Search

Purpose To synthesise existing qualitative evidence regarding the experiences of people living with cancer and their family caregivers using eHealth technology in their home setting. Method A narrative review using a systematic approach was utilised. Five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library) were searched using a tailored search strategy to identify primary research articles published between January 2005 and May 2021. Studies were quality appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme's Qualitative Studies Checklist and the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool, where relevant. Identified studies were appraised by three reviewers and data were extracted for analysis. Key themes were identified and agreed upon by the authors. Results 28 empirical studies were included in the review. Five major themes emerged: (i) understanding of cancer and its care (ii) alignment and integration of eHealth technology into daily life (iii) connection and collaboration with healthcare professionals, family and peers (iii) reassurance and sense of safety (iv) and the psychosocial impact on the self during the cancer experience. Conclusions eHealth technology can have positive role in the lives of people with cancer and their family caregivers, beyond the intended health outcomes of the intervention. Individual preferences amongst people with cancer and their family caregivers using eHealth technology must be considered, especially regarding cancer information delivery, content and support methods. This review underlines a critical need for further in-depth evidence on the personal meaning and relationships people with cancer and their family caregivers develop with eHealth technology in an ambulatory care setting.

Purpose The purpose of the eSMART (Electronic Symptom Management using the Advanced Symptom Management System (ASyMS) Remote Technology) study is to evaluate the use of mobile phone technology to manage chemotherapy-related toxicities (CRTs) in people with breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)) across multiple European sites. One key objective was to review the published and grey literature on assessment and management of CRTs among patients receiving primary chemotherapy for BC, CRC, HL, and NHL to ensure that ASyMS remained evidence-based and reflected current and local practice. Methods Three electronic databases were searched for English papers, with abstracts available from 01/01/2004-05/04/2014. For the grey literature, relevant clinical practice guidelines (CPGs)/evidence-based resources (EBRs) from the main international cancer organisations were reviewed as were symptom management (SM) protocols from the sites. Results After full-text screening, 27 publications were included. The majority (n = 14) addressed fatigue and focused on BC patients. Relevant CPGs/EBRs were found for fatigue (n = 4), nausea/vomiting (n = 5), mucositis (n = 4), peripheral neuropathy (n = 3), diarrhoea (n = 2), constipation (n = 2), febrile neutropenia/infection (n = 7), palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (n = 1), and pain (n = 4). SM protocols were provided by >40% of the clinical sites. Conclusions A need exists for empirical research on SM for PPE, diarrhoea, and constipation. Research is needed on the efficacy of self-care strategies in patients with BC, CRC, HL, and NHL. In general, consistency exists across CPGs/EBRs and local guidelines on the assessment and management of common CRTs.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the reasons for non-use of a national cancer society's cancer information services among people experiencing cancer. Method This study used a qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a total of 17 participants who had not previously utilised the Cancer Society's information services. Data were analysed using Thematic Analysis. Results The key themes to emerge from the date were ‘living in the here and now’ and ‘awareness of the Cancer Society’. For most participants, not utilising cancer information services was a means of coping with the initial diagnosis and the impact of treatment. Those who progressed to being ready to seek information identified the multi-disciplinary team as the primary source of trusted information, with particular mention of cancer nurse specialists. For participants with children, their role as a parent was central in how they managed their diagnosis. The majority of participants lacked awareness of the range of services provided by the Cancer Society. Conclusions Reasons for non-use of cancer information services were identified as: readiness to seek information and a lack of knowledge of the Cancer Societies’ services. Cancer information services need to continue make a concerted effort to enhance visibility and awareness of its services to optimise patient engagement.

Summary This paper discusses oncology nursing students’ views of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The OSCE has been used as a form of assessment in medical education since the 1970s. It has subsequently been used by nursing faculties as one of a number of approaches to assessment of clinical skills. As a form of assessment it has been lauded as being more objective than traditional clinical examinations. The information in this study was collected through annual evaluations since 1998, when the OSCE was first employed to assess the students on a post-graduate oncology nursing programme. The sample comprised 185 students, and the principle areas addressed were students’ perceptions regarding their degree of preparation for the examination, the overall efficacy and relevance of the OSCE in testing clinical skills and their views on stress and anxiety associated with this form of assessment. The results indicate that while students acknowledge the OSCE was stressful, they felt they were well prepared and appreciated the efficacy and relevance of this assessment method.

The oncology nursing development project was implemented to facilitate the teaching of cancer care to nurses at the pre-registration level. Since the project involved the implementation of change, an action research design was employed. As a first step an assessment of the cancer content of pre-registration nurse education programmes in every general and sick children's training hospital in Ireland was undertaken. This demonstrated that those involved in teaching the cancer content of pre-registration nurse education programmes wanted to be updated in various different aspects of cancer care. As a result of these findings, a directory of cancer-related educational resources was developed and distributed to all schools of nursing. In addition, a learning needs assessment was undertaken to determine which aspects of cancer care should be addressed in a ‘Training the Trainers’ programme. This assessment was used as a basis to develop such a programme, which was implemented and subsequently evaluated. The majority of the participants indicated that they found the programme helpful and requested further education in the area of cancer care. The major strength of this project was that it was implemented nationally, which means that potentially all newly registered nurses in Ireland will be better prepared to care for cancer patients.