Search

To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) for automatic detection of bone metastases on CT.This retrospective study included CT scans acquired at a single institution between 2009 and 2019. Positive scans with bone metastases and negative scans without bone metastasis were collected to train the DLA. Another 50 positive and 50 negative scans were collected separately from the training dataset and were divided into validation and test datasets at a 2:3 ratio. The clinical efficacy of the DLA was evaluated in an observer study with board-certified radiologists. Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate observer performance.A total of 269 positive scans including 1375 bone metastases and 463 negative scans were collected for the training dataset. The number of lesions identified in the validation and test datasets was 49 and 75, respectively. The DLA achieved a sensitivity of 89.8% (44 of 49) with 0.775 false positives per case for the validation dataset and 82.7% (62 of 75) with 0.617 false positives per case for the test dataset. With the DLA, the overall performance of nine radiologists with reference to the weighted alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figure of merit improved from 0.746 to 0.899 (p.001). Furthermore, the mean interpretation time per case decreased from 168 to 85 s (p = .004).With the aid of the algorithm, the overall performance of radiologists in bone metastases detection improved, and the interpretation time decreased at the same time.• A deep learning-based algorithm for automatic detection of bone metastases on CT was developed. • In the observer study, overall performance of radiologists in bone metastases detection improved significantly with the aid of the algorithm. • Radiologists' interpretation time decreased at the same time.

To compare observer performance of detecting bone metastases between bone scintigraphy, including planar scan and single-photon emission computed tomography, and computed tomography (CT) temporal subtraction (TS). Data on 60 patients with cancer who had undergone CT (previous and current) and bone scintigraphy were collected. Previous CT images were registered to the current ones by large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping; the registered previous images were subtracted from the current ones to produce TS. Definitive diagnosis of bone metastases was determined by consensus between two radiologists. Twelve readers independently interpreted the following pairs of examinations: NM-pair, previous and current CTs and bone scintigraphy, and TS-pair, previous and current CTs and TS. The readers assigned likelihood levels to suspected bone metastases for diagnosis. Sensitivity, number of false positives per patient (FPP), and reading time for each pair of examinations were analysed for evaluating observer performance by performing the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Figure-of-merit (FOM) was calculated using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. The sensitivity of TS was significantly higher than that of bone scintigraphy (54.3% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.006). FPP with TS was significantly higher than that with bone scintigraphy (0.189 vs. 0.0722, p = 0.003). FOM of TS tended to be better than that of bone scintigraphy (0.742 vs. 0.691, p = 0.070). Sensitivity of TS in detecting bone metastasis was significantly higher than that of bone scintigraphy, but still limited to 54%. TS might be superior to bone scintigraphy for early detection of bone metastasis. • Computed tomography temporal subtraction was helpful in early detection of bone metastases. • Sensitivity for bone metastasis was higher for computed tomography temporal subtraction than for bone scintigraphy. • Figure-of-merit of computed tomography temporal subtraction was better than that of bone scintigraphy.

To assess whether temporal subtraction (TS) images of brain CT improve the detection of suspected brain infarctions. Study protocols were approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this study. Forty-two sets of brain CT images of 41 patients, each consisting of a pair of brain CT images scanned at two time points (previous and current) between January 2011 and November 2016, were collected for an observer performance study. The 42 sets consisted of 23 cases with a total of 77 newly developed brain infarcts or hyperdense artery signs confirmed by two radiologists who referred to additional clinical information and 19 negative control cases. To create TS images, the previous images were registered to the current images by partly using a non-rigid registration algorithm and then subtracted. Fourteen radiologists independently interpreted the images to identify the lesions with and without TS images with an interval of over 4 weeks. A figure of merit (FOM) was calculated along with the jackknife alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity, number of false positives per case (FPC) and reading time were analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The mean FOM increased from 0.528 to 0.737 with TS images (p < 0.0001). The mean sensitivity and FPC improved from 26.5% and 0.243 to 56.0% and 0.153 (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.239), respectively. The mean reading time was 173 s without TS and 170 s with TS (p = 0.925). The detectability of suspected brain infarctions was significantly improved with TS CT images. • Although it is established that MRI is superior to CT in the detection of strokes, the first choice of modality for suspected stroke patients is often CT. • An observer performance study with 14 radiologists was performed to evaluate whether temporal subtraction images derived from a non-rigid transformation algorithm can significantly improve the detectability of newly developed brain infarcts on CT. • Temporal subtraction images were shown to significantly improve the detectability of newly developed brain infarcts on CT.

Temporal subtraction of CT (TS) images improves detection of newly developed bone metastases (BM). We sought to determine whether TS improves detection of BM by radiology residents as well. We performed an observer study using a previously reported dataset, consisting of 60 oncology patients, each with previous and current CT images. TS images were calculated using in-house software. Four residents independently interpreted twice the 60 sets of CT images, without and with TS. They identified BM by marking suspicious lesions likely to be BM. Lesion-based sensitivity and number of false positives per patient were calculated. Figure-of-merit (FOM) was calculated. Detectability of BM, with and without TS, was compared between radiology residents and board-certified radiologists, as published previously. FOM of residents significantly improved by implementing TS (p value