Search

Background: Understanding why patients with severe asthma do not follow healthcare provider (HCP) advice to adjust treatment is critical to achieving personalised disease management., Methods: We reviewed patient choice to follow HCP advice to adjust asthma treatment in a UK-based randomised, controlled, single-blind (study participant), multicentre, parallel group 48-week clinical study comparing biomarker-directed treatment adjustment with standard care in severe asthma., Results: Of 1572 treatment advisories (291 participants), instructions were followed in 1377 cases (87.6%). Patients were more likely to follow advice to remain on treatment (96.7%) than to either reduce (70.3%) or increase (67.1%) their treatment, with 64% of patients following all treatment advice. Multivariate analysis associated belonging to an ethnic minority group (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.68-5.73) and prior study medication changes (two or more changes: OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.51-5.10) with failure to follow treatment advice. In contrast, emergency room attendance in the prior year (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.92) was associated with following treatment advice. The largest effect was seen with transition onto or off oral corticosteroids (OR 29.28, 95% CI 16.07-53.36) when compared with those requested to maintain treatment. Centre was also an important determinant regarding the likelihood of patients to follow treatment advice., Conclusions: Belonging to an ethnic minority group and multiple prior treatment adjustments were associated with not following HCP treatment advice. Patients also responded differently to HCP advice across UK specialist centres. These findings have implications for the generalisability of models of care in severe asthma and require further focused studies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J. Busby has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.G. Matthews has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Chaudhuri reports grants, personal fees for advisory board work and nonfinancial support for meeting attendance from AstraZeneca, personal fees for advisory board work from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, personal fees for advisory board work and nonfinancial support for meeting attendance from Chiesi, nonfinancial support for meeting attendance from Napp Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I.D. Pavord reports personal fees for lectures, advisory board honoraria, sponsorship to attend scientific meetings, and payments for organising educational events from AstraZeneca, personal fees for lectures, advisory board honoraria, and sponsorship to attend scientific meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees for lectures from Aerocrine and Chiesi, personal fees for lectures and advisory board honoraria from Almirall and Novartis, advisory board honoraria from Genentech, Regeneron, Sanofi, Circassia and Knopp, personal fees for lectures, payments for organising educational events, and sponsorship to attend scientific meetings from Teva, grants from the National Institute for Health Research, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: T.C. Hardman has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.R. Arron has patents “Diagnosis and treatments relating to Th2 inhibition” (US 9,684,000 B2) and “Diagnosis and treatments relating to Th2 inhibition” (US 9,995,755 B2) issued with rights assigned to Genentech, a member of the Roche group, and is an employee of Genentech, Inc. and owns stocks/options in the Roche group. Conflict of interest: P. Bradding reports grants from Genentech, other (consultancy work on behalf of the University of Leicester) from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C.E. Brightling reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, Chiesi, Genentech, Gossamer, Mologic and 4D Pharma, all paid to the institution and outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D.F. Choy is an employee of Genentech, Inc. and owns stocks/options in the Roche group. Conflict of interest: D.C. Cowan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Djukanovic reports receiving fees for lectures at symposia organised by Novartis, AstraZeneca and Teva, consultation for Teva and Novartis as member of advisory boards, and participation in a scientific discussion about asthma organised by GlaxoSmithKline; he is a co-founder and current consultant, and has shares in Synairgen, a University of Southampton spin-out company. Conflict of interest: C.E. Hanratty has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T.W. Harrison reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Vectura, Synairgen and Chiesi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C.T. Holweg is an employee and stock owner of Genentech Inc., a member of the Roche Group, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P.H. Howarth reports employment by GlaxoSmithKline. Conflict of interest: S.J. Fowler reports personal fees for lectures and support to attend an international conference from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures, participation in an advisory board, and support to attend an national conference from Chiesi, personal fees for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Teva, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.L. Lordan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.H. Mansur reports personal and institution payment for talks, advisory board meetings, sponsorship to attend conferences and education grants for service developments from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva and others, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Menzies-Gow reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and Vectura, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Teva and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R.M. Niven has received lecture fees, advisory board activity and been supported to attend international meetings/conferences in the last 5 years by the following companies: AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Boston Scientific, Chiesi, Napp, Novartis and Teva. None of these have any relevance to the manuscript; R.M. Niven owns no shares or stocks and is not personally or in any family way connected to any pharmaceutical companies. Conflict of interest: D.S. Robinson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.M. Walker has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Woodcock reports personal fees for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees for lectures and consultancy from Novartis, personal fees for consultancy from Chiesi, other (chairing research projects) from Reacta Biotech, Axalbion and Medicines Evaluation Unit, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L.G. Heaney reports other (sponsorship for meeting attendance) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline and Napp Pharmaceutical, personal fees for lectures and advisory board work from Novartis, Hoffman la Roche/Genentech Inc., Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Teva, Theravance and Circassia, grants from Medimmune, Novartis UK, Roche/Genentech Inc., and GlaxoSmithKline, and is academic lead for the Medical Research Council Stratified Medicine UK Consortium in severe asthma, which involves industrial partnerships with Amgen, Genentech/Hoffman la Roche, AstraZeneca, Medimmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Aerocrine and Vitalograph, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Mast cell-airway smooth muscle (ASM) interactions play a major role in the immunoglobulin (Ig)E- dependent bronchoconstriction seen in asthma but less is known about IgE-independent mechanisms of mast cell activation. Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 4 (TRPV4) activation causes contraction of human ASM via the release of cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) but the mechanism is unknown. The objective of the present study was to investigate a role for IgE-independent, mast cell-ASM interaction in TRPV4-induced bronchospasm.Bronchoconstriction was measured in anaesthetised guinea pigs and contraction of human and guinea-pig airway tissue assessed using isometric tension measurements. Increases in intracellular [Ca 2+ ] were imaged using the Ca 2+ -sensitive dye FURA2, and time-lapse ptychography was utilised as a surrogate for contraction of ASM cells.The TRPV4 agonist GSK1016790A caused contraction in vivo in the guinea pig, and in human and guinea-pig tracheal tissue, which was inhibited by the TRPV4 antagonist GSK2193874. GSK1016790A increased [Ca 2+ ] i and released ATP in human ASM cells without causing contraction. TRPV4 and ATP evoked contraction in isolated tracheal tissue but co-culture experiments indicated a requirement for human lung mast cells. Expression profiling and pharmacological studies demonstrated that mast cell activation was dependent upon ATP activating the P2X4 receptor. Trypsin was shown to evoke contraction of tracheal tissue via activation of PAR-2-TRPV4-ATP-cysLT axis indicating the potential disease relevance of this signalling pathway.TRPV4 activation increases [Ca 2+ ] i and releases ATP from ASM cells triggering P2X4-dependent release of cysLTs from mast cells resulting in ASM contraction. This study delineates a novel mast cell-ASM interaction and TRPV4 as a driver of IgE-independent mast cell-dependent bronchospasm., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S.J. Bonvini is employed by AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: M.A. Birrell is employed by AstraZeneca and was a non-executive director of an Imperial College spinout contract research company engaged in respiratory pre-clinical work. Conflict of interest: E. Dubuis has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.J. Adcock is employed by AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: M.A. Wortley has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Flajolet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Bradding has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.G. Belvisi reports grants from Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council, during the conduct of the study; is employed by AstraZeneca and was a non-executive director of an Imperial College spinout contract research company engaged in respiratory pre-clinical work, and has been a consultant for Ario Pharma, Aboca, Patara, NeRRe, MedImmune and Boehringer Ingelheim., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Airway remodelling in asthma remains poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the association of airway remodelling measured on bronchial biopsies with 1) lung function impairment and 2) thoracic quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-derived morphometry and densitometry measures of proximal airway remodelling and air trapping.Subjects were recruited from a single centre. Bronchial biopsy remodelling features that were the strongest predictors of lung function impairment and QCT-derived proximal airway morphometry and air trapping markers were determined by stepwise multiple regression. The best predictor of air trapping was validated in an independent replication group.Airway smooth muscle % was the only predictor of post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) % pred, while both airway smooth muscle % and vascularity were predictors of FEV 1 /forced vital capacity. Epithelial thickness and airway smooth muscle % were predictors of mean segmental bronchial luminal area (R 2 =0.12; p=0.02 and R 2 =0.12; p=0.015), whereas epithelial thickness was the only predictor of wall area % (R 2 =0.13; p=0.018). Vascularity was the only significant predictor of air trapping (R 2 =0.24; p=0.001), which was validated in the replication group (R 2 =0.19; p=0.031).In asthma, airway smooth muscle content and vascularity were both associated with airflow obstruction. QCT-derived proximal airway morphometry was most strongly associated with epithelial thickness and airway smooth muscle content, whereas air trapping was related to vascularity., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com, (Copyright ©ERS 2017.)

Severe asthma represents a major unmet clinical need. Eosinophilic inflammation persists in the airways of many patients with uncontrolled asthma, despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS) are a family of molecules involved in the regulation of cytokine signalling via inhibition of the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription pathway. We examined SOCS expression in the airways of asthma patients and investigated whether this is associated with persistent eosinophilia.Healthy controls, mild/moderate asthmatics and severe asthmatics were studied. Whole genome expression profiling, quantitative PCR and immunohistochemical analysis were used to examine expression of SOCS1, SOCS2 and SOCS3 in bronchial biopsies. Bronchial epithelial cells were utilised to examine the role of SOCS1 in regulating interleukin (IL)-13 signalling in vitroSOCS1 gene expression was significantly lower in the airways of severe asthmatics compared with mild/moderate asthmatics, and was inversely associated with airway eosinophilia and other measures of T-helper type 2 (Th2) inflammation. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated SOCS1 was predominantly localised to the bronchial epithelium. SOCS1 overexpression inhibited IL-13-mediated chemokine ligand (CCL) 26 (eotaxin-3) mRNA expression in bronchial epithelial cells.Severe asthma patients with persistent airway eosinophilia and Th2 inflammation have reduced airway epithelial SOCS1 expression. SOCS1 inhibits epithelial IL-13 signalling, supporting its key role in regulating Th2-driven eosinophilia in severe asthma., (Copyright ©ERS 2016.)

The mechanism of chronic mast cell activation in asthma is unclear. Monomeric immunoglobulin (Ig)E in the absence of allergen induces mediator release from rodent mast cells, indicating a possible role for IgE in the continued activation of mast cells within the asthmatic bronchial mucosa. In this study it was investigated whether monomeric IgE induces Ca2+ influx and mediator release from human lung mast cells (HLMC). Purified HLMC were cultured for 4 weeks and then exposed to monomeric human myeloma IgE. Ratiometric Ca2+ imaging was performed on single fura-2-loaded cells. Histamine release was measured by radioenzymatic assay; leukotriene C4 (LTC4) and interleukin (IL)-8 were measured by ELISA. At concentrations experienced in vivo, monomeric IgE induced dose-dependent histamine release, LTC4 production and IL-8 synthesis. This was associated with a rise in cytosolic free Ca2+. Enhanced histamine release was still evident 1 week after initial exposure to IgE suggesting that continued exposure maintains enhanced secretion. Monomeric immunoglobulin E alone activates cultured human lung mast cells initiating Ca2+ influx, degranulation, arachidonic acid metabolism and cytokine synthesis. These findings support the hypothesis that immunoglobulin E loading of mast cells within the asthmatic airway contributes to the disordered airway physiology of this disease.

Salmeterol xinafoate is an inhaled long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist recently introduced for the treatment of asthma. Both in vitro and animal studies suggest that it may have anti-inflammatory activities of benefit in this disease. To assess this directly, the effects of 6 weeks' treatment with salmeterol on indices of clinical activity, airway dysfunction and inflammation in subjects with stable atopic asthma were investigated. In a double blind study, asthmatic patients were randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with either salmeterol 50 microg twice daily (n=14) or placebo (n=12). They underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and bronchial biopsy immediately before starting treatment and again after 6 weeks. Treatment with salmeterol improved clinical indices of asthma activity, but there were no changes in BAL differential cell counts or mediator levels, and no change in T-cell numbers or activation status. In the biopsy specimens there were no changes in numbers of inflammatory cells, sub-basement membrane collagen deposition or mast cell degranulation. Regular treatment with salmeterol improves clinical indices of asthma but has no effect on the underlying inflammatory process. These findings strengthen guideline recommendations that long-acting beta2-agonists should not be prescribed as sole antiasthma medication.