Search

Background: Within the European Union (EU), substantial efforts are being made to achieve economic and social cohesion, and the reduction of health inequalities between EU regions is integral to this process. This paper is the first to examine how self-reported conditions and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) vary spatially between and within countries. Methods: Using 2014 European Social Survey (ESS) data from 20 countries, this paper examines how regional inequalities in self-reported conditions and NCDs vary for men and women in 174 regions (levels 1 and 2 Nomenclature of Statistical Territorial Units, 'NUTS'). We document absolute and relative inequalities across Europe in the prevalence of eight conditions: general health, overweight/obesity, mental health, heart or circulation problems, high blood pressure, back, neck, muscular or joint pain, diabetes and cancer. Results: There is considerable inequality in self-reported conditions and NCDs between the regions of Europe, with rates highest in the regions of continental Europe, some Scandinavian regions and parts of the UK and lowest around regions bordering the Alps, in Ireland and France. However, for mental health and cancer, rates are highest in regions of Eastern European and lowest in some Nordic regions, Ireland and isolated regions in continental Europe. There are also widespread and consistent absolute and relative regional inequalities in all conditions within countries. These are largest in France, Germany and the UK, and smallest in Denmark, Sweden and Norway. There were higher inequalities amongst women. Conclusion: Using newly available harmonized morbidity data from across Europe, this paper shows that there are considerable regional inequalities within and between European countries in the distribution of self-reported conditions and NCDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context/problem: Comparative analysis of relative and absolute mortality differentials between socioeconomic groups are now available. These show consistently increasing relative increases in mortality differentials but complex trends in absolute mortality differentials. Objective: This paper provides an analysis of relative and absolute trends in mortality by cause of death and socioeconomic group (SEG) from 1984 to 2008 among men and active women aged 30-64 years in Ireland and compares these results with recent European and US studies to give an overview of trends. Methods: This paper uses mortality data from the Irish Central Statistics Office from 1984 to 2008 to calculate standardized death rates by age, sex, socioeconomic status and cause of death showing trends in SEG inequalities in mortality in Ireland. These show which specific causes of death are driving all-cause mortality trends. Results: SEG differentials in all-cause mortality among men and women have been increasing since the 1980s. Some of this increase reflects larger falls in cardiovascular causes among advantaged groups, but the trend is largely accounted for by increasing inequalities in mortality in digestive, neoplasm and external causes of deaths. Conclusions: These findings are in line with international findings that show that socioeconomic differentials in digestive, neoplasm and external cause deaths are driving general socioeconomic differentials in all-cause mortality. External cause deaths may have been influenced by levels of economic activity, particularly in construction, during the economic boom among manual workers. Furthermore, deaths from digestive diseases during the 1990s and 2000s may well be the result of increases in liver disease associated with excessive alcohol consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Demonstrating long-term impacts of research can be fraught with methodological challenges, especially when approached retrospectively. Potential accusations of bias or over-interpretation, and a lack of clear and specific causal data, can be real obstacles. This paper presents a case study of research impact, including enablers and context to aid interpretation. To develop a national set of child wellbeing indicators in line with UNCRC commitments, a participative study of children’s understandings of wellbeing was undertaken to accompany a Delphi study with experts. The children contributed a number of unique indicators, including having ‘good places to spend free time’. Methods: Public actions which aimed to meet Irish commitments to child wellbeing were documented. Collected evidence comprised the development of, and reporting on, a national set of wellbeing indictors for children, the development and implementation of two national policies and cyclical monitoring data, collected through the nationally representative data sets of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in Ireland, 2002-2018. Results: Measurement of stakeholder-informed indicators helped stimulate national policies on play (2004) and recreation (2007). Partnership-based policy implementation led to increases in spaces for play and recreation. Trends data from the HBSC study revealed significant and meaningful increases in ‘good places to go spend free time’ for children aged 10-17 from 45.1% in 2002 to 63.5% in 2018, and for all sociodemographic sub-groups. Temporal analyses showed that increases followed policy implementation. Conclusions: This impact case study links an original participative study, though policy development and implementation, to long-term improvements in Irish children reporting having ‘good places to spend free time’. An understanding of the decision-making context at key points is important to aid interpretation of the evidence under investigation. Key messages: · Commitment to child participation influenced national indicator adoption, policy development and implementation, with subsequent improvements to children’s healthrelated environments. ·The quality and specificity of data needed to demonstrate long-term research impact is challenging and interpretation requires contextualisation to avoid leaps of faith. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on public health research, specifically on the inequalities and regional differences in health. One study explored the differences in morbidity and mortality within various Protestant denominations in Northern Ireland. Another paper focused on the contribution of causes of death to inequalities in mortality in Scotland, taking into consideration the impact at different ages for men and women.