Search

• Senior trainees still require confidence and training in complex operative birth. • A new practical course significantly increases trainees' confidence levels. • There remains barriers to maintaining skills, especially with Kielland's forceps. To assess the utility of Art & Craft – a new, hands-on course on Advanced Rotational Techniques and safe Caesarean biRth at Advanced/Full dilation Training aimed at senior Obstetrics trainees. The aims were to assess whether it improved confidence and skills in rotational vaginal birth, impacted fetal head at caesarean, and ultrasound for fetal position. With ethical approval, pre- and post- course questionnaires and post- course interviews of attendees were conducted. A pre course questionnaire was emailed 1 week before the course. Attendees were asked to rate their confidence levels in performing vaginal examination and ultrasound assessment of fetal position, rotational ventouse, manual rotation, Kielland's rotational forceps, and disimpaction of the fetal head during second stage caesarean on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 = not confident at all and 5 = very confident. A post-course questionnaire with the same questions was emailed 3 days after. p values for differences in scores were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test using Stata/MP 18 software. 32 trainees attended the course. 28 questionnaires were available for analysis. The majority 39 % were middle grade (ST3-ST5) level. Initial confidence was very low for rotational forceps (median 1/5). After attending the course and practical stations, respondents' confidence levels increased significantly (p < 0.05) across all domains; vaginal examination from 4 to 5, ultrasound for fetal position, rotational ventouse, and manual rotation from 3 to 5, disimpaction from 4 to 4.5, and Kielland's rotational forceps from 1 to 4. Nine participated in post course interviews, which were thematically analysed. Participants expressed that the course gave them the opportunity to ask specific questions from experts to improve their confidence. A barrier to learning new methods was highlighted in that it is difficult to receive practical training in Kielland's, resulting in low confidence. A practical, hands-on course on complex operative birth significantly increases trainee confidence levels in vaginal examination, ultrasound for fetal position, disimpaction, and techniques for rotational vaginal birth. The evaluation highlights that continued education and practise is required, even when trainees are senior. Evaluation of clinical outcomes after training is needed; and planned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Environmental factors in the operating room during cesarean sections are likely important for both women/birthing people and their babies but there is currently a lack of rigorous literature about their evaluation. The principal aim of this study was to systematically examine studies published on the physical environment in the obstetrical operating room during c-sections and its impact on mother and neonate outcomes. The secondary objective was to identify the sensors used to investigate the operating room environment during cesarean sections. In this literature review, we searched MEDLINE a database using the following keywords: Cesarean section AND (operating room environment OR Noise OR Music OR Video recording OR Light level OR Gentle OR Temperature OR Motion Data). Eligible studies had to be published in English or French within the past 10 years and had to investigate the operating room environment during cesarean sections in women. For each study we reported which aspects of the physical environment were investigated in the OR (i.e., noise, music, movement, light or temperature) and the involved sensors. Of a total of 105 studies screened, we selected 8 articles from title and abstract in PubMed. This small number shows that the field is poorly investigated. The most evaluated environment factors to date are operating room noise and temperature, and the presence of music. Few studies used advanced sensors in the operating room to evaluate environmental factors in a more nuanced and complete way. Two studies concern the sound level, four concern music, one concerns temperature and one analyzed the number of entrances/exits into the OR. No study analyzed light level or more fine-grained movement data. Main findings include increase of noise and motion at specific time-points, for example during delivery or anaesthesia; the positive impact of music on parents and staff alike; and that a warmer theatre is better for babies but more uncomfortable for surgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the economic impact of the introduction of carbetocin for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) at caesarean section, compared to oxytocin.Study Design: The model is a decision tree conducted from a UK National Health Service perspective. 1500 caesarean sections (both elective and emergency) were modelled over a 12 month period. Efficacy data was taken from a published Cochrane meta-analysis, and costs from NHS Reference costs, the British National Formulary and the NHS electronic Medicines Information Tool. A combination of hospital audit data and expert input from an advisory board of clinicians was used to inform resource use estimates. The main outcome measures were the incidence of PPH and total cost over a one year time horizon, as a result of using carbetocin compared to oxytocin for prevention of PPH at caesarean section.Results: The use of carbetocin compared to oxytocin for prevention of PPH at caesarean section was associated with a reduction of 30 (88 vs 58) PPH events (>500ml blood loss), and a cost saving of £27,518. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, carbetocin had a 91.5% probability of producing better outcomes, and a 69.4% chance of being dominant (both cheaper and more effective) compared to oxytocin.Conclusion: At list price, the introduction of carbetocin appears to provide improved clinical outcomes along with cost savings, though this is subject to uncertainty regarding the underlying data in efficacy, resource use, and cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the impact of type of bariatric surgery on pregnancy outcomes.Study Design: This is a national prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). Data collection was undertaken in 200 consultant-led NHS maternity units between November 2011 and October 2012 (gastric banding), and April 2014 and March 2016 (gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy). Participants were pregnant women following gastric banding (n = 127), gastric bypass (n = 134) and sleeve gastrectomy (n = 29). Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared using generalised linear and linear mixed models. Maternal outcomes included gestational weight gain, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, anaemia, surgical complications. Perinatal outcomes included birthweight, small/large for gestational age (SGA/LGA), preterm birth, stillbirth.Results: Maternal: Women pregnant after gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy had a lower risk of anaemia compared with gastric bypass (banding (16 %) vs bypass (39 %): p = 0.002, sleeve (21 %) vs bypass: p = 0.04). Gestational diabetes risk was lower after gastric banding compared with gastric bypass (7 % vs 16 %, p = 0.03) despite women with banding having significantly greater weight at booking as well as gestational weight gain. Women pregnant after gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy had a lower risk of surgical complications than after gastric bypass (banding (0.9 %) vs bypass (11.4 %): p = 0.03, sleeve (0.0 %) vs bypass: p = 0.06). Perinatal: Infants born to mothers after gastric banding had a higher birthweight than those born to mothers after gastric bypass (mean difference = 260 g (125-395), p < 0.001). Infants were more likely to be LGA if their mothers had gastric banding compared with gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy (banding (21 %) vs bypass (5 %): p = 0.006; banding vs sleeve (3 %): p = 0.03). Risk of preterm birth was higher in women with gastric banding compared with gastric bypass (13 % vs 8 %, p = 0.04).Conclusions: Women planning bariatric surgery should be counselled regarding the differing impacts of different types of procedure on any future pregnancy. Pre-existing gastric bypass is associated with higher rates of potentially serious surgical complications during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Rotational forceps and manual rotation followed by direct forceps are techniques used in the management of malposition of the fetal head in the second stage of labor. However, there is widespread debate regarding their relative safety and utility. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of rotational forceps with manual rotation followed by direct forceps, for management of fetal malposition at full dilation.Study Design: A retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary obstetric unit with >6000 births per year. We recorded and analysed outcomes of 104 sequential rotational forceps births over 21 months (Jan 2010-Sept 2012) and 208 matched chronologically sequential attempted manual rotations and direct forceps births (1:2 by number). Univariable and multivariable approaches used for statistical analysis. The main outcome measure was vaginal birth.Results: The rate of vaginal birth was significantly higher with rotational forceps than with manual rotation followed by direct forceps (88.5% vs 82.2%, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.31, p=0.017). Births by rotational forceps were associated with a significantly higher rate of shoulder dystocia (19.2% vs 10.6%, RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.23-4.47, p=0.012), but not of neonatal injury. There were no significant differences in all other maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two modes of birth.Conclusions: The use of rotational forceps was associated with a statistically significantly higher rate of vaginal birth, but also of shoulder dystocia, compared to manual rotation followed by direct forceps. This is the first study to demonstrate a statistically significant increase in the rate of shoulder dystocia following rotational forceps birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]