Search

Background & Purpose: The constant emergence and broad toxicological effects of synthetic cannabinoids create a discernible public health threat. The synthetic cannabinoid AMB-FUBINACA (AMB-FUB) is a potent agonist at the CB 1 receptor and has been associated with numerous fatalities. Synthetic cannabinoids are commonly abused alongside other drugs and medications, including a "party pill" drug, para-fluorophenylpiperazine (pFPP), and the antipsychotic risperidone. This research aimed to investigate the mechanisms underpinning AMB-FUB toxicity and the impact of clinically relevant co-exposures in vivo., Experimental Approach: Male and female C57Bl/6 mice received a single dose of AMB-FUB (3 or 6 mg kg -1 ), pFPP (10 or 20 mg kg -1 ) or vehicle intraperitoneally. Mice were co-exposed to AMB-FUB (3 mg kg -1 ) and pFPP (10 mg kg -1 ) or risperidone (0.5 mg kg -1 ) to investigate these drug combinations. To study receptor-dependency and potential rescue of AMB-FUB toxicity, rimonabant (3 mg kg -1 ) was administered both pre- and post-AMB-FUB. Adverse effects caused by drug administration, including hypothermia and convulsions, were recorded., Key Results: AMB-FUB induced CB 1 -dependent hypothermia and convulsions in mice. The combination of AMB-FUB and pFPP significantly potentiated hypothermia, as did risperidone pre-treatment. Interestingly, risperidone provided significant protection from AMB-FUB-induced convulsions in female mice. Pre- and post-treatment with rimonabant was able to significantly attenuate both hypothermia and convulsions in mice administered AMB-FUB., Conclusion & Implications: Factors such as dose, CB 1 signalling, and substance co-exposure significantly contribute to the toxicity of AMB-FUBINACA. Mechanistic understanding of synthetic cannabinoid toxicity and fatality can help inform overdose treatment strategies and identify vulnerable populations of synthetic cannabinoid users., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Non-small cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangements can be targeted effectively with ALK inhibitors such as crizotinib. However, cancer progression typically occurs within a year as drug resistance develops. One strategy to overcome this drug resistance is to determine if novel cytotoxic agents retain the ability to kill lung cancer cells that have developed ALK inhibitor resistance. We therefore examined curcumin, a drug with anticancer properties, and 2 s-generation curcumin derivatives (1-methyl-3,5-bis[(E)-4-pyridyl) methylidene]-4-piperidone (RL66) and 1-isopropyl-3,5-bis[(pyridine-3-yl) methylene]piperidin-4-one (RL118)) in lung cancer cell lines. The cytotoxicity of curcumin, RL66, and RL118 were tested in both ALK + lung cancer cells (H3122), crizotinib resistant ALK + cells (CR-H3122) and ALK - lung cancer cells (A549), both alone and in combination with crizotinib. ALK + cells were 2-3x more sensitive to RL66 and RL118 than ALK - cells, with the drugs' eliciting IC 50 values in the range of 0.7-1 μM in H3122 cells. Retained cytotoxic potency of the curcumin derivatives in crizotinib resistant cells indicated that mechanisms of resistance to the two drug types are independent, with resistance to ALK inhibitors not necessarily causing cross-resistance to curcumin derivatives. This was further corroborated by drug combination analysis where the effect of the drugs in combination was consistent with Bliss additivity, consistent with independent targets for crizotinib and curcumin derivatives. Results from Western blotting showed that RL118 (2 μM) inhibited p-ALK/ALK by ~50%, which was not as potent as the 90% inhibition elicited by crizotinib (0.25 μM). Since this is the primary mechanism of crizotinib cytotoxicity this provides further evidence of independent mechanisms of toxicity., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Our group investigated combining the phytochemical curcumin and gemcitabine in a liposome, to improve gemcitabine's activity against pancreatic tumours. While optimising the curcumin: gemcitabine ratio for co-encapsulation, we found that increasing curcumin concentrations relative to gemcitabine resulted in antagonistic interactions. As curcumin is a promiscuous transporter inhibitor; we suspected that increased resistance occurred via inhibition of Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1)-mediated gemcitabine uptake. To test our hypothesis, we determined whether curcumin and a related analogue, 2,6-bis((3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)methylene)-cyclohexanone (or A13), inhibited ENT1-mediated accumulation of [ 3 H]uridine and [ 3 H]gemcitabine into pancreatic cancer cells. We then confirmed the inhibition of gemcitabine accumulation by investigating whether curcumin/A13 could increase gemcitabine resistance in growth inhibition assays. We found that curcumin and A13 concentration-dependently inhibited the ENT1-mediated accumulation of both uridine and gemcitabine in MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells. We also found that non-toxic concentrations of curcumin and A13 significantly increased the resistance of both cell lines to gemcitabine. Increased resistance only occurred when curcumin/A13 was co-incubated with gemcitabine, and not with sequential exposure (i.e., curcumin first, followed by gemcitabine, or vice versa). We also found that the curcumin analogue (3E,5E)-3,5-bis[(2-fluorophenyl)methylene]-4-piperidinone (or EF24) did not inhibit gemcitabine accumulation, making it more suitable in combinations than curcumin/A13. From these results, we concluded that curcumin and A13 are inhibitors of the ENT1 transporter, but only at high concentrations (2-20µM). Curcumin is unlikely to inhibit gemcitabine uptake in tumours but may interfere with the oral absorption of ENT1 substrates due to high gut concentrations readily achievable from over-the-counter tablets/capsules., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)