Search

SummaryThe stigmatisation of the psychiatric patient is still a strong barrier to the integration process of these subjects in our society. Therefore, it is necessary to identify what types of prejudices exist and the types of variables with which they are linked, in order to plan strategies to reduce them. In this exploratory study we administered a semi-structured interview to 303 subjects in order to examine the relationships between social attitudes towards mental disorders and some social demographic variables, the information about mental disorders and the previous ‘contacts’ with psychiatric patients.The data analysis shows that there is a relationship between knowledge of psychiatric patients and a more positive attitude towards them (i.e., less fear, more integration and work opportunities). This study is to be considered preliminary as far as people’s attitudes towards psychiatric patients are concerned. This result encourages the planning and implementation of sensitisation and information programs concerning mental disorders, in the sense that increasing the knowledge of mental disorders could lead to significant achievements in the important fight against the stigma surrounding psychiatric patients.

Background Recent reviews of evidence-based guidelines for the clinical management of Bipolar Disorders (BD) have recommended that “all patients with BD should be offered group or individual psychoeducation” to prevent relapse, improve treatment adherence, quality of life and functioning. The present study aimed at evaluating the psychoeducation in routine mental health. Methods One hundred and two outpatients were recruited from two Italian DMHs. Inclusion criteria were a lifetime diagnosis of BD type I or II assessed by SCID-I, being euthymic for at least 3 months. Exclusion criteria were a DSM-IV Axis I comorbidity, mental retardation (IQ Results Data show that the number of patients hospitalized during the 1-year follow-up, the mean number of hospitalizations per patient and the mean number of days in hospital were significantly lower for psychoeducated patients. Conclusion Our study supports the view that group psychoeducation is an efficacious intervention to prevent patients’ hospitalization and decrease hospital days in pharmacologically treated patients with bipolar disorder, also in routine clinical settings. The results seem to confirm that the psychoeducation promotes an improvement in the course of illness, avoiding acute phases, and producing a greater stabilization of the disease and consequently an improvement in quality of life in people with BD.

Introduction PERDOVE study is a prospective observational cohort study, which providing follow-up at one year, aims to investigate the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in in the 23 medium-long term RFs of the St John of God Order. Objectives (1) To describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related characteristics of RF-patients during an index period in 2010; (2) to identify predictors and characteristics associated with discharge at 1-year follow-up; (3) to evaluate clinicians’ predictions about each patient's likelihood of Home Discharge (HD). Methods All patients staying in September 2010 with a primary psychiatric diagnosis received a set of standardized assessment instruments, including a “Patient Schedule”, BPRS, HONOS, PSP, PHI, and SLOF. Detailed socio-demographic and clinical data were also collected. Logistic regression analyses were run to identify independent discharge predictors. Results The study involved 403 patients. 66,7% is male, mean age is 49 (±10). 70.7% is unmarried. The average duration of illness of these patients is 23 years. Primary diagnosis is represented by schizophrenic spectrum disorders (67.5%). At 1 year follow-up, 104 patients (25.8%) were discharged: 13.6% to home, 8.2% to other RFs, 2.2% to supported housing, and 1.5% to prison. Conclusions The main variables associated with a higher likelihood of being discharge to home were: to have an illness duration of less than 15 years and to have an available and effective social support in the last year. Lower severity of psychopathology, and higher working skills were also associated with a significantly higher likelihood to be discharged to home.

Introduction Persons with severe mental disorders and a history of violent offending are usually seen as a difficult-tomanage population: most have schizophrenia or severe affective disorders, while some suffer from severe personality disorders. Aims To investigate the sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related characteristics of a sample of patients living in RFs with a history of antisocial behaviour (‘violent’ group); to compare the characteristics of the ‘violent’ group with residents never violent; and to compare the rate of violent behaviour in the two groups over two years and to assess the likelihood of discharge in the two groups. Methods This is prospective observational cohort study involved 23 RFs of the St John of God Order in Northern Italy. The sample was divided into two groups: non-violent patients and ‘violent’ patients. The last included patients at last one time admitted in FMH or arrested for violent crimes or acted violent behaviors against people. For each inpatient was filled out a “Patient Schedule”: socio-demographic and clinical data were collected, including a specific session to assess aggressive behavior lifetime and in the last year. Results The study involved 403 patients: 89 ‘violents’ and 314 non-violent. ‘Violent’ group was mainly male, younger, with a prevalence of personality disorders. Coherently, in the group of ‘violent’ there were more people lifetime arrested and admitted to a FMH. Discussion There are some differences in the monitoring of violent behavior in the two years of assessment. We observed more threatening, slap, punch, inappropriate sexual harassment, etc. in the ‘violents’ group.