Search

Objective: Massive bone loss is a serious problem in the elderly. Joint replacement with modular prostheses represents the most common reconstructive technique after oncological and non-oncological resections. Megaprostheses are broadly available, adaptable and versatile and allow early mobilization and rehabilitation. Although segmental endoprosthetic implants are now widely used and despite innovations, complications remain far high. Our purpose is to establish what happens to megaprostheses of a specific anatomical site in the long term in a population with oncologic and non-oncologic indications treated at a single center solely by a few skilled surgeons., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database. We collected 35 patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction exclusively of the proximal femur for neoplastic and non-neoplastic disease between 2008 and 2021. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Complications were collected and classified, and also adapted to the non-oncological setting., Results: Taking into consideration the entire population, 94% of this survived the follow-up at 6 months, subsequently 85% at 1 year and 82% at 2 years. At follow-ups after 5 years, 79% of megaprostheses showed no mechanical failure. Analyzing prosthetic survival in the two groups, this was >50% at 24 months after surgery in both groups, with better survival for the oncological one., Conclusions: Proximal femur replacement can be a valid option in treatment of oncological and non-oncological cases. Due to the high complication rate, only selected cases should undergo this kind of surgical procedure.

Objective: The use of megaprosthetic implants could provide substantial advantages in elderly population affected by complex fractures. The aim of the study was to identify the patients suitable to megaprosthetic implants in the treatment of lower limbs fractures, as well as periprosthetic fractures., Patients and Methods: From January 1st, 2015, to December 31st, 2021, all patients affected by femoral fractures with severe bone loss or previous surgery failure were retrospectively reviewed. ADL, IADL, SF-12 values pre- and post-operative were recorded. Hemoglobin value, NLR, PLR were recorded pre- and peri-operatively for all patients. Complications were recorded. All patients underwent a radiological follow-up. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05., Results: 23 patients were considered eligible, 10 males and 13 females; the mean age was 72.87 years old (± 12.33), while the mean BMI was 27.2 points (± 5.2). The mean follow-up was 2 years (± 1.4). The mean preoperative ADL and IADL scores were correlated with a positive independence of the patient, while the mean postoperative scores corresponded to a moderate-low independence. Also the mean Mental and Physical SF12 scores saw a decrease in values. NLR values were higher in the first group of patients with complications., Conclusions: A careful multiparametric and multidisciplinary patient selection is required to identify the suitable patient to this treatment.

Objective: Proximal femur fractures are among the most common type of trauma in elderly patients, and Euthyroid sick syndrome has already been related to fractures and trauma. The evidence of a consistent inflammatory state occurring during hip fracture, made us consider as a potential marker also the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which is already in use to measure the prognosis and guide the therapeutic management in various conditions., Patients and Methods: A retrospective observational analysis on patients affected by proximal femur fractures was conducted. Patients were divided between affected and non-affected by Euthyroid Sick Syndrome (ESS). Standard follow up was conducted at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months., Results: 79 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 19 males and 60 females, the mean age was 83.8 ± 6.5 y.o., and 44 patients were affected by ESS. Affected patients showed higher NLR values (10.2 ± 9.4 vs. 6.9 ± 3.9; p= 0.001) and higher decrease in fT3 values in the 1st post-operative day (1.8 ± 0.4 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3; p= 0.001), higher values of PTH (97.9 ± 46.2 vs. 70.1 ± 36.2; p=0.004) and lower levels of Vitamin D (18.8 ± 7.8 vs. 23.5 ± 12.9; p= 0.04). As regards complications, we found them in 27% of patients in group A, while only in 8% in Group B, with a statistically significant difference (p= 0.03)., Conclusions: ESS and NLR are promising prognostic markers in PFF in the elderly patients. If used together, they could help in the pre- and post-operative management of the patients.