Search

Human herpesvirus-6A (HHV-6A) betachemokine-receptor U51A binds inflammatory modulators CCL2, CCL5, CCL11, CCL7, and CCL13. This unique specificity overlaps that of human chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, and CCR5. In model cell lines, expression leads to CCL5 down-regulation with both constitutive and inducible signaling. Here, immunomodulation pathways are investigated in human leukocytes permissive for infection. Constitutive signaling was shown using inositol phosphate assays and inducible calcium signaling by response to CCL2, CCL5 and CCL11. Constitutive signaling targets were examined using an immune response-related microarray and RT-PCR, showing down-regulation of CCL5 and FOG-2, a hematopoietic transcriptional repressor. By RT-PCR and siRNA reversion, CCL5 and FOG-2 were shown down-regulated, during peak U51A expression post infection. Two further active ligands, XCL1 and CCL19, were identified, making U51A competitor to their human receptors, XCR1 and CCR7, on T lymphocytes, NK and dendritic cells. Finally, U51A-expressing cell lines and infected ex vivo leukocytes, showed migration towards chemokine-gradients, and chemokine internalization. Consequently, U51A may affect virus dissemination or host transmission by chemotaxis of infected cells to sites of chemokine secretion specific for U51A (for example the lymph node or lung, by CCL19 or CCL11, respectively) and evade immune-effector cells by chemokine diversion and down-regulation, affecting virus spread and inflammatory pathology.

Chemokines regulate the chemotaxis, development, and differentiation of many cell types enabling the regulation of routine immunosurveillance and immunological adaptation. CC chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) is the target of 11 chemokines. This promiscuity of receptor-ligand interactions and the potential for functional redundancy has led us to investigate the selective activation of CCR1-coupled pathways by known CCR1 agonists. Chemokines leukotactin-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, monocyte chemotactic peptide (MCP)-3, RANTES, and MIP-1delta all inhibited adenylyl cyclase activity in cells transiently transfected with CCR1. In contrast, only MIP-1delta was unable to signal via G14-, G16- or chimeric 16z44-coupled pathways. In a stable cell line expressing CCR1 and Galpha14, all of these five chemokines along with hemofiltrate CC chemokine (HCC)-1 and myeloid progenitor inhibitory factor (MPIF)-1 were able to stimulate G(i/o)-coupled pathways, but MIP-1delta, HCC-1 and MPIF-1 were unable to activate G14-mediated stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta activity. In addition, MIP-1delta was unable to promote the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and c-Jun N-terminal kinase. This suggests that different chemokines are able to selectively activate CCR1-coupled pathways, probably because of different intrinsic ligand efficacies. CCR1 and Galpha14 or Galpha16 are co-expressed in several cell types and we hypothesize that selective activation of chemokine receptors provides a mechanism by which chemokines are able to fine-tune intracellular signaling pathways.

Chemokines play critical roles in governing the recruitment and activation of eosinophils at sites of allergic inflammation, particularly the asthmatic lung. However, we know little of how chemokine function is regulated post-translationally. Proteoglycans, consisting of a core protein and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains, are cell surface molecules and components of the extracellular matrix that are able to bind chemokines, whilst heparin is a GAG with therapeutic value in asthma. We examined whether soluble GAG could alter the actions of chemokines in assays of eosinophil activation. Heparin inhibited intracellular calcium flux, respiratory burst and chemotactic responses of eosinophils to CCL11, but not to the chemoattractant C5a, and inhibited binding of CCL11 to CCR3. Heparin also inhibited eosinophil stimulation by CCL11, CCL24, CCL7, CCL13 and CCL5 to differing degrees, which broadly correlated with their relative affinities for heparin. Heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate, but not chondroitin sulfate, also inhibited the actions of CCL11 and CCL13 in assays of cellular shape change and chemotaxis. Following treatment with the sulfation inhibitor chlorate or proteoglycanases, no inhibition of CCL11-induced activity was observed using either eosinophils or a CCR3-expressing transfectant cell line. This suggests that cell surface proteoglycans are not necessary for signaling via CCR3. However, the GAG context in which chemokines are expressed is likely to represent an important level of regulation of allergic inflammation.

To reach the site of antigen deposition at epithelial surfaces, dendritic cells (DC) have to traverse the endothelial barrier, progress through the tissue (i.e., dermis) and cross the dermo-epithelial junction (basal membrane). In the present study, we demonstrate that (1) circulating blood DC and monocytes express high levels of CCR2 and primarily respond to monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP) and not to macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3alpha/CCL20; (2) while the CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC)-derived CD1a(+) precursors committed to Langerhans cell differentiation primarily respond to MIP-3alpha/CCL20, the HPC-derived CD14(+) precursors respond to both MCP and MIP-3alpha/CCL20; (3) in concordance with the sequential expression of CCR2 and CCR6, the HPC-derived CD14(+) precursors initially acquire the ability to migrate in response to MCP-4/CCL13 and subsequently in response to MIP-3alpha/CCL20; and (4) in vivo, in inflamed epithelium, MCP-4/CCL13 and MIP-3alpha/CCL20 form complementary gradients, with MCP-4/CCL13 expressed in basal epithelial cells at the contact of blood vessels, while MIP-3alpha/CCL20 expression is restricted to epithelial cells bordering the external milieu. These observations suggest that the recruitment of DC to the site of infection is controlled by the sequential action of different chemokines: (i) CCR2(+) circulating DC or DC precursors are mobilized into the tissue via the expression of MCP by cells lining blood vessels, and (ii) these cells traffic from the tissue to the site of pathogen invasion via the production of MIP-3alpha/CL20 by epithelial cells and the up-regulation of CCR6 in response to the tissue environment.

ELC and SLC are potent agonists for CCR7, a receptor of up-most importance for the regulation of the homing and traffic of lymphocytes into and within secondary lymphoid tissues. We have studied the effects of both chemokines on receptor re-distribution in T lymphocytes and other CCR7-bearing cells by flow cytometry and by assessing receptor mediated functions. In this paper we show that ELC and SLC differ fundamentally in the ability to induce the internalization of their receptor. ELC induced a rapid time- and concentration-dependent internalization of CCR7 and markedly decreased the ability of CCR7-bearing cells to respond to a second stimulation. No receptor internalization, by contrast, was observed on stimulation with SLC. Receptors that were internalized on stimulation with ELC were re-expressed when the cells were washed. Re-expression of receptors and consequent re-activation of the cells was prevented in the presence of ELC, but was not affected in the presence of SLC. These findings could explain how T lymphocytes that enter lymphoid tissues in response to SLC produced by high-endothelial venules can subsequently migrate in response to SLC and ELC expressed within the T cell areas.

Recent work identified the murine gene homologous to the human T cell attracting chemokine CXC receptor ligand 11 (CXCL11, also termed I-TAC, SCYB11, ss-R1, H174, IP-9). Here, the biological activity and expression patterns of murine CXCL11 relative to CXCL9 (MIG) and CXCL10 (IP-10/crg-2), the other two CXCR3 ligands, were assessed. Calcium mobilization and chemotaxis experiments demonstrated that murine CXCL11 stimulated murine CXCR3 at much lower doses than murine CXCL9 or murine CXCL10. Murine CXCL11 also evoked calcium mobilization in CHO cells transfected with human CXCR3 and was chemotactic for CXCR3-expressing human T lymphocytes as well as for 300--19 pre-B cells transfected with human or murine CXCR3. Moreover, murine CXCL11 blocked the chemotactic effect of human CXCL11 on human CXCR3 transfectants. Depending on cell type (macrophage-like cells RAW264.7, J774A.1, fetal F20 and adult dermal fibroblasts, immature and mature bone marrow-derived dendritic cells) and stimulus (interferons, LPS, IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha), an up to 10,000-fold increase of CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 mRNA levels, quantified by real-time PCR, was observed. In vivo, the three chemokines are constitutively expressed in various tissues from healthy BALB/c mice and were strongly up-regulated during rejection of allogeneic heart transplants. Chemokine mRNA levels exceeded those of CXCR3 and IFN-gamma which were induced with similar kinetics by several orders of magnitude.

The viral CC chemokine macrophage inhibitory protein-II (vMIP-II) encoded by human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8) binds to multiple chemokine receptors, however, its ability to control the initial recruitment of specific leukocyte subtypes from the peripheral circulation has not been fully clarified. Here we show that vMIP-II blocks the firm arrest and transmigration of monocytes or Th1-like T lymphocytes triggered by RANTES immobilized on activated human microvascular endothelium (HMVEC) under flow conditions. The internalization of the receptors CCR1 and CCR5 that mediate arrest and transmigration of these cells in response to RANTES was prevented by vMIP-II, supporting its role as an antagonist of CCR1 and CCR5. In contrast, vMIP-II triggered the firm arrest of eosinophils and Th2-like T cells by engaging CCR3, as confirmed by its down-regulation. Immunohistochemical analysis of HHV-8-associated Kaposi's sarcoma lesions marked by vMIP-II expression and mononuclear cell infiltration revealed a predominance of Th2-type CCR3(+) lymphocytes over Th1-type CXCR3(+)/CCR5(+) leukocytes, indicating that as a CCR3 agonist vMIP-II can drive a Th2-type immune response in vivo. Thus, our data provide evidence for a immunomodulatory role of vMIP-II in directing inflammatory cell recruitment away from a Th1-type towards a Th2-type response and thereby facilitating evasion from cytotoxic reactions.

The viral chemokine antagonist vMIP-II encoded by human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8) and MC148 encoded by the poxvirus - Molluscum contagiosum - were tested against the newly identified chemokine receptor CCR10. As the CCR10 ligand ESkine / CCL27 had the highest identity to MC148 and because both chemokines are expressed in the skin we suspected MC148 to block CCR10. However, in calcium mobilization assays we found MC148 unable to block CCR10 in micromolar concentrations in contrast to vMIP-II. (125)I-MC148 was only able to bind to CCR8, but not to CCR10, CCR11, CXCR6 / BONZO, APJ, DARC or the orphan receptors BOB, EBI-II, GPR4, GPR17, HCR or RDC1. We conclude that MC148 is a highly selective CCR8 antagonist conceivably optimized to interfere with NK cell and monocyte invasion, whereas the broad-spectrum antagonist vMIP-II protects HHV8 by blocking multiple receptors.

When naive T lymphocytes are activated and differentiate into memory/effector cells, they down-regulate receptors for constitutive chemokines such as CXCR4 and CCR7 and acquire receptors for inflammatory chemokines such as CCR3, CCR5 and CXCR3, depending on the Th1/Th2 polarization. This switch in chemokine receptor usage leads to the acquisition of the capacity to migrate into inflamed tissues. Using RNase protection assays, staining with specific antibodies, and response to recombinant chemokines, we now show that following TCR stimulation, memory/effector T cells undergo a further and transient switch in receptor expression. CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR5, CCR6 and CXCR3 are down-regulated within 6 h, while CCR7, CCR4, CCR8 and CXCR5 are up-regulated for 2 to 3 days. Up-regulation of CCR7 following TCR stimulation was observed also among resting peripheral blood T cells and required neither co-stimulation nor exogenous IL-2. On the other hand IL-2 down-regulated CXCR5, up-regulated CCR8 and facilitated the recovery of CCR3 and CCR5. Upon TCR stimulation, Th1 and Th2 cells produced comparable sets of chemokines, including RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta, I-309, IL-8 and macrophage-derived chemokine, which may modulate surface chemokine receptors and contribute to cell recruitment at sites of antigenic recognition. Altogether these results show that following TCR stimulation effector/memory T cells transiently acquire responsiveness to constitutive chemokines. As a result, T cells that are activated in tissues may either recirculate to draining lymph nodes or migrate to nearby sites of organized ectopic lymphoid tissues.

Basophils stimulated with IL-3 plus C5a selectively express IL-4 and IL-13 and continuously produce leukotrienes (LT) for hours. C5a combined with IL-5 or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulated factor was, however, much less effective in promoting cytokine expression and a late continuous phase of LTC4 production, possibly due to lower expression levels of their receptor alpha chains. Basophils also express several chemoattractant receptors, including high levels of C5a receptors, macrophage chemotactic protein (MCP) receptors (CCR2) and eotaxin receptors (CCR3), intermediate levels of CXCR1, CXCR2 and platelet-activating factor receptors, and lower levels of N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP) receptors. However, among the corresponding agonists, only C5a, fMLP and much more weakly MCP1, were found to induce cytokine expression and continuous LTC4 release, and only when combined with IL-3. CCR3, which is highly expressed on basophils and has been shown to mediate strong migratory but weak release responses, does not regulate cytokine expression. The weakly expressed fMLP receptor is an efficient activator of several cell functions including LTC4 formation, while CXCR2 hardly affects basophil function despite considerable expression. Thus, chemoattractant-receptors mediate different cellular responses unrelated to their expression levels.

The ras-related small GTPases of the rho family coordinate the assembly of complex cytoskeletal structures crucial for cell motility and polarization. Cdc42 controls filopodia formation in some cell types; however, other physiological functions, agonists and subsequent signaling cascades remain to be elucidated. Expression of cdc42 mutants in monocytic cells showed that CC chemokines regulate the rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton via cdc42, i.e. formation of filopodia-like projections was induced by CC chemokines or dominant active cdc42, while dominant inactive cdc42 prevented its stimulation with CC chemokines. Both cdc42 mutants inhibited CC chemokine-induced monocyte migration across bare filters or across filters coated with endothelium, implicating cdc42 activity and its effector functions in chemotaxis. In contrast, cdc42 mutants did not affect the rho-dependent activation integrin avidity by CC chemokines. The chemokine-induced signaling pathways involved phosphoinositide 3-kinase upstream of cdc42, as shown by inhibition of cytoskeletal reorganization with wortmannin. These data identify CC chemokines as physiological agonists of cdc42 and reveal its functional importance in chemotaxis and extravasation of monocytes.

Two subpopulations of human T lymphocytes expressing different antigen receptors, alpha/beta and gamma/delta, emigrate into inflamed tissues in distinctive patterns. We compared the transmigration of alpha/beta and gamma/delta T cells to C-C and C-X-C chemokines using an in vitro transendothelial chemotaxis assay. The C-C chemokines monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha and MIP-1beta stimulated similar, dose-dependent chemotaxis of purified gamma/delta T cells, whereas MCP-1, RANTES, and MIP-1alpha produced greater chemotaxis of purified alpha/beta T cells than MIP-1beta. In contrast, the C-X-C chemokines interleukin (IL)-8 and interferon-gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10) did not promote chemotaxis of either alpha/beta or gamma/delta T cells. Three gamma/delta T cell clones with differing CD4 and CD8 phenotypes also migrated exclusively to C-C chemokines. Phenotypic analysis of mononuclear cells that transmigrated from an input population of unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells confirmed the results with purified gamma/delta T cells. Our data demonstrate that human peripheral blood alpha/beta and gamma/delta T cells can transmigrate to MCP-1, RANTES, MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta, and suggest that both T lymphocyte subpopulations share the capacity to emigrate in response to C-C chemokines during inflammation.

Interleukin-8 (IL-8) acts on human neutrophils via two receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2. It shares CXCR2 with all neutrophil-activating chemokines, which like IL-8 have a conserved Glu-Leu-Arg (ELR) N-terminal motif, but is generally considered to be the only relevant agonist for CXCR1. IL-8 has a basic residue at the sixth position after the second cysteine, which was suggested to contribute to CXCR1 specificity. Among the other ELR chemokines, only granulocyte chemotactic protein 2 (GCP-2) has such a basic determinant. Using Jurkat cells that stably express either CXCR1 or CXCR2, we studied receptor activation by IL-8, GCP-2 epithelial neutrophil-activating protein 2 (ENA-78) (which shares 77% identical amino acids with GCP-2) and growth-regulated oncogene alpha (GRO alpha). At 10 nM and higher concentrations, GCP-2 and IL-8 induced significant activation of CXCR1-expressing cells, but no activity was found with GRO alpha and ENA-78. As expected, however, all four chemokines had similar activities on CXCR2-expressing cells. A variant of GCP-2 in which the basic residue, Arg20, was replaced by a glycine was synthesized. This derivative was ineffective on CXCR1, but was as active as wild-type GCP-2 in CXCR2-expressing cells. GCP-2 displaced radiolabeled IL-8 from both receptors with low affinity, and in this respect resembled ENA-78 and GRO alpha. Our data show that GCP-2 acts via both IL-8 receptors and thus appears to be functionally more similar to IL-8 than to the other ELR chemokines. Activation of CXCR1 appears to depend significantly on the presence of a basic binding determinant close to the second cysteine.

In viral meningitis the inflammatory response involves activated T cells and monocytes which are recruited into the subarachnoid space. To identify the chemotactic signals attracting the cells to the site of infection in the meninges, we measured the levels of two CXC chemokines, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) inducible protein (IP)-10 and monokine induced by IFN-gamma, four CC chemokines, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 alpha and MIP-1 beta, as well as the cytokines interleukin (IL)-15 and IL-16 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients suffering from viral meningitis. The results point to an involvement of two chemokines, MCP-1 and IP-10, since (1) unlike the other cytokines, MCP-1 and IP-10 were present in 97% and 79% of the CSF, respectively, at concentrations sufficient to induce chemotaxis of mononuclear cells; (2) more than 90% of the CSF of viral meningitis induced chemotaxis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and all of them induced chemotaxis of activated T cells, and (3) the CSF-mediated chemotaxis of PBMC was inhibited by anti-MCP-1 antibodies and chemotaxis of activated T cells was abolished by the combination of anti-MCP-1 and anti-IP-10 antibodies. Our data provide evidence that MCP-1 and IP-10 lead to accumulation of activated T cells and monocytes in the CSF compartment in viral meningitis.

Several recent studies have identified eosinophils as a cellular source of various cytokines, indicating that eosinophils play not only an effector role, but also a regulatory role within the allergic inflammatory cell network. In this study, we demonstrate that eosinophils can generate and secrete monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a prototype of C-C chemokines. Eosinophils generated immunoreactive MCP-1 in response to such diverse stimuli as C5a, formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (FMLP) and ionomycin, but MCP-1 production was not induced by interleukin (IL)-1 or tumor necrosis factor-alpha. C5a- and FMLP-induced eosinophil MCP-1 production was absolutely dependent on pretreatment with cytochalasin B. Eosinophils elaborated significantly more MCP-1 than neutrophils. Immunoreactive MCP-1 was detected at 6 h of incubation with C5a or FMLP. Expression of MCP-1 mRNA reached a maximum within the first 3 h after stimulation and then declined rapidly to a very low and stable level by 18 h. Pretreatment with IL-5 markedly amplified C5a-induced MCP-1 production, and the enhancement occurred at the pretranslational level. Eosinophil-active chemokines such as eotaxin failed to induce MCP-1 generation, even when eosinophils were primed by IL-5. Since MCP-1 exerts a potent histamine-releasing effect on human basophils, our results indicate that eosinophils may regulate basophil mediator release with possible consequent contribution to the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation via a paracrine mechanism.

The mechanism leading to selective production and accumulation of eosinophils in certain allergic skin diseases is unknown. Cyclophosphamide treatment (150 mg/kg) of BALB/c mice 48 h before sensitization with picryl chloride (PCl) resulted in striking blood and tissue eosinophilia, maximal at 13 days. Blood eosinophilia was not induced by the sensitization with oxazolone and 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene. Challenge with 1 % PCl, but not croton oil caused preferential eosinophil accumulation into the dermis, which was associated with the enhanced expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) on endothelial cells. Intravenous administration of anti-VCAM-1 monoclonal antibody abrogated eosinophil infiltration. In this murine model, we examined the role of several cytokines, including chemokines in inducing selective tissue eosinophilia in vivo. Local administration of antibodies against interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-4, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and RANTES, but not against IL-5 before challenge inhibited hapten-induced eosinophil recruitment. Intradermal injection of recombinant (r)IL-1beta, rIL-4, rTNF-alpha, rRANTES, and rMIP-1alpha induced marked eosinophil accumulation. Nonetheless, intradermal rIL-5 was not a chemoattractant for eosinophils in vivo. Our findings suggest that IL-1beta, IL-4, TNF-alpha, and RANTES contribute to the selective accumulation of eosinophils in contact sensitivity reaction. Although circulating IL-5 can activate eosinophils and prolong their survival, locally secreted IL-5 is not crucial for inducing eosinophil recruitment into the skin.

The proteolytic cleavage product of complement component 3, (C3a), is like C4a and C5a, is a potent anaphylatoxin and induces the production of inflammatory mediators in phagocytes. Notably, mast cells respond to C3a with the release of vasoactive substances, including histamine. We have examined the function and receptor binding of C3a in a human leukemic mast cell line, HMC-1. Similar to chemoattractant agonists in leukocytes, C3a induced rapid cytosolic free calcium concentration increases in HMC-1 cells. EGTA did not diminish this response, indicating that mobilizable Ca2+ was from intracellular stores. Receptors of C3a in HMC-1 cells couple in part to Bordetella pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins and, therefore, appear to belong to the family of serpentine receptors that require G-proteins for signal transduction. HMC-1 cells express two types of C3a receptors, C3aR1 and C3aR2, that were shown to bind 125I-C3a with high-(Kd1 = 2.1-4.8 nM) or low-affinity (Kd2 = 30-150 nM), and both receptors are expressed at high level: 3 x 10(5)-6 x 10(5) C3aR1/cell and 5 x 10(5)-2.3 x 10(6) C3aR2/cell. Results from cross-linking experiments with 125I-C3a fully agree with the presence of two different classes of C3a receptors in HMC-1 cells. Two membrane proteins with apparent molecular masses of 54-61 kDa (p57) and 86-107 kDa (p97) could be covalently modified with 125I-C3a, and this cross-linking was inhibited with an excess of unlabeled C3a. Many of the known agonists for leukocytes including 13 chemokines (IL-8, NAP-2, GRO alpha, ENA-78, IP10, PF4, MCP-1, 2 and 3, RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta and I309), three neuropeptides (neuropeptide Y, somatostatin and calcitonin), as well as C5a, did not activate HMC-1 cells, indicating that C3a is one of a few protein ligands for which this cell line expresses specific receptors. The apparent selectivity for C3a and the abundant expression of C3a receptors make the HMC-1 cell line an excellent choice for the cloning of the receptor genes.

We describe here that members of the CC chemokines exhibit biological activities other than chemotaxis. Macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and RANTES, but not interleukin (IL)-8, induce the generation of cytolytic cells, designated here as CHAK (CC chemokine-activated killer) cells to distinguish them from IL-2-activated (LAK) cells. Like IL-2, CC chemokines can induce the proliferation and activation of killer cells. While incubating CC chemokines with CD4+ or CD8+ cells did not generate CHAK activity, all CC chemokines were capable of inducing CHAK activity upon incubating with CD56+ cells, suggesting that the primary effectors are NK cells. However, the presence of other cell types, such as CD4+ or CD8+, are necessary to induce the proliferation of CD56+ cells. Confirming the involvement of T cell-derived factors in inducing the proliferation of these cells, anti-IL-2 and anti-interferon-gamma, but not anti-IL-1 beta, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha, anti-IL-8, or anti-granulocyte/monocyte-colony-stimulating factor inhibited RANTES-induced proliferation of nylon wool column-nonadherent cells. Our results may have important clinical applications for the utilization of CHAK cells in the treatment of cancer and immunodeficient patients.

Eight chemokines were tested for ability to elicit transendothelial chemotaxis of unstimulated peripheral blood T lymphocytes. The C-C chemokines monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-2, MCP-3, RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, and, as previously described, MCP-1 induced significant, dose-dependent transendothelial chemotaxis of CD3+ T lymphocytes. In contrast, the C-X-C chemokines interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interferon-gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10) failed to induce transendothelial chemotaxis of CD3+ T lymphocytes or T lymphocyte subsets. RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta induced significant transendothelial chemotaxis of CD4+, CD8+, and CD45R0+ T lymphocyte subsets. Phenotyping of mononuclear cells that underwent transendothelial migration to MCP-2, MCP-3, RANTES, or MIP-1 alpha showed both monocytes and activated (CD26 high), memory-type (CD45R0+) T cells. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were recruited, but not natural killer cells or significant numbers of B cells. MCP-2 was the only C-C chemokine tested that attracted a significant number of naive-type (CD45RA+) T lymphocytes. In the absence of endothelium, IL-8 but not IP-10 promoted modest but significant chemotoxis of CD3+ T lymphocytes. Our data support the hypothesis that C-C, not the C-X-C chemokines IL-8 or IP-10, promote transendothelial chemotaxis of T lymphocytes.