Search

The quark condensate and quark number density are commonly used to determine the QCD phase transition. However, the usually defined quark condensate is divergent in the case of non-chiral limit, and the quark number density suffers from the superficial divergence in numerical calculation. In order to address these issues, we redefine the quark condensate at finite temperature and density and propose a technique to deal with the divergence of the quark condensate and the superficial divergence of the quark number density in numerical calculations. Based on these improvements, we further discuss various susceptibilities as criteria to determine the critical points in the phase transition. It is found that different susceptibilities give different locations of the critical points in the crossover region, which suggests us to define a critical band, instead of some exclusive line in the phase diagram. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Solutions and their evolutions of the quark gap equation are studied within the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, which is a basic issue for studying the QCD phase structure and locating the possible critical end point. It is shown that in the chiral limit case of the vacuum, chiral symmetry will hold if the coupling strength G is small, then the system only has the Wigner solution at M=0. If increasing G, two symmetric minima will appear as the positive and “negative” Nambu solutions, however, the solution M=0 now corresponds to a maximum instead of a minimum of the thermodynamical potential, so is not a physically stable state anymore (we call it “pseudo-Wigner solution”). Besides, it is shown that as the current quark mass m increases, the pseudo-Wigner solution will become negative, and disappear together with the negative Nambu solution if m is large enough. Similar things happen if we increase the temperature or quark chemical potential μ. Some interesting phenomenon is, from some μ a second local minimum will show up. As μ increases gradually, it will be stabler than the Nambu solution, survives even the Nambu solution disappears, and approaches m, which are just the features of the Wigner solution we expect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]