Search

The most important factor for the prognosis of occupational asthma is the length of exposure with symptoms prior to removal from exposure. We wanted to identify factors, including socioeconomic status, that can influence the delay in submitting a claim to a medicolegal agency after the onset of asthmatic symptoms, and to confirm that this delay is associated with worse respiratory prognosis and higher direct costs. This is a cross-sectional study of subjects who claimed compensation for occupational asthma at the Workers' Compensation Board of Quebec, Canada. Data were collected at re-evaluation ∼2.5 yrs after diagnosis. Information on the number of years with symptoms and removal from exposure was obtained from the medicolegal file. 60 subjects were included in the study. Being older, having a revenue of >30,000 Canadian dollars and having occupational asthma due to high molecular weight agents were all positively associated with the number of years of exposure with symptoms before removal from exposure. Subjects with persistent airway hyperresponsiveness at follow-up had a higher number of years with symptoms. Experiencing symptoms in the workplace for <1 yr generated lower direct costs. These findings might help in surveillance programmes that could be preferentially targeted for these subgroups of workers.

The diagnosis of occupational asthma can be made by exposing workers to the relevant agent either in a hospital laboratory through specific inhalation challenges (SICs) or in the workplace. As suggested by several authors, workers with negative laboratory SIC can be monitored at the workplace under supervision. The present study aims to assess the frequency of, and identify factors associated with, a positive workplace reaction in workers with negative SIC in the laboratory. The results of workplace challenges were examined in 99 workers who underwent negative SIC between 1994 and 2004. A positive reaction either in the SIC or in the workplace was defined as a sustained fall in forced expiratory volume in one second of > or =20%. In total, 22 (22.2%) workers showed positive responses at the workplace. These subjects more often had increased baseline methacholine responsiveness (90.5 versus 67.6%). They also underwent more days of SIC testing (4.9 versus 3.3 days) and were exposed more often to two or more agents (56 versus 28.4%) and for a longer period of time (363.3 versus 220.4 min) in the laboratory. The present study illustrates the usefulness of workplace monitoring of airway function in the investigation of occupational asthma and identifies factors that are more often associated with a positive reaction.

Subjects with occupational asthma (OA) are often left with permanent sequelae after removal from exposure, and assessing their impairment/disability should utilise various tools. The aim of the present study was to examine whether: 1) assessment of inflammation in induced sputum is relevant to impairment; and 2) use of questionnaires on quality of life and psychological factors can be useful for the evaluation of disability. In total, 40 subjects were prospectively assessed for permanent impairment/disability due to OA 2 yrs after cessation of exposure. Impairment was assessed as follows: 1) need for asthma medication; 2) asthma severity; 3) airway calibre and responsiveness; and 4) degree of inflammation in induced sputum. Disability was assessed according to quality of life and psychological distress. There was a significant improvement in airway responsiveness and inflammation from diagnosis to the present assessment. Sputum eosinophils > or =2% and neutrophils >60% were present in eight (20%) and 12 (30%) out of all subjects, respectively, one or the other feature being the only abnormalities in 15% of subjects. Quality of life was moderately affected and there was a prevalence of depression and anxiety close to 50%. In the assessment of subjects with occupational asthma, information on airway inflammation and psychological impacts are relevant to the assessment of impairment/disability, although these findings need further investigation.

The present study assessed the usefulness of key items obtained from a clinical "open" questionnaire prospectively administered to 212 subjects, referred to four tertiary-care hospitals for predicting the diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA). Of these subjects, 72 (34%) were diagnosed as OA (53% with OA due to high-molecular-weight agents) according to results of specific inhalation challenges, and 90 (42%) as non-OA. Wheezing at work occurred in 88% of subjects with OA and was the most specific symptom (85%). Nasal and eye symptoms were commonly associated symptoms. Wheezing, nasal and ocular itching at work were positively, and loss of voice negatively associated with the presence of OA in the case of high-, but not low molecular-weight agents. A prediction model based on responses to nasal itching, daily symptoms over the week at work, nasal secretions, absence of loss of voice, wheezing, and sputum, correctly predicted 156 out of 212 (74%) subjects according to the presence or absence of OA by final diagnosis. In conclusion, key items, i.e. wheezing, nasal and ocular itching and loss of voice, are satisfactorily associated with the presence of occupational asthma in subjects exposed to high-molecular-weight agents. Therefore, these should be addressed with high priority by physicians. However, no questionnaire-derived item is helpful in subjects exposed to low-molecular-weight agents.

Serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) assessment has been proposed in the clinical evaluation of asthma. In subjects attending the asthma clinic of a tertiary care hospital, we wanted to assess: 1) compliance in performing PEF; and 2) accuracy of a PEF-diary. Twenty adult asthmatic subjects, all using inhaled steroids, were asked to assess their PEF in the morning and evening with a VMX instrument (Clement Clarke Int., Colombus, OH, USA). This instrument, which incorporates a standard mini-Wright peak flow meter, stores PEF data on a computer chip. Subjects were not informed that the values were being stored. The mean duration of PEF monitoring was 89 days (range 44-131 days). For the total of 20 subjects, it was estimated that 3,482 values should have been written down and stored on the VMX computer chip. Whilst 1,897 values (54%) were written down, only 1,533 (44%) were stored, 425 values being invented. Morning and evening values were stored on 34% of days; and values were stored at least once a day on 55% of days. The values written down corresponded precisely to stored values 90% of the time, and were within +/- 20 L 94% of the time. We conclude that: 1) compliance with daily peak expiratory flow assessments is generally poor in chronic stable asthmatic subjects assessed on two visits separated by a 3 month period; and 2) a substantial percentage of values (22%) is invented. The unsatisfactory compliance with peak expiratory flow monitoring in this group of asthmatics on inhaled steroids underlines the need for similar studies on peak expiratory flow monitoring as part of an action treatment plan, and in more severe and brittle asthmatics.

Airflow obstruction has been described in workers who experienced symptoms after acute exposure to chlorine. Persistent bronchial hyperresponsiveness has also been assessed, but mainly in case studies. In this cross-sectional study, we have assessed the relationship between inhalational accidents ("puffs") involving chlorine and persistent symptoms as well as hyperresponsiveness in 239 out of 255 at-risk workers (94%). No relationship was found between persistent symptoms and the exposure variables studied. Forced vital capacity (FVC) was higher in subjects who had had no symptoms after a "puff", compared with those who had experienced mild symptoms. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and FVC were significantly lower in subjects who experienced more than 10 puffs with mild symptoms than in subjects who reported no symptomatic puff. The presence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness was not related to exposure, but the methacholine dose-response slope showed a tendency to increased bronchial responsiveness with increased exposure. A significant difference was shown in subjects who experienced more than 10 puffs with mild symptoms. In this group of workers, repeated exposure to chlorine with acute respiratory symptoms was associated with a slight but significant reduction in expiratory flow rates, together with an increase in bronchial responsiveness, without long-term symptoms.

The sensitivity and specificity of monitoring peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) and bronchial responsiveness to the provocative concentration of histamine or methacholine (PC20) has been determined as compared to specific inhalation challenges in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. A prospective study of 61 subjects referred for occupational asthma to various agents was performed. PEFR was assessed every 2 h during a period away from work for at least 2 weeks. The period at work was 2 weeks, or less if there was increased symptomatology or marked changes in PEFR. At least one PC20 assessment was obtained at work and away from work. Graphs of PEFR and PC20 values were interpreted in blind fashion by three experienced readers. There was complete agreement among the three in 54 out of 61 instances (78%). Twenty five out of 61 subjects (41%) had positive specific inhalation challenges. The best index for comparing results of PEFR with specific inhalation challenges was the visual analysis of PEFR with sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 74%. All of the numerical indices were significantly less satisfactory. We conclude that visual analysis of PEFR is an interesting tool for investigating occupational asthma, although sensitivity and specificity values do not seem satisfactory enough to warrant using it alone.

The aim of this study was to find out if bronchodilatation following deep inspiration can be induced by the inhalation of a "natural" stimulus (hyperventilation of cold dry air), and if the effect is similar to that induced by methacholine. After baseline assessment of lung resistance (RL), 10 asthmatic subjects were asked to inhale cold dry air for 3 min. RL was monitored continuously for 3-4 min, at which time subjects were asked to take a fast deep inspiration. After recovery, the manoeuvre was repeated and RL was reassessed. The manoeuvre was then repeated a third time. After functional recovery, progressive doses of methacholine were inhaled until the increase in RL was comparable to that obtained after hyperventilation (56 +/- 16% and 65 +/- 24%, respectively, mean +/- SD, NS). The same deep inspiration manoeuvre was repeated three times with recovery as after hyperventilation of cold dry air. Maximum changes in RL were not significantly different after each of the three manoeuvres for either type of bronchoconstriction. The mean fall in RL was 14.2 +/- 9.9% after hyperventilation and 16.4 +/- 10.5% after methacholine. There was a satisfactory correlation (r = 0.80, p less than 0.01) between the bronchodilatation after deep inspiration for both types of stimuli. We conclude that the bronchodilator effect of deep inspiration is no different using either a pharmacological stimulus (methacholine) or a "natural" stimulus (hyperventilation of unconditioned air). These results show that assessing the response to hyperventilation with manoeuvres requiring deep inspiration, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) may alter airway tone in a way similar to pharmacological stimuli.

The timecourse of recovery from bronchial obstruction due to inhaled cold air was studied in eight adult asthmatic subjects. On the first visit, bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine was assessed. On the other two visits, after assessment of baseline lung resistance (RL) and spirometry, dry cold (-20 degrees C) air was inhaled for three minutes. RL was monitored continuously until its return to baseline +/- 20%. The baseline concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) varied from 0.03 to 5.9 mg.ml-1. The mean maximum increase in RL was 2-fold (2.03 +/- 0.41) and was reached 2-11 min after the challenge. RL values were linearly correlated to time (r2 values greater than 0.80 in 14/16 instances). The two slopes of recovery were not significantly different. Slopes of recovery and total time of recovery (14-55 min) varied greatly between subjects. No relationship was found between baseline airway calibre, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and maximal increase in baseline RL on the one hand and the slopes of recovery on the other.