Search

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incremental value of arterial and equilibrium phase compared to hepatic venous phase multidetector row CT (MDCT) in the preoperative staging of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and to determine the influence of the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive CLM patients underwent 16 detector row CT in hepatic arterial, venous, and equilibrium phase before surgery between March 2003 and January 2007. Detected lesions were characterized by three independent radiologists. The reference standard consisted of intraoperative palpation and ultrasound of the liver, and histopathological examination of the resected specimen. Additionally, data of follow-up CT was added. Statistical analysis was performed on a per-lesion basis. RESULTS: According to the reference standard 251 lesions were present, of which 203 (81%) were malignant (mean size: 29.4 ± 22.5 mm), and 41 (16%) were benign (mean size: 8.3 ± 7.7 mm). Sensitivity rates for CLM were comparable between triphasic and hepatic venous phase CT (P>0.05). Sensitivity for the detection of CLM lowered from 60-77% to 52-68% when follow-up CT was added to the reference standard. CONCLUSION: Arterial and equilibrium phase CT have no incremental value compared to hepatic venous phase MDCT in the detection of CLM. Sensitivity rates are, however, influenced by the type of reference standard used.

Objectives Radiologic surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can provide information on the extent and location of disease recurrence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to give an overview of the literature on the diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities for the detection of recurrent disease after surgery for PDAC. Methods A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library up to 20 December 2017. All studies reporting on the diagnostic value of imaging modalities for the detection of local and/or distant disease recurrence during follow-up after resection of PDAC were eligible. Both histologic confirmation of recurrent PDAC and clinical confirmation by disease progression on follow-up imaging were considered as suitable reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used for critical appraisal of methodological quality. Diagnostic accuracy data were extracted or calculated and presented in forest plots. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Results A total of seven retrospective studies with 333 relevant patients were ultimately eligible for data extraction. Overall, the methodological quality of the included studies was acceptable. All seven articles described test results of contrast-enhanced CT, whilst five and three articles reported outcomes on diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET-CT and FDG PET-CT combined with contrast-enhanced CT, respectively. For CT, pooled estimates for sensitivity were 0.70 (95% CI 0.61–0.78) and for specificity 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.88). For FDG PET-CT, pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 (95% CI 0.81–0.93) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.94), respectively. For FDG PET-CT in combination with contrast-enhanced CT, pooled estimates for sensitivity were 0.95 (95% CI 0.88–0.98) and for specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.63–0.92). Conclusions According to the current literature, post-operative CT has a moderate diagnostic accuracy in the detection of recurrent disease. FDG PET-CT imaging could be of additional value when disease recurrence is suspected despite negative or equivocal CT findings. Nevertheless, evidence supporting radiologic surveillance after resection of PDAC is limited. Future prospective studies are needed to optimize surveillance strategies after resection of pancreatic cancer.

Background Substantial recurrence rates following partial liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRM) imply that small metastases remain undetected using intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional value of contrast enhanced IOUS (CE-IOUS) when compared to preoperative contrast enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and IOUS in liver surgery for CRM. Methods After obtaining informed consent, 39 consecutive patients with CRM were included prospectively for evaluation. The study population consisted of 26 male and 13 female patients with a median (range) age of 62 (49–83) years. A lesion-per-lesion analysis was performed with histopathological examination as the reference standard after resection and follow-up for unresected lesions. The added value of CE-IOUS in correctly diagnosing malignant lesions was statistically evaluated, using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results A total of 234 lesions were identified, 137 of which were malignant, according to the reference standard. The addition of CE-IOUS did not improve the diagnostic accuracy when compared to the combination of CE-CT and IOUS (P = 0.617). In one of two patients with newly detected lesions on CE-IOUS the extent of resection changed. Conclusions The addition of CE-IOUS to preoperative CE-CT and IOUS does not improve the ability to characterize already detected lesions. In a small number of patients it appears to facilitate the detection of new metastatic lesions with implications on surgical strategy.

Objective: Assessment of the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US), single photon-emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) and F-18-fluorocholine (FCH) PET-CT for preoperative localization of hyper-functioning parathyroid(s) in order to create a more efficient diagnostic pathway and enable minimal invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) in patients with biochemical proven non-familial primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). Methods: A single-institution retrospective study of 63 consecutive patients with a biochemical diagnosis of non-familial pHPT who received a Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT-CT and neck ultrasound. Surgical findings were used in calculating the sensitivity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of both imaging modalities. Furthermore we present 5 cases who received additional FCH PET-CT. Results: A total of 42 (66.7%) patients underwent MIP. The PPV and sensitivity of SPECT-CT, 93.0% and 80.3%, were significantly higher than those of US with 78.3% and 63.2%, respectively. Adding US to SPECT-CT for initial pre-operative localization did not significantly increase sensitivity but did significantly decrease PPV. Performance of US was significantly better when performed after SPECT-CT. 18F-fluorocholine PET-CT localized the hyper-functioning parathyroid gland in 4/5 cases with discordant conventional imaging, enabling MIP. Conclusion: SPECT-CT is the imaging modality of choice for initial pre-operative localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid gland(s) in patients with biochemical pHPT. Ultrasound should be performed after SPECT-CT for confirmation of positive SPECT-CT findings and for pre-operative marking allowing MIP. In cases with negative or discordant imaging additional FCH PET-CT should be considered since this might enable the surgeon to perform MIP. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Objective : To assess the accuracy of large-core needle biopsy in evaluating palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions. Methods and patients : Stereotaxic and ultrasound (US) guided core biopsies were performed in 103 breast lesions in 97 patients. Subsequently, all patients underwent surgery. All specimens (core biopsy and surgical) underwent radiography for evaluation of microcalcifications. The histopathologic findings of the core biopsies and the surgical specimens were correlated. Results : Core biopsies and surgery findings were concordant in 100% of the 27 palpable lesions and in 89% of the 76 nonpalpable lesions. One case of malignancy, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), was not diagnosed by core biopsy. In 102 (99%) of the 103 breast lesions, a correct choice for additional diagnostic procedure or definitive treatment could have been made upon histopathologic findings of core biopsy. Conclusion : Stereotaxic and ultrasound-guided core biopsy are safe, reliable and less traumatic than excisional biopsy. Special attention is necessary when atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or DCIS without invasive carcinoma is found. Radiography of the biopsy specimens for detection of microcalcifications is essential.