hemostasis and pathological thrombosis at the site of plaque rupture are well established. The latter roles provide the fundamental basis for the most widely implemented pharmacologic management of coronary artery disease--dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin to inhibit platelet thromboxane A2 generation, and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor to prevent adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet activation. Although suboptimal pharmacodynamic efficacy, also described as high on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP, has been associated with greater risk for post-stenting ischemic event occurrence, enhanced responsiveness is associated with higher risk for bleeding in selected patients. In this review article, we aim to provide an historical account of the one and a half century long journey starting with the first description of platelets through the first report of ex vivo measurement of ADP-induced platelet aggregation, the first demonstration of an association between ADP-induced platelet aggregation and post-stenting ischemic event occurrence, and finally to the most recent description of a 'therapeutic window' concept for P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy.

The pharmacologic management of patients with high-risk coronary artery disease consists of aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. Chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin is the major treatment strategy to attenuate thromboembolism or stroke in patients with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. A substantial percentage of the latter group of patients have coronary artery disease and may require stenting with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy in addition to therapy with warfarin to reduce arterial ischemic events in addition to stroke. These new oral anticoagulants have been developed for long-term therapy to overcome the limitations of warfarin. Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor and its role in patients with acute coronary syndrome is being explored.

Therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin, commonly known as dual antiplatelet therapy, is a widely adapted secondary prevention strategy among coronary artery disease patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. However, in addition to response variability and high on-treatment platelet reactivity and their relation to increased adverse events during clopidogrel therapy, candidate gene studies and genome-wide association studies have highlighted the significance of single nucleotide polymorphisms of genes associated with clopidogrel metabolism in coronary artery disease patients. Genotyping may have an emerging role in personalized antiplatelet therapy, particularly with the advent of new P2Y12 receptor blockers that have more rapid and potent pharmacodynamic properties than clopidogrel. The current review discusses the role of genotyping in personalizing P2Y12 receptor-blocker therapy.

Platelets play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Platelet adhesion and aggregate formation are critical events that occur in unstable coronary syndromes. Platelet activation precedes the formation of homotypic and heterotypic aggregates. In the last 10 years, researchers have described the presence of activated platelets in the systemic circulation in various cardiovascular disease states, particularly acute coronary syndromes. This review describes the evidence for platelet activation in acute myocardial ischemic syndromes, describes the pathophysiology responsible for its occurrence, and discusses how platelet activation and reactivity may affect the use of concomitant drug therapies and patient prognosis.

Current European atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines have assigned a strong recommendation for the initiation of antithrombotic therapy to prevent thromboembolism in all but those AF patients at low risk (or with contraindications). Furthermore, the selection of antithrombotic therapy is based on the absolute risks of thromboembolism and bleeding, and the relative risk and benefit for a given patient. By their very mechanism of action, antithrombotic agents used for stroke prevention in AF will potentially increase the risk of bleeding events. Moreover, the introduction of novel oral anticoagulation agents have introduced new, hitherto ill-defined, deficiencies in the authors' knowledge with respect to anticoagulation monitoring, availability of direct antidotes, drug-drug interactions and the ability to appropriately control and reverse their actions if bleeding events occur. The authors present a comprehensive review on all aspects of bleeding related to currently licensed antithrombotic agents used for stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Platelet activation and aggregation play important roles in ischemic event occurrences in patients with coronary artery disease. In the absence of a disease state and drug administration, platelet reactivity has been shown to be stable over time, indicating a high level of heritability. Interindividual variability in platelet response to agonists and in response to aspirin and clopidogrel administration along with the influence of different single nucleotide polymorphisms on platelet reactivity based on candidate gene and genome-wide association studies have been demonstrated in healthy subjects. Reduced pharmacodynamic effect and reduced clinical efficacy of clopidogrel have been well documented in high-risk coronary artery disease patients carrying a loss-of-function allele of the CYP2C19 gene. These factors are recognized by the recent American and European treatment guidelines. However, prasugrel and ticagrelor are associated with superior and predictable pharmacodynamic responses and better clinical outcomes compared with clopidogrel.

Therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin, commonly known as dual antiplatelet therapy, is a widely adapted secondary prevention strategy among coronary artery disease patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. However, in addition to response variability and high on-treatment platelet reactivity and their relation to increased adverse events during clopidogrel therapy, candidate gene studies and genome-wide association studies have highlighted the significance of single nucleotide polymorphisms of genes associated with clopidogrel metabolism in coronary artery disease patients. Genotyping may have an emerging role in personalized antiplatelet therapy, particularly with the advent of new P2Y₁₂ receptor blockers that have more rapid and potent pharmacodynamic properties than clopidogrel. The current review discusses the role of genotyping in personalizing P2Y₁₂ receptor-blocker therapy.