Search

A hallmark of movement control expressed by healthy humans is the ability to gradually improve motor performance through learning. In the context of object manipulation, previous work has shown that the presence of a torque load has a direct impact on grip-force control, characterized by a significantly slower grip-force adjustment across lifting movements. The origin of this slower adaptation rate remains unclear. On the one hand, information about tangential constraints during stationary holding may be difficult to extract in the presence of a torque. On the other hand, inertial torque experienced during movement may also potentially disrupt the grip-force adjustments, as the dynamical constraints clearly differ from the situation when no torque load is present. To address the influence of inertial torque loads, we instructed healthy adults to perform visually guided reaching movements in weightlessness while holding an unbalanced object relative to the grip axis. Weightlessness offered the possibility to remove gravitational constraints and isolate the effect of movement-related feedback on grip force adjustments. Grip-force adaptation rates were compared with a control group who manipulated a balanced object without any torque load and also in weightlessness. Our results clearly show that grip-force adaptation in the presence of a torque load is significantly slower, which suggests that the presence of torque loads experienced during movement may alter our internal estimates of how much force is required to hold an unbalanced object stable. This observation may explain why grasping objects around the expected location of the center of mass is such an important component of planning and control of manipulation tasks.

This paper investigates how the efficiency and robustness of a skilled rhythmic task compete against each other in the control of a bimanual movement. Human subjects juggled a puck in 2D through impacts with two metallic arms, requiring rhythmic bimanual actuation. The arms kinematics were only constrained by the position, velocity and time of impacts while the rest of the trajectory did not influence the movement of the puck. In order to expose the task robustness, we manipulated the task context in two distinct manners: the task tempo was assigned at four different values (hence manipulating the time available to plan and execute each impact movement individually); and vision was withdrawn during half of the trials (hence reducing the sensory inflows). We show that when the tempo was fast, the actuation was rhythmic (no pause in the trajectory) while at slow tempo, the actuation was discrete (with pause intervals between individual movements). Moreover, the withdrawal of visual information encouraged the rhythmic behavior at the four tested tempi. The discrete versus rhythmic behavior give different answers to the efficiency/robustness trade-off: discrete movements result in energy efficient movements, while rhythmic movements impact the puck with negative acceleration, a property preserving robustness. Moreover, we report that in all conditions the impact velocity of the arms was negatively correlated with the energy of the puck. This correlation tended to stabilize the task and was influenced by vision, revealing again different control strategies. In conclusion, this task involves different modes of control that balance efficiency and robustness, depending on the context.

In this experiment we examined the coupling between grip force and load force observed during cyclic vertical arm movements with a hand-held object, performed in different gravitational environments. Six subjects highly experienced in parabolic flight participated in this study. They had to continuously move a cylindrical object up and down in the different gravity fields (1g, 1.8 g and 0 g) induced by parabolic flights. The imposed movement frequency was 1 Hz, the object mass was either 200 or 400 g, the amplitude of movement was either 20 or 40 cm and an additional mass of 200 g could be wound around the forearm. Each subject performed the task during 15 consecutive parabolas. The coordination between the grip force normal to the surface and the tangential load force was examined in nine loading conditions. We observed that the same normal grip force was used for equivalent loads generated by changes of mass, gravity or acceleration despite the fact that these loads required different motor commands to move the arm. Moreover, our results suggest that the gravitational and inertial components of the load are treated adequately and independently by the internal models used to predictively control the required grip force. These results indicate that the forward internal models used to control precision grip take into account the dynamic characteristics of the upper limb, the object and the environment to predict the object's acceleration and, in turn, the load force acting at the fingertips.

Investigating cyclic vertical arm movements with an instrumented hand-held load in an airplane undergoing parabolic flight profiles allowed us to determine how humans modulate their grip force when the gravitational and the inertial components of the load force are varied independently. Eight subjects participated in this study; four had already experienced parabolic flights and four had not. The subjects were asked to move the load up and down continuously at three different gravitational conditions (1 g, 1.8 g, and 0 g). At 1 g, the grip force precisely anticipated the fluctuations in the load force, which was maximum at the bottom of the object trajectory and minimum at the top. When gravity changed, the temporal coupling between grip force and load force persisted for all subjects from the first parabola. At 0 g, the grip force was accurately adjusted to the two load force peaks occurring at the two opposite extremes of the trajectory due to the absence of weight. While the experienced subjects exerted a grip force appropriate to a new combination of weight and inertia since their first trial, the inexperienced subjects dramatically increased their grip when faced with either high or low force levels for the first time. Then they progressively released their grip until a continuous grip-load force relationship with regard to 1 g was established after the fifth parabola. We suggest that a central representation of the new gravitational field was rapidly acquired through the incoming vestibular and somatic sensory information.