Search

From a normative vantage point post deliberative opinions should be linked to the quality of arguments presented during discussion. Yet there is a dearth of research testing this claim. Our study makes a first attempt to overcome this deficiency. By analyzing a European deliberative poll on third country migration we explore whether statements backed by reason affect opinions which we term deliberative persuasion. We contrast deliberative persuasion to non deliberative persuasion whereby we explore whether the most frequently repeated position influences opinions. We find that with regard to regularization of irregular immigrants deliberative persuasion took place. In the context of European involvement in immigration affairs however opinions are driven by the most frequently repeated position rather than by the quality of argumentation