Search

Purpose: ANALI-scores are two prognostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based scores developed for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Our study aims to assess the interreader agreement between expert radiologists of the two ANALI-scores and of the radiological parameters they utilize, and to test the prognostic performance of the scores in our population., Method: Three radiologists evaluated MRIs of 98 PSC-patients from a prospectively collected cohort with median follow-up of 6.7 years. Each parameter of ANALI-scores was assessed, and the scores were calculated. Interreader agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). After consensus reading was reached, the prognostic value of ANALI-scores was assessed with Cox regression, and outcome-free survival rates were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier estimates., Results: The ANALI-score without gadolinium had poor to moderate (ICC = 0.56, 95 %CI: 0.42-0.68) and with gadolinium poor (ICC = 0.30, 95 %CI: 0.16-0.44) agreement. Liver deformity (ICC = 0.28, 95 %CI: 0.13-0.44) and parenchymal enhancement heterogeneity (ICC = 0.24, 95 %CI: 0.12-0.38) had poor agreement. Portal hypertension had poor to moderate (ICC = 0.48, 95 %CI: 0.36-0.59) and dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts had moderate (ICC = 0.64, 95 %CI: 0.54-0.73) agreement. Hazard ratios for liver-related death, transplantation or cirrhosis decompensation of the ANALI-scores with and without gadolinium were 3.53 (95 %CI: 1.40-8.93) and 2.25 (95 %CI: 1.56-3.24), respectively. Outcome-free survival was better for patients with low ANALI-scores., Conclusions: The ANALI-scores show poor to moderate agreement, which challenges their usefulness in clinical practice. They are associated with clinical outcomes, confirming the value of imaging in prognosis of PSC, but need further multicenter evaluation., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: First, to evaluate and describe the clinical and MRI progression of patients with small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis (sdPSC), and second, to look for MRI features associated with disease progression to large duct PSC., Method: 16 patients (7 female, 9 male; median age 27 years) with diagnosis of sdPSC and available MR imaging were included in this retrospective dual-center study. Liver function tests (LFTs) and imaging was reviewed in consensus by two radiologists at baseline and follow-up, and compared by means of non-parametric tests, with p < 0.05 deemed significant., Results: At baseline and follow-up patients had a cholestatic liver profile with elevated LFTs. Progressive liver deformity, heterogeneous enhancement and hilar lymphadenopathy were common findings. In 9 patients follow-up MRI was available with a mean interval between imaging of 10.6 years (range 3.6-15.3 years). 5 patients (55.5 %) developed cholangiographic changes diagnostic of large duct PSC. No correlation was observed between MRI findings or LFTs at baseline and the endpoint of developing PSC typical cholangiographic changes at follow-up imaging (p > 0.05)., Conclusions: More than half of sdPSC patients developed cholangiographic changes, supporting that sdPSC may be an early stage of large duct PSC rather than an entity of its own. Larger studies are needed to address the value of MRI for prediction of sdPSC disease progression., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest We confirm that this article is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and has not been published previously. Each author has participated sufficiently in the submission to take public responsibility for its content. Publication is approved by all authors and the responsible authorities where the work was carried out. The authors have no conflict of interest in relation to this work., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the interreader agreement and reader performance in the evaluation of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) in two classification systems of local resectability status prior to initiation of therapy, namely the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Karolinska classification system (KCS)., Methods: In this ethics review board-approved retrospective study, six radiologists independently evaluated pancreatic CT-examinations of 30 patients randomly selected from a tertiary referral centre's multidisciplinary tumour board database. Based on well-defined criteria of tumour-vessel relationship, each patient was assigned to one of three NCCN and six KCS categories. We assessed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared the percentages of correct tumour classification of the six readers in both systems (Chi-square test; a P-value <0.05 was considered significant). The standard of reference was a consensus evaluation of CT-examinations by three readers not involved in the image analysis., Results: The ICC for NCCN and KCS was 0.82 and 0.84, respectively (very strong agreement). The percentages of correct tumour classification at NCCN and KCS were 53-83% and 30-57%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences in the overall reader comparison per classification system. In pair-wise comparison between readers for NCCN/KCS, there were statistically significant differences between reader 5 vs. readers 4 (P = 0.012) and 3 (P = 0.045)/ reader 5 vs. reader 4 (P = 0.037)., Conclusion: Interreader agreement in both PC classification systems is very strong. NCCN may be advantageous in terms of reader performance compared to KCS., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)