Search

The paper re-assesses (the non-monetary part of) Carl Menger's Grundsätze (1871). It begins by pointing out that representatives of the so-called "German Use Value School" elaborated the theory of marginal utility prior to Menger. The paper then turns to Menger's criticism of the theories of value and distribution of the classical economists and draws the attention to some important misunderstandings by him. After a summary account of Menger's alternative construction, the paper informs about the criticisms put forward against it especially by his two main students, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk and Friedrich von Wieser. It is then argued that contrary to Menger's view, relative prices reflect inter alia the substances that "transmigrate" into commodities in the course of production. Despite the numerous objections levelled at it, the Grundsätze are nevertheless a "great" work, because it invites to correct what is problematic in it and develop what is sound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction to the journal is presented in which the author discusses the various articles published within the issue on such topics as Karl Marx's manuscripts, economics, and authorship.

The MEGA2 edition is a watershed in interpreting important aspects of Marx's oeuvre, but not all of them. It provides hints as to why Marx failed to complete his magnum opus, Capital, and informs about his doubts regarding the "law of motion" of capitalism centred on the "law of the falling tendency of the rate of profit" he was keen to establish. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper discusses David Ricardo's analytical achievements. These concern his approach to the theory of value and distribution; his analysis of the effects of different forms of technical progress on income distribution; his analysis of exhaustible resources in terms of differential rent; his discussion of machinery and induced technical progress; and his theory of foreign trade and the principle of comparative advantage. It is argued that Ricardo's analysis has been frequently misrepresented and is a great deal more sophisticated than is commonly acknowledged. There are still ideas in his writings that have yet to be fully explored. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The paper reports on Jacob H. Hollander's cooperation with John Maynard Keynes and Piero Sraffa in the preparation of the latter's edition of The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. The report is based on archive material from various sources, including the unpublished papers of Edwin Cannan, Piero Sraffa, Jacob H. Hollander, John Maynard Keynes, and Jacob Viner, and the archive of the Royal Economic Society. The archive material consulted by us shows that, put mildly, Jacob H. Hollander did not promote Sraffa's editorial project: he held back material which he had received from Frank Ricardo and did not disclose to Sraffa that he owned several important letters which he had privately purchased. Moreover, Sraffa was refused access to Ricardiana even after he had traced them down in laborious detective work to be in Hollander's possession. Hollander's unwillingness to cooperate with Sraffa considerably delayed the publication of the Ricardo edition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper discusses the differences between the theories of value and distribution of Jean-Baptiste Say and David Ricardo. The attention focuses on fundamental issues in controversy between them. These are Say's confounding of 'value', 'riches' and 'utility', the theory of value, the problem of the measure of value, and the distinction between net and gross revenue; and the theory of income distribution, especially the explanation of rents and of profits. Since Say variously expressed his wish to learn from Ricardo and to absorb his doctrine, the aim of the paper is essentially to examine whether he made any progress in this regard. Whenever possible we let the authors speak for themselves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Provides information on Sraffa's contributions using material from his unpublished papers. Focuses on Sraffa's rediscovery of the distinct character of the classical theory of value and distribution and his refutation of the Marshallian interpretation; Further examines Sraffa's demand and supply theory and his reformulation of the classical theory.

The paper recalls some of the achievements of Friedrich Benedikt Wilhelm Hermann, a remarkable German economist whose work, once praised by authors such as von Th&umarc;nen, Menger, Marshall and Schumpeter, has largely fallen into oblivion. The emphasis is on Hermann's contributions to the theory of capital, profits and relative prices. It is argued that Hermann's writings reflect a period of upheaval, both theoretically and socio-economically — a period of transition from classical to marginalist economics and one in which the 'social question' became ever more pressing. On the one hand Hermann contributed to the development of the classical theory of value and distribution, and on the other he prepared the ground for the replacement of that theory by marginal productivity theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on the economic thought introduced by Karl Marx. Commentary on Marx's interpretation of physiocrats; Application of the economic theory; Study of political economics by Marx.

Focuses on the conventional neoclassical interpretation of von Neumann's growth model. Impact of capital endowment in productive capacity; Application of relative scarcity to determine interest rate; Comparison between superposed price system and von Neumann analysis.