1. Metal artifact reduction using iterative CBCT reconstruction algorithm for head and neck radiation therapy: A phantom and clinical study
- Author
-
Masashi Yagi, Shingo Ohira, Hayate Washio, Yuhei Koike, Yuya Nitta, Kentaro Wada, Masahiro Morimoto, Yoshinori Funama, Teruki Teshima, Tsukasa Karino, Yoshihiro Ueda, Hiroaki Shimamoto, Masayoshi Miyazaki, and Shoki Inui
- Subjects
Artifact (error) ,Cone beam computed tomography ,Phantoms, Imaging ,business.industry ,Truebeam ,Reconstruction algorithm ,Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ,General Medicine ,Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ,Imaging phantom ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,Metal Artifact ,0302 clinical medicine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Hounsfield scale ,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Artifacts ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Algorithms ,Image-guided radiation therapy - Abstract
Purpose To investigate whether a novel iterative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstruction algorithm reduces metal artifacts in head and neck patient images. Method An anthropomorphic phantom and 35 patients with dental metal prostheses or implants were analyzed. All CBCT images were acquired using a TrueBeam linear accelerator and reconstructed with a Feldkamp–Davis–Kress algorithm-based CBCT (FDK-CBCT) and an iterative CBCT algorithm. The mean Hounsfield unit (HU) and standard deviation values were measured on the tongue near the metal materials and the unaffected region as reference values. The artifact index (AI) was calculated. For objective image analysis, the HU value and AI were compared between FDK-CBCT and iterative CBCT images in phantom and clinical studies. Subjective image analyses of metal artifact scores and soft tissue visualizations were conducted using a five-point scale by two reviewers in the clinical study. Results The HU value and AI showed significant artifact reduction for the iterative CBCT than for the FDK-CBCT images (phantom study: 389.8 vs.−10.3 for HU value, 322.9 vs. 96.2 for AI, FDK-CBCT vs. iterative CBCT, respectively; clinical study: 210.3 vs. 69.0 for HU value, 149.6 vs. 70.7 for AI). The subjective scores in the clinical patient study were improved in the iterative CBCT images (metal artifact score: 1.1 vs. 2.9, FDK-CBCT vs. iterative CBCT, respectively; soft tissue visualization: 1.8 vs. 3.6). Conclusions The iterative CBCT reconstruction algorithm substantially reduced metal artifacts caused by dental metal prostheses and improved soft tissue visualization compared to FDK-CBCT in phantom and clinical studies.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF