Search

Aims: To evaluate right atrial (RA) morphology and deformation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)., Methods and Results: A total of 130 patients with either idiopathic (n = 70) or ischaemic (n = 60) DCM, and 60 controls underwent clinical examination, standard echocardiography, and RA two-dimensional strain echocardiography (2DSE). Six months after implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device, the DCM patients were re-evaluated, if their left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume had decreased by at least 15% they were defined as echocardiographic responders. All DCM patients were in NYHA class III before CRT, with a mean LV ejection fraction of 29.2 +/- 5.5%. After CRT, 94 patients were in NYHA functional class I-II. The patients were subdivided into echocardiographic responders (n = 85) and non-responders (n = 45). Both RA area index (19.7 +/- 5.5 cm(2)/m in non-responders vs. 13.2 +/- 4.4 cm(2)/m in responders; P < 0.001) and RA strain of lateral wall (24.3 +/- 10.2% in non-responders vs. 40.2 +/- 8.9% in responders; P < 0.001) were significantly different between the two groups. A RA area index >or=16 cm(2)/m showed a sensitivity and specificity of 87.1 and 95.4%, respectively (P < 0.0001) to predict a negative response to CRT. By multivariable analysis, increased RA area index (P < 0.001), ischaemic aetiology of DCM (P < 0.01), and less severe radial intraventricular dyssynchrony were independent determinants of an unfavourable response to CRT., Conclusion: Right atrial area index was increased and RA myocardial deformation was impaired in patients with DCM who were non-responders to CRT.

Aims: To evaluate whether quantification of the extent of scarred left ventricular (LV) tissue by speckle-tracking strain echo (2DSE) can predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)., Methods and Results: Forty-five patients (58.3 +/- 8.3 years; 24 males) with ischaemic DCM scheduled for CRT, and 25 controls were studied. A week before implantation all the patients underwent standard Doppler echo, 2DSE, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR). Clinical and echocardiographic evaluation was repeated 6 months after CRT. The patients were considered as responders to CRT if LV end-systolic volume decreased by 15%. In DCM patients, LV ejection fraction was 29.2 +/- 5.1%. By evaluating the 765 segments with MR, subendocardial infarct was identified in 17.0% and transmural infarct in 18.3%. With 2DSE, the average global longitudinal strain (GLS) was -23.1 +/- 3.6% in controls and -15.1 +/- 5.1% in DCM (P = 0.001). GLS showed a close correlation with total scar burden using MR (r = 0.64, P < 0.001). At follow-up, patients were subdivided into responders (n = 30; 66.7%) and non-responders (n = 15; 33.3%) to CRT. GLS was significantly different in non-responders than in responders (GLS: -10.4 +/- 5.1 in non-responders vs. -18.4 +/- 14% in responders, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, GLS (P < 0.0001) and radial intraventricular dyssynchrony (P < 0.001) were powerful independent determinants of response to CRT., Conclusion: GLS is strongly associated with total scar burden assessed by MR, and is an excellent independent predictor of response to CRT.