Search

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical outcome and the survival rate of total knee arthroplasty between CT- and MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation 5 years after initial surgery. Methods: At a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (SD 0.3), 98 patients (64% women, loss to follow-up 28%) were included in this analysis. To assess the differences in clinical outcome, patients fulfilled PROMs preoperatively and at each follow-up moment. At final follow-up, the Forgotten Joint Score was adjusted. Results: At final follow-up, no new patients underwent revision surgery in both groups. Regarding the clinical outcome, no statistically significant difference between the groups was found. The Forgotten Joint Score was only performed at final follow-up and showed no significant difference between both groups. Conclusion: At mid-term follow-up, survival rates between CT- and MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation did not show a significant difference. Regarding clinical outcome, only the EQ-5D-VAS (p < 0.040) showed a statistically significant difference over time, in favor of the MRI-group. Level of evidence: Level I. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Management of bone loss around the ankle is a challenging condition. This retrospective study describes the design process, the surgical technique, and the preliminary results of custom-made total ankle arthroplasties (TAA) with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for different severe bone loss conditions. Methods: Consecutive patients that underwent custom-made TAA for severe bone loss conditions were included. The primary outcome was to describe the implant design in relation to the bone defect. Moreover, pre-operative and final follow-up clinical scores were compared. Results: Seven patients were included. Post-operative radiographs showed good correspondence between the pre-operative planning and the prosthesis alignment in all patients. Improvement in clinical scores was observed in all patients at the final follow-up. One patient developed a deep infection. Conclusion: Short-term results reported herein are encouraging suggesting that custom-made TAA implants with PSI may represent an effective solution for ankle bone loss conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) allows for transfer of the preoperative plan onto bony landmarks, the soft tissue balancing is not affected. The goals of this randomized clinical trial were to compare PSI and the measured resection technique (conventional) with PSI and the gap balancing technique. Fifty patients were randomized to TKA with conventional PSI (PSI-S) ( n = 25) or to PSI with additional gap balancing (PSI-GB) ( n = 25). All patients were clinically examined at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Data on the range of motion, the Knee Society Score, the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the High-Flexion Knee Score (HFKS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were compiled at follow-up. Statistically significant improvements were found for all clinical parameters in the PSI-GB group compared to the PSI-S group at 3 months postoperatively and for FS, FJS, and HFKS at 12 months. However, the relevance of these differences, as well as their effect on long-term outcomes, needs to be evaluated further. In conclusion, patient-specific instrumentation combined with gap balancing yielded good early clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Accurate component alignment in total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the important factors in determining long-term survivorship. This has been achieved by conventional jigs, computer-assisted technology (CAS) and more recently patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). The purpose of the current study was to investigate the in vivo accuracy of Trumatch™ PSI using validated pin-less computer navigation system. Method: Twenty consecutive selected patients that fulfilled our inclusion/exclusion criteria underwent TKR using PSI. Coronal alignment, posterior slope, resection thickness and femoral sagittal alignment were recorded using pin-less navigation. The position of the actual cutting block was appropriately adjusted prior to proceeding to definitive resections. Results: The coronal alignment using PSI without the assistance of navigation would have resulted in 14 (70 %) within ±3°, 11 (55 %) within ±2° and 6 (30 %) outside acceptable alignment. Thirty-five percentage of proposed femur sagittal alignment and 55 % of posterior tibial slope were achieved within ±3°. Components size was accurately predicted in 95 % of femurs and 90 % of tibia. Conclusion: The purported advantages in restoring alignments using Trumatch™ PSI alone over standard equipment are debatable. However, it predicts sizing well, and femoral coronal alignment is reasonable. Combining Trumatch™ PSI with CAS will allow in vivo verification and necessary corrections. Level of evidence: IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Commonly used total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems utilising measured resection techniques default to 5°-7° valgus for the distal cut relative to the anatomical axis and 3° external rotation of the femoral component relative to posterior condylar axis (PCA). Rotational errors of the femoral component are associated with pain, patella maltracking and a poorer outcome. We analysed MRI scans from patients undergoing TKA using patient-specific instrumentation to assess coronal and rotational alignment from landmarks identified on the scans. One hundred and eight scans in 59 males and 49 females were studied with age range 35-93 years (mean 67.9 years). We found 91 % of patients had a femoral valgus angle between 5° and 7° (mean angles 5.9°), while only 24 % had an external rotation angle between 2.5° and 3.5° relative to PCA. There was no statistical significance in rotation between males and females although outliers tended to be female. Mean Whiteside's angle was 92.9° (87.8-98). This study highlights the variations in external rotation between patients undergoing TKA using the PCA as a reference for rotation. This may be a contributing factor in implant malalignment and patient dissatisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]