1. Minimally invasive approach in endometrial cancer with lower uterine segment involvement in stage ≥ II: A retrospective study.
- Author
-
Perri T, Levin G, Helpman L, Eitan R, Vaknin Z, Lavie O, Ben Arie A, Amit A, Levy T, Namazov A, Ben Shachar I, Atlas I, Bruchim I, Kogan L, and Gemer O
- Subjects
- Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Laparotomy, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Endometrial Neoplasms pathology, Endometrial Neoplasms surgery, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Abstract
Objective: To compare oncological outcomes in women with lower uterine segment involvement (LUSI) in endometrial carcinoma (EC) stage ≥ II - staged by a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus laparotomy., Study Design: A retrospective multi-center cohort study. Univariate analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analysis were performed to compare between women staged by MIS and those staged by laparotomy., Results: Over a median follow-up period of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.5-6 years) 212 women were included, 68 (32.1%) were surgically staged by MIS. Stages of disease did not vary between MIS and laparotomy and were 32.1%, 51.9%, and 16.0%, in stages II, III and IV - respectively. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy rate did not differ between groups. Overall recurrence rate was comparable (p = 0.084). Locoregional recurrence rate was higher in the MIS group odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.19-4.20). Overall and progression free survival were similar in both groups (log rank test p = 0.08 and p = 0.912 respectively). In Cox regression model adjusting for age, comorbidities, tumor grade, stage and adjuvant therapy, route of surgery (MIS vs. laparotomy) was not associated with overall survival (p = 0.169)., Conclusions: In women with advanced EC and LUSI, although MIS is associated with locoregional recurrences, survival is comparable to laparotomy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF