1. Enzalutamide in Combination with Abiraterone Acetate in Bone Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients
- Author
-
Ina N. Prokhorova, John C. Araujo, Christopher J. Logothetis, Mark Titus, Paul Corn, Eleni Efstathiou, Anh Hoang, Patricia Troncoso, Sijin Wen, Amal Melhem-Bertrandt, Carl Dmuchowski, and Shiva Patil
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.drug_class ,Urology ,Abiraterone Acetate ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Bone Neoplasms ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,Cmin ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Prednisone ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Nitriles ,Phenylthiohydantoin ,medicine ,Humans ,Enzalutamide ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,Abiraterone acetate ,Middle Aged ,Androgen ,medicine.disease ,Androgen receptor ,Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant ,Tolerability ,chemistry ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Benzamides ,Surgery ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is hypothesised that cotargeting the androgen receptor (AR) and paracrine androgen biosynthesis with enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) will dissipate adaptive feedback loops observed with either agent alone. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, efficacy, androgen signalling/metabolome, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of enzalutamide with abiraterone acetate in progressive bone mCRPC (bmCRPC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, single-centre interventional study was conducted in bmCRPC patients. INTERVENTION: Enzalutamide 160 mg and abiraterone acetate 1000 mg once daily; prednisone 5 mg twice daily. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Adverse events (AEs), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival (PFS), tumour biomarker/metabolite expression, and C(min) plasma concentrations were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sixty patients were enrolled. Common AEs independent of grade/causality included fatigue (72%), hyperglycaemia (67%), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) elevation (53%), and hot flush (43%). Grade 3 AEs included hypertension (17%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (12%), ALP elevation (5%), and arthralgia (5%). No treatment-related grade 4 AEs or deaths were reported. Median treatment-discontinuation time was 312 d (95% confidence interval [CI] 196.0–483.0). Maximal PSA decline ≥50% and ≥90% occurred in 46 (77%) and 29 (48%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 251 d (95% CI 147–337). At week 9, median tumour microenvironment androgens, precursors, and nuclear AR expression decreased (p < 0.001). The baseline tumour AR C/N terminal ratio of ≥80% was associated with treatment benefit. At enzalutamide steady state, abiraterone acetate C(min) was ~23% lower (range 14.05–200.5 ng/ml) than when given alone. CONCLUSIONS: Enzalutamide combined with abiraterone acetate has a manageable safety profile, without a meaningful DDI. Both agents are pharmacodynamically active with no feedback. Efficacy findings do not support significant benefit of combined treatment for unselected bmCRPC. PATIENT SUMMARY: This is the first study combining enzalutamide plus abiraterone in bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Results show that this combination is safe.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF