Search

Therapy has improved the survival of heart failure (HF) patients. However, many patients progress to advanced chronic HF (ACHF). We propose a practical clinical definition and describe the characteristics of this condition. Patients that are generally recognised as ACHF often exhibit the following characteristics: 1) severe symptoms (NYHA class III to IV); 2) episodes with clinical signs of fluid retention and/or peripheral hypoperfusion; 3) objective evidence of severe cardiac dysfunction, shown by at least one of the following: left ventricular ejection fraction 1 HF hospitalisation in the past 6 months; 6) presence of all the previous features despite optimal therapy. This definition identifies a group of patients with compromised quality of life, poor prognosis, and a high risk of clinical events. These patients deserve effective therapeutic options and should be potential targets for future clinical research initiatives. (C) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Therapy has improved the survival of heart failure (HF) patients. However, many patients progress to advanced chronic HF (ACHF). We propose a practical clinical definition and describe the characteristics of this condition.Patients that are generally recognised as ACHF often exhibit the following characteristics: 1) severe symptoms (NYHA class III to IV); 2) episodes with clinical signs of fluid retention and/or peripheral hypoperfusion; 3) objective evidence of severe cardiac dysfunction, shown by at least one of the following: left ventricular ejection fraction 1 HF hospitalisation in the past 6 months; 6) presence of all the previous features despite optimal therapy. This definition identifies a group of patients with compromised quality of life, poor prognosis, and a high risk of clinical events. These patients deserve effective therapeutic options and should be potential targets for future clinical research initiatives. (C) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Background: Although discontinuation of chronic ACE inhibitor (ACEi) therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) is common in clinical practice, some clinical studies reported an increased incidence of ischemia-related events after withdrawal. To further address this issue, we assessed hemodynamic, neurohormonal and vascular consequences of withdrawing long-term ACEi treatment after experimental MI.Methods: Rats were subjected to coronary ligation to induce MI, and received quinapril (15 mg/kg/day) from 2 weeks to 14 months post-MI. Subsequently, surviving rats were randomized to sacrifice at 0, 4, and 6 weeks after ACEi withdrawal. Rats were studied for signs of heart failure, hemodynamics and cardiac function, neurohormones, and vascular edothelial function.Results: After discontinuation of ACEi treatment, plasma aldosterone levels increased between 0-4 weeks without further increment thereafter, suggesting persistent RAAS activation. Acetylcholine-induced aortic relaxation was impaired at 4 and 6 weeks, indicating rapid and sustained development of endothelial vasodilator dysfunction after withdrawal. Moreover, 24% of the rats developed heart failure signs (edema, dyspnea), and 3 rats died, all within 4 weeks after withdrawal, Significantly increased N-ANP levels and lung weights at 4, but not at 6 weeks suggest a transient volume overload. Finally, LV/body weight ratios significantly increased between 0-4 as well as 4-6 weeks, indicating progressive LV hypertrophy.Conclusions: The observed alterations after withdrawing long-term post-MI quinapril treatment in the present study may account for an increased risk for ischemic events. Thus, our findings highlight the potentially harmful effects associated with abrupt discontinuation of long-term post-MI ACE inhibition, and imply careful clinical consideration in this matter. (c) 2005 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.