Search

We explored the clinico-genetic basis of spinocerebellar ataxia 29 (SCA29) by determining the frequency, phenotype, and functional impact of ITPR1 missense variants associated with early-onset ataxia (EOA). Three hundred thirty one patients from a European EOA target cohort (n = 120), US-American EOA validation cohort (n = 72), and early-onset epileptic encephalopathy (EOEE) control cohort (n = 139) were screened for de novo ITPR1 variants. The target cohort was also screened for inherited ITPR1 variants. The variants' functional impact was determined by IP3-induced Ca2+ release in HEK293 cells. 3/120 patients (2.5%) from the target cohort and 4/72 patients (5.5%) from the validation cohort, but none from the EOEE control cohort, carried de novo ITPR1 variants. However, most ITPR1 variants (7/10 = 70%) in the target cohort were inherited from a healthy parent, with 3/6 patients carrying disease-causing variants in other genes. This suggests limited or no phenotypic impact of many ITPR1 missense variants, even if ultra-rare and well-conserved. While common bioinformatics tools did not discriminate de novo from other ITPR1 variants, functional characterization demonstrated reduced IP3-induced Ca2+ release for all de novo variants, including the recurrent c.805C>T (p.(R269W)) variant. In sum, these findings show that de novo ITPR1 missense variants are a recurrent cause of EOA (SCA29) across independent cohorts, acting via loss of IP3 channel function. Inherited ITPR1 variants are also enriched in EOA, but often without strong impact, albeit rare and well-conserved. Functional studies allow identifying ITPR1 variants with large impact, likely disease-causing. Such functional confirmation is warranted for inherited ITPR1 variants before making a SCA29 diagnosis.

Chromosomal band 1q21.1 can be divided into two distinct regions, proximal and distal, based on segmental duplications that mediate recurrent rearrangements. Microdeletions and microduplications of the distal region within 1q21.1, which are susceptibility factors for a variety of neurodevelopmental phenotypes, have been more extensively studied than proximal microdeletions and microduplications. Proximal microdeletions are known as a susceptibility factor for thrombocytopenia-absent radius (TAR) syndrome, but it is unclear if these proximal microdeletions have other phenotypic consequences. Therefore, to elucidate the clinical significance of rearrangements of the proximal 1q21.1 region, we evaluated the phenotypes in patients identified with 1q21.1 rearrangements after referral for clinical microarray testing. We report clinical information for 55 probands with copy number variations (CNVs) involving proximal 1q21.1: 22 microdeletions and 20 reciprocal microduplications limited to proximal 1q21.1 and 13 microdeletions that include both the proximal and distal regions. Six individuals with proximal microdeletions have TAR syndrome. Three individuals with proximal microdeletions and two individuals with larger microdeletions of proximal and distal 1q21.1 have a ‘partial' TAR phenotype. Furthermore, one subject with TAR syndrome has a smaller, atypical deletion, narrowing the critical deletion region for the syndrome. Otherwise, phenotypic features varied among individuals with these microdeletions and microduplications. The recurrent, proximal 1q21.1 microduplications are enriched in our population undergoing genetic testing compared with control populations. Therefore, CNVs in proximal 1q21.1 can be a contributing factor for the development of abnormal phenotypes in some carriers.

Correction to: European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication 18 November 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.242 Since the publication of the above paper the authors have realised that they had omitted an important reference published online in this journal while their own paper was undergoing the review process.