1. Performance of self-sampled HPV test in comparison with liquid based cytology.
- Author
-
Igidbashian S, Boveri S, Radice D, Casadio C, Spolti N, Sandri MT, and Sideri M
- Subjects
- Adult, Cytological Techniques, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Papillomavirus Infections complications, Papillomavirus Infections diagnosis, Self Care, Sensitivity and Specificity, Specimen Handling, Vaginal Smears, Young Adult, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Papillomaviridae isolation & purification, Papillomavirus Infections virology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms virology, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia pathology, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia virology
- Abstract
Objective: Strong evidences shows that HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology in detecting high-grade CIN. HPV test can be performed on samples collected by women themselves by means of self-sampling devices. This study compares the results of self-sampled HPV tests with the results of liquid based cytology (LBC)., Study Design: Seven hundred women scheduled for cervical cytology self-collected a cervicovaginal sample for HPV testing and then underwent a clinician-collected LBC at the European Institute of Oncology. The HPV and LBC results were compared with the McNemar test., Results: All HSIL (N=5) resulted hrHPV positive. LBC resulted LSIL or worse in 38 (5.4%) women (out of 700). Self-sampled HPV was positive in 96 women (13.7%). A LSIL or worse LBC result was found in 15 (2.5%) patients, out of the 604 hrHPV negative women and in 23 (24%) patients, out of the 96 hrHPV positive women. Positive cytology after a self-sampled HPV positive result had an Odds Ratio of 12.4 (95% CI: 5.8-26.6)., Conclusion: Self-collected HPV testing identifies a group of women at high risk of positive LBC and high grade SIL., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF