Search

Using a bisection paradigm, we investigated age-related differences in susceptibility to distractor interference. Older and younger participants were asked to bisect a horizontal line flanked by a pair of distractors, placed in either left or right hemispace. The results showed that (1) in both groups the distractors interfered with line bisection so that the localization of subjective midpoint was selectively shifted away from their position; (2) the shifting of subjective midpoint was greater in the older than in the younger group when the distractors were placed in the left hemispace. We suggest that the increase of the bisection bias in the older group depends on changes in attentional mechanisms involved in inhibiting irrelevant information.

Healthy individuals typically show more attention to the left than to the right (known as pseudoneglect), and to the upper than to the lower visual field (known as altitudinal pseudoneglect). These biases are thought to reflect asymmetries in neural processes. Attention biases have been used to investigate how these neural asymmetries change with age. However, inconsistent results have been reported regarding the presence and direction of age-related effects on horizontal and vertical attention biases. The observed inconsistencies may be due to insensitive measures and small sample sizes, that usually only feature extreme age groups. We investigated whether spatial attention biases, as indexed by gaze position during free viewing of a single image, are influenced by age. We analysed free-viewing data from 4,243 participants aged 5-65 years and found that attention biases shifted to the right and superior directions with increasing age. These findings are consistent with the idea of developing cerebral asymmetries with age and support the hypothesis of the origin of the leftward bias. Age modulations were found only for the first seven fixations, corresponding to the time window in which an absolute leftward bias in free viewing was previously observed. We interpret this as evidence that the horizontal and vertical attention biases are primarily present when orienting attention to a novel stimulus - and that age modulations of attention orienting are not global modulations of spatial attention. Taken together, our results suggest that attention orienting may be modulated by age and that cortical asymmetries may change with age., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Previous studies suggest a right hemisphere advantage for temporal processing and a left hemisphere advantage for planning of motor actions. In the present study, we studied sensorimotor synchronization of hand reaching movements with an auditory rhythm. Blindfolded right-handed participants were asked to synchronize left and right hand movements to an auditory rhythm (40 vs. 60 vs. 80 bpm) and simultaneously reproduce the amplitude of a previously shown movement. Constant and variable asynchronies and movement amplitude errors were measured. The results showed that (a) constant asynchrony was lesser with the left hand than the right hand and (b) constant and variable amplitude errors were lesser with the right hand than the left hand. We suggest that when hand reaching movements are synchronized with an auditory rhythm, the left hand/right hemisphere system appears relatively specialized in temporally adhering to the rhythm and the right hand/left hemisphere system in performing spatially accurate movements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is generally accepted that visual illusions affect line bisection in the predicted direction. However, it has been reported an illusionary bias which seems questioning such general view. In a previous study, participants bisected lines flanked at both ends by two pairs of arrows, pointing in the same direction. The medialmost vertices of one pair converged on the line (converging arrows), whereas those of the other pair did not (non-converging arrows). Participants bisected lines toward the base of the arrows, i.e., toward the wider end of the stimulus and in the direction opposite to that predicted by the Baldwin illusion. However, the bisection bias was also directed away from the location of the converging arrows. We investigated what is the main factor affecting line bisection: arrows orientation, as previously suggested, or interference effects related to the location of converging arrows. In experiment 1, participants bisected lines flanked by converging versus non-converging arrows. Results confirmed the presence of a bisection bias directed not only toward the base of the converging arrows but also away from their location. In experiment 2, the arrows were located more internally, so that their medialmost vertices always converged on the line. Results showed that the bisection bias was directed away from the location of the arrows regardless of their orientation. It is suggested that the previously reported bisection bias did not depend on arrows orientation, but rather on interference effects related to converging arrows position. The theoretical implications of the results are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]