Search

Background: Transobturator male slings have been proposed to manage stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostatic surgery, but data are still lacking., Objective: To determine the safety and prospectively evaluate the clinical outcome after management of SUI after prostatic surgery by placement of a transobturator male sling., Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a prospective evaluation on 102 patients treated in a single center between 2007 and 2009 for mild to moderate SUI following prostatic surgery., Interventions: Placement of a suburethral transobturator sling and clinical follow-up., Measurements: Patients were evaluated by medical history, preoperative urodynamics, maximum flow rate measurement, 24-h pad test, and daily pad use. During follow-up, data on patients' pad use, complications, and answers to the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire were collected. Cure was defined as no pad usage or one pad for security reasons and improvement as reduction of pads≥50%. Median follow-up was 13 mo (range: 6-26)., Results and Limitations: Most patients (95%) presented post-radical prostatectomy incontinence (PRPI). Hospital stay was 2 d in 97 cases, and all patients were catheterized for 24h except two (48 h). Of 102 patients, 64 were cured, 18 were improved, and 20 were not improved. According to the PGI-I questionnaire, 85%, 11%, and 4% of patients described a respectively better, unchanged, and worse urinary tract condition, respectively. Previous radiation was associated with higher rate of failure (p=0.039). Neither severe complication nor postoperative urinary obstruction was noted during follow-up., Conclusions: Placement of a transobturator sling is a safe and effective procedure, giving durable results after >1 yr of follow-up. Further evaluation and high-quality controlled, randomized studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and precise indications of this procedure for post-prostatic-surgery SUI management.

Monoclonal antibody BL2-10D1 directed against a tumor-associated antigen of bladder carcinoma was used for monitoring 11 intravesically treated patients. Thirty-three bladder washout specimens were used for standard cytology and immunological staining. Prior to treatment, 9 of 11 cytologic specimens examined with standard cytology were found to be positive. Using BL2-10D1 alone, only 6 were positive but 1 patient negative with standard cytology was positive with the antibody and corresponded to a positive histological control. Thus, before treatment, an increase in positive rate was observed using the combination of the 2 methods from 82 to 91%. At the end of treatment, 9 washout specimens remained positive with standard cytology, whereas 1 case negative in standard cytology was positive in immunocytology. Thus, the positive rate increased from 82 to 91%. One month after the end of treatment, of 11 washout specimens tested, 3 false-negative standard cytologies and 4 false-negative immunocytologies were shown. However, used in combination, the two methods lead to an increase in positive rate from 67 to 89%. In view of these results, BL2-10D1 may be considered as a useful reagent in combination with the standard cytology for the confirmation of the presence of tumor cells before and after immunotherapy.