Search

Background and purpose: The Movement Disorder Society sponsored version of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is a comprehensive instrument for assessing Parkinson’s disease (PD). The present study was aimed at determining the relationships between MDS-UPDRS components and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluations in PD patients. Methods: An international, multicenter, cross-sectional study was carried out of 435 PD patients assessed with the MDS-UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Clinical Impression Severity for PD, EQ-5D and PD Questionnaire eight items (PDQ-8). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, exploratory factor analysis and multiple linear regression models (dependent variables EQ-5D and PDQ-8) were performed. Results: The participants’ age was 66.71 10.32 years (51.5% men). PD duration was 8.52 6.14, and median HY was 2 (range 1–5). The correlation between the EQ-5D index and the MDS-UPDRS ranged from 0.46 (Part IV) to 0.72 (Part II) and for the PDQ-8 index from 0.47 (Part III) to 0.74 (Part II). In multiple regression models with the MDS-UPDRS domains as independent variables, the main determinant for both the EQ-5D index and the PDQ-8 was Part II followed by Part I. After factorial grouping of the cardinal PD manifestations embedded in the MDS-UPDRS Parts III and IV for inclusion into multiple regression models, a factor formed by M-EDL, nM-EDL and fluctuations was the main determinant for both the EQ-5D and PDQ-8 indexes. Conclusions: The MDS-UPDRS component most tightly related with the HRQoL measures was a combination of motor and non-motor experiences of daily living.

Background and purpose Although Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by typical motor manifestations, non-motor symptoms (NMS) are an outstanding part of the disease. At present, several specific instruments for assessment of NMS are available. The objective of our study was to determine the performance of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Part I – Non-Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (nM-EDL) compared with the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS). Methods To this purpose, 434 consecutive patients with PD were included in an international, observational, cross-sectional study. The association between scores of both scales was determined by the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Equations for transformation of total score of a scale to the other were constructed from weighted regression models and both, transformed and observed score, contrasted by means of the Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (LCCC) and Bland–Altman plot. Results As a whole, the prevalence of the NMS according to each scale was quite similar, and most of the correlations between their corresponding components were high (rS > 0.60). The total score correlation of the MDS-UPDRS Part I with the NMSS was high (rS = 0.81). Concerning the transformed scores, estimated scores only partially approach the observed ones (sharing about 60–64% of the variance) because residual variance increased with increasing magnitudes of the scores, i.e. the most severe patients (Bland–Altman plot; LCCC

The objective of this research was to evaluate the validity of Hodkinson's Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) in screening for dementia and to identify the optimum cut-off point to use in a prevalence survey. The study included two groups of persons: (i) a random sample of 183 individuals selected from census data, 96 of whom completed the study and (ii) another 36 persons with dementia were selected from a hospital outpatients department by sampling consecutive cases. The DSM-IV criteria were used as the "gold standard" to establish a diagnosis of dementia. The AMT was administered to the 132 participants who subsequently underwent independent clinical evaluation. In the community sample, 11 persons were diagnosed with dementia and 85 without. In the total sample, a score of 7 maximizes the efficacy of the test. The sensitivity for this cut-off point is 91.5% (78.7-97.2%) and the specificity is 82.4% (72.2-89.5%). A score of 9 gives 100% sensitivity, but the proportion of false positives rises to 66%. Our results are consistent with other studies and suggest that the AMT is a valid instrument for use in screening for dementia in populations similar to the one in this study.