Search

The article discusses the HF-REVERT trial, which is the first trial to test the efficacy and safety of an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) in heart failure (HF). The trial focuses on patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after a myocardial infarction (MI). The ASO being tested, CDR132L, suppresses microRNA (miR)-132-3p, which is known to exacerbate adverse cardiac remodeling. The primary endpoint of the trial is the change in echocardiographic left ventricular end-systolic volume index at 6 months. The article highlights the potential of manipulating non-coding RNAs as a new therapeutic strategy for HF. [Extracted from the article]

B This article refers to 'Serial assessment of biomarkers and heart failure outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation' by K. Oyama I et al i ., published in this issue on pages 832-841. b The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), by far the most common cardiac arrhythmia, has risen over the last 30 years. Therefore, this data set offers no internal comparison of AF and sinus rhythm with respect to the performance of the three markers in predicting HF hospitalization or HF death. [Extracted from the article]

Cardiac remodelling refers to changes in left ventricular structure and function over time, with a progressive deterioration that may lead to heart failure (HF) development (adverse remodelling) or vice versa a recovery (reverse remodelling) in response to HF treatment. Adverse remodelling predicts a worse outcome, whilst reverse remodelling predicts a better prognosis. The geometry, systolic and diastolic function and electric activity of the left ventricle are affected, as well as the left atrium and on the long term even right heart chambers. At a cellular and molecular level, remodelling involves all components of cardiac tissue: cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and leucocytes. The molecular, cellular and histological signatures of remodelling may differ according to the cause and severity of cardiac damage, and clearly to the global trend toward worsening or recovery. These processes cannot be routinely evaluated through endomyocardial biopsies, but may be reflected by circulating levels of several biomarkers. Different classes of biomarkers (e.g. proteins, non‐coding RNAs, metabolites and/or epigenetic modifications) and several biomarkers of each class might inform on some aspects on HF development, progression and long‐term outcomes, but most have failed to enter clinical practice. This may be due to the biological complexity of remodelling, so that no single biomarker could provide great insight on remodelling when assessed alone. Another possible reason is a still incomplete understanding of the role of biomarkers in the pathophysiology of cardiac remodelling. Such role will be investigated in the first part of this review paper on biomarkers of cardiac remodelling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B This article refers to 'Urinary peptides in heart failure: a link to molecular pathophysiology' by T. He I et al i ., published in this issue on pages 1875-1887. b Proteomic screening of blood and/or urine is gaining prominence as a method to aid discovery of candidate biomarkers to elucidate the molecular basis of disease along with potential applications in clinical diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment decision-making. Urinary peptides in heart failure - the need for care with pees and cues However, whether or not filtration of larger molecular weight peptides out of urine samples (post-sample dilution in SDS containing buffers) also removes bound smaller peptides that could provide extra information remains unknown. [Extracted from the article]

Normal median plasma concentrations have been reported at 12 ng/L with a 99th centile upper limit of 87 ng/L and plasma cMyC is measurable in well over 99% of normal subjects using a recently validated sensitive assay.5 Hence cMyC is some fivefold more abundant in plasma than cardiac troponins. The natriuretic peptides, particularly B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), are endorsed by all authoritative guidelines as a highly recommended aid in the diagnosis of acute HF (AHF).1,2 They are reflective of intra-cardiac haemodynamic load. B This article refers to 'Cardiac myosin-binding protein C in the diagnosis and risk stratification of acute heart failure' by N. Kozhuharov I et al i ., published in this issue on pages 716-725. b Biomarkers have become a well-established part of the diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF). [Extracted from the article]

With increasing cardiac dysfunction, a complex neurohormonal response results in increasing circulating levels of an array of plasma hormones. Increments in plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and their amino-terminal congeners are more closely related to cardiac structure and function and to cardiovascular prognosis than changes in other plasma neurohormones. Reports suggest that changes in plasma BNP levels in the course of treatment of acutely decompensated heart failure provide a more powerful prognostic indicator of the likelihood of survival or recurrent decompensation than symptomatic assessment. This observation requires a randomised controlled trial in which changes in peptide levels determine aggression and duration of in-patient therapy in order to establish whether this indicator can improve results from management of acute in-patient heart failure. Plasma BNP or NT-proBNP is a powerful independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in long-term follow-up of heart failure cohorts. In addition, it appears likely to be a good predictor of beneficial response to the addition of beta blockade to anti-heart failure pharmacotherapy. Finally, adjustment of therapy for heart failure according to serial measurements of NT-proBNP promises to improve outcomes in comparison with adjusting therapy according to unassisted clinical acumen. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Aims Methods and results Conclusions Soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) and placental growth factor (PlGF), components of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) system, play key roles in angiogenesis. Reports of elevated plasma levels of sFlt‐1 and PlGF in coronary heart disease and heart failure (HF) led us to investigate their utility, and VEGF system gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), as prognostic biomarkers in HF.ELISA assays for sFlt‐1, PlGF and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) were performed on baseline plasma samples from the PEOPLE cohort (n = 890), a study of outcomes among patients after an episode of acute decompensated HF. Eight SNPs potentially associated with sFlt‐1 or PlGF levels were genotyped. sFlt‐1 and PlGF were assayed in 201 subjects from the Canterbury Healthy Volunteers Study (CHVS) matched to PEOPLE participants. All‐cause death was the major endpoint for clinical outcome considered. In PEOPLE participants, mean plasma levels for both sFlt‐1 (125 ± 2.01 pg/ml) and PlGF (17.5 ± 0.21 pg/ml) were higher (both p < 0.044) than in the CHVS cohort (81.2 ± 1.31 pg/ml and 15.5 ± 0.32 pg/ml, respectively). sFlt‐1 was higher in HF with reduced ejection fraction compared to HF with preserved ejection fraction (p = 0.005). The PGF gene SNP rs2268616 was univariately associated with death (p = 0.016), and was also associated with PlGF levels, as was rs2268614 genotype. Cox proportional hazards modelling (n = 695, 246 deaths) showed plasma sFlt‐1, but not PlGF, predicted survival (hazard ratio 6.44, 95% confidence interval 2.57–16.1; p < 0.001) in PEOPLE, independent of age, NT‐proBNP, ischaemic aetiology, diabetic status and beta‐blocker therapy.Plasma sFlt‐1 concentrations have potential as an independent predictor of survival and may be complementary to established prognostic biomarkers in HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Pathophysiological differences between patients with heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction (EF) remain unclear. Therefore we used a phenomics approach, integrating selected proteomics data with patient characteristics and cardiac structural and functional parameters, to get insight into differential pathophysiological mechanisms and identify potential treatment targets. Methods and results: We report data from a representative subcohort of the prospective Singapore Heart Failure Outcomes and Phenotypes (SHOP), including patients with HFrEF (EF <40%, n = 217), HFpEF (EF ≥50%, n = 213), and age‐ and sex‐matched controls without HF (n = 216). We measured 92 biomarkers using a proximity extension assay and assessed cardiac structure and function in all participants using echocardiography. We used multi‐block projection to latent structure analysis to integrate clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker variables. Candidate biomarker targets were cross‐referenced with small‐molecule and drug databases. The total cohort had a median age of 65 years (interquartile range 60–71), and 50% were women. Protein profiles strongly discriminated patients with HFrEF (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.89) and HFpEF (AUC = 0.94) from controls. Phenomics analyses identified unique druggable inflammatory markers in HFpEF from the tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF), which were positively associated with hypertension, diabetes, and increased posterior and relative wall thickness. In HFrEF, interleukin (IL)‐8 and IL‐6 were possible targets related to lower EF and worsening renal function. Conclusion: We identified pathophysiological mechanisms related to increased cardiac wall thickness parameters and potentially druggable inflammatory markers from the TNFRSF in HFpEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). For example, among healthy individuals, BNP concentrations average <=10 pg/mL; interestingly, while NT-proBNP concentrations are often much higher than BNP in the presence of prevalent HF, in healthy individuals NT-proBNP is often as very low as BNP. After the first proof of principle for B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a diagnostic aid for acute heart failure (AHF) was reported by Davis I et al i . in 1994,1 the Breathing Not Properly (BNP) study, published in 2002, ushered in a new era for natriuretic peptides (NPs) as companion biomarkers for the diagnosis of heart failure (HF).2 More than just a clinical trial with novel and favourable results, it revolutionized a whole field and introduced biomarkers and the molecular phenotyping of the heart to algorithms in use for HF diagnosis and management. The "Peptide for Life" Initiative: a call for action to provide equal access to the use of natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis of acute heart failure across Europe. [Extracted from the article]

Aims: To examine sex differences in clinical characteristics, echocardiographic features, quality of life and 1-year death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization outcomes in patients with/without diabetes mellitus (DM).Methods and Results: Utilizing the Asian Sudden Cardiac Death in HF (ASIAN-HF) registry, 5255 patients (mean age 59.6 ± 13.1, 78% men) with symptomatic HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were stratified by DM status to address the research aims. Despite similar prevalence of DM between Asian men (43%) and women (42%), the odds of DM increased at lower body mass index in women vs. men (≥ 23 vs. ≥ 27.5 kg/m2 , Pinteraction  = 0.014). DM was more strongly related to chronic kidney disease in women vs. men [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-2.57 vs. OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11-1.56, Pinteraction  = 0.009]. Sex also modified the relationship between DM and left ventricular geometry (Pinteraction  = 0.003), whereby DM was associated with a more concentric left ventricular geometry in women than men. Women had lower quality of life than men (P < 0.001), in both DM and non-DM groups. DM was associated with worse composite outcomes at 1 year in women vs. men [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% CI 1.24-2.60 vs. HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.56; Pinteraction  = 0.005).Conclusions: Asian women with HFrEF were more likely to have DM despite a lean body mass index, a greater burden of chronic kidney disease and more concentric left ventricular geometry, compared to men. Furthermore, DM confers worse quality of life, irrespective of sex, and a greater risk of adverse outcomes in women than men. These data underscore the need for sex-specific approaches to diabetes in patients with HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The approval of new heart failure (HF) therapies has slowed over the past two decades in part due to the high costs of conducting large randomized clinical trials that are needed to adequately power major clinical endpoint studies. Several biomarkers have been identified reflecting different elements of HF pathophysiology, with possible applications in diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and even in the design of clinical trials. Biomarkers could potentially be used to refine study inclusion criteria to enable enrolment of patients who are more likely to respond to a therapeutic intervention, despite being at sufficient risk to meet pre‐determined study endpoint rates. When there is a close relationship between biomarker levels and clinical endpoints, changes in biomarker levels after a given treatment can act as a surrogate endpoint, potentially reducing the duration and cost of a clinical trial. Natriuretic peptides have been widely used in clinical trials with a variable amount of added value, which such variation being probably due to the absence of a close pathophysiological connection to the study drug. Notable exceptions to this include sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat. Future studies should seek to adopt unbiased approaches for discovery of true companion diagnostics; with ‐omics‐based tools, biomarkers might be more precisely selected for use in clinical trials to identify responses that closely reflect the biological effects of the drug under investigation. Finally, biomarkers associated with cardiac damage and remodelling, such as cardiac troponin, could be employed as safety endpoints provided that standardization between different assays is achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Congestion is a cardinal sign of heart failure (HF). In the past, it was seen as a homogeneous epiphenomenon that identified patients with advanced HF. However, current evidence shows that congestion in HF varies in quantity and distribution. This updated view advocates for a congestive‐driven classification of HF according to onset (acute vs. chronic), regional distribution (systemic vs. pulmonary), compartment of distribution (intravascular vs. extravascular), and clinical vs. subclinical. Thus, this review will focus on the utility of circulating biomarkers for assessing and managing the different fluid overload phenotypes. This discussion focused on the clinical utility of the natriuretic peptides, carbohydrate antigen 125 (also called mucin 16), bio‐adrenomedullin and mid‐regional pro‐adrenomedullin, ST2 (also known as interleukin‐1 receptor‐like 1), cluster of differentiation 146, troponin, C‐terminal pro‐endothelin‐1, and parameters of haemoconcentration. The utility of circulation biomarkers on top of clinical evaluation, haemodynamics, and imaging needs to be better determined by dedicated studies. Some multiparametric frameworks in which these tools contribute to management are proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Different associations between epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and cardiac function have been suggested in patients with heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF). However, few studies have directly compared the association between EAT and left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) function in patients with HFpEF and HFrEF/HFmrEF. Methods and results: We studied EAT thickness using transthoracic echocardiography in a multicentre cohort of 149 community‐dwelling controls without heart failure, 99 patients with HFpEF, and 366 patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF. EAT thickness was averaged from parasternal long‐axis and short‐axis views, respectively, and off‐line speckle tracking analysis was performed to quantify LA and LV function. Data were validated in an independent cohort of 626 controls, 243 patients with HFpEF, and 180 patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF. For LV function, LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was measured in both derivation and validation cohorts. For LA function, LAGLS at reservoir, contractile and conduit phase were measured in the derivation cohort, and only LAGLS at reservoir phase was measured in the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, EAT thickness was lower in HFrEF/HFmrEF (7.3 ± 2.5 mm) compared to HFpEF (8.3 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.05) and controls (7.9 ± 1.8 mm, p < 0.05). Greater EAT thickness was associated with better LV and contractile LA function in HFrEF/HFmrEF, but not in HFpEF (p for interaction <0.05). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort, where EAT thickness was lower in HFrEF/HFmrEF (6.7 ± 1.4 mm) compared to HFpEF (9.6 ± 2.8 mm; p < 0.05) and controls (7.7 ± 2.3 mm; p < 0.05). Greater EAT thickness was associated with better LV and reservoir LA function in patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF but worse LV and reservoir LA function in patients with HFpEF (p for interaction <0.05). Thickened EAT (EAT thickness >10 mm) was associated with LA dysfunction (LAGLS at reservoir phase <23%) in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF/HFmrEF. Conclusion: Epicardial adipose tissue thickness is greater in patients with HFpEF than HFrEF/HFmrEF. Increased EAT thickness is associated with worse LA and LV function in HFpEF but the opposite in HFrEF/HFmrEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Previous analyses suggest that heart failure (HF) therapy guided by (N-terminal pro-)brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) might be dependent on left ventricular ejection fraction, age and co-morbidities, but the reasons remain unclear.Methods and Results: To determine interactions between (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy and HF with reduced [ejection fraction (EF) ≤45%; HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), n = 1731] vs. preserved EF [EF > 45%; HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), n = 301] and co-morbidities (hypertension, renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular insult, peripheral vascular disease) on outcome, individual patient data (n = 2137) from eight NT-proBNP guidance trials were analysed using Cox-regression with multiplicative interaction terms. Endpoints were mortality and admission because of HF. Whereas in HFrEF patients (NT-pro)BNP-guided compared with symptom-guided therapy resulted in lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.97, P = 0.03] and fewer HF admissions (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, P = 0.02), no such effect was seen in HFpEF (mortality: HR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.76-1.96, P = 0.41; HF admissions HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.67-1.53, P = 0.97; interactions P < 0.02). Age (74 ± 11 years) interacted with treatment strategy allocation independently of EF regarding mortality (P = 0.02), but not HF admission (P = 0.54). The interaction of age and mortality was explained by the interaction of treatment strategy allocation with co-morbidities. In HFpEF, renal failure provided strongest interaction (P < 0.01; increased risk of (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy if renal failure present), whereas in HFrEF patients, the presence of at least two of the following co-morbidities provided strongest interaction (P < 0.01; (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy beneficial only if none or one of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, cardiovascular insult, or peripheral vascular disease present). (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy was harmful in HFpEF patients without hypertension (P = 0.02).Conclusion: The benefits of therapy guided by (NT-pro)BNP were present in HFrEF only. Co-morbidities seem to influence the response to (NT-pro)BNP-guided therapy and may explain the lower efficacy of this approach in elderly patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with heart failure, the beneficial effects of drug and device therapies counteract to some extent ongoing cardiac damage. According to the net balance between these two factors, cardiac geometry and function may improve (reverse remodelling, RR) and even completely normalize (remission), or vice versa progressively deteriorate (adverse remodelling, AR). RR or remission predict a better prognosis, while AR has been associated with worsening clinical status and outcomes. The remodelling process ultimately involves all cardiac chambers, but has been traditionally evaluated in terms of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. This is the second part of a review paper by the Study Group on Biomarkers of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to ventricular remodelling. This document examines the proposed criteria to diagnose RR and AR, their prevalence and prognostic value, and the variables predicting remodelling in patients managed according to current guidelines. Much attention will be devoted to RR in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction because most studies on cardiac remodelling focused on this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: The Ile164 variant of the β2-adrenoceptor has been shown to alter cardiovascular phenotypes and adversely affect survival in heart failure patients. Aims: We aimed to replicate this observation by genotyping a cohort of 451 heart failure patients for the Ile164 polymorphism. Methods: Patient outcome was recorded over a median follow-up period of 3.09 years, and genotypes were derived by multiplex amplification refractory mutation system PCR. Results: Genotypes were obtained for 443 patients, and 3.2% of these (14 patients) were heterozygous for the Ile164 SNP. Demographic data, cardiac function and neurohormonal profiles did not differ between genotype groups. Ile164 genotype did not significantly affect survival in this cohort (Thr164 homozygotes 48.9%, Ile164 heterozygous 42.9%, p =0.66), although multivariate analysis suggested that β-blocker treatment may negatively impact survival in the heterozygote group. Conclusion: This study suggests that the Ile164 polymorphism of the β2-adrenoceptor does not have a major impact on outcome in individuals with heart failure, although it''s potential interaction with β-blockers requires further examination. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: The Ile164 variant of the β2-adrenoceptor has been shown to alter cardiovascular phenotypes and adversely affect survival in heart failure patients. Aims: We aimed to replicate this observation by genotyping a cohort of 451 heart failure patients for the Ile164 polymorphism. Methods: Patient outcome was recorded over a median follow-up period of 3.09 years, and genotypes were derived by multiplex amplification refractory mutation system PCR. Results: Genotypes were obtained for 443 patients, and 3.2% of these (14 patients) were heterozygous for the Ile164 SNP. Demographic data, cardiac function and neurohormonal profiles did not differ between genotype groups. Ile164 genotype did not significantly affect survival in this cohort (Thr164 homozygotes 48.9%, Ile164 heterozygous 42.9%, p =0.66), although multivariate analysis suggested that β-blocker treatment may negatively impact survival in the heterozygote group. Conclusion: This study suggests that the Ile164 polymorphism of the β2-adrenoceptor does not have a major impact on outcome in individuals with heart failure, although it''s potential interaction with β-blockers requires further examination. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

New biomarkers are being evaluated for their ability to advance the management of patients with heart failure. Despite a large pool of interesting candidate biomarkers, besides natriuretic peptides virtually none have succeeded in being applied into the clinical setting. In this review, we examine the most promising emerging candidates for clinical assessment and management of patients with heart failure. We discuss high‐sensitivity cardiac troponins (Tn), procalcitonin, novel kidney markers, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), galectin‐3, growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15), cluster of differentiation 146 (CD146), neprilysin, adrenomedullin (ADM), and also discuss proteomics and genetic‐based risk scores. We focused on guidance and assistance with daily clinical care decision‐making. For each biomarker, analytical considerations are discussed, as well as performance regarding diagnosis and prognosis. Furthermore, we discuss potential implementation in clinical algorithms and in ongoing clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP), high‐sensitivity troponin T (hs‐TnT) and soluble suppression of tumorigenesis‐2 (sST2) predict outcome in chronic heart failure (HF). We assessed the influence of age on circulating levels and prognostic significance of these biomarkers. Methods and results: Individual data from 5301 patients with chronic HF and NT‐proBNP, hs‐TnT, and sST2 data were evaluated. Patients were stratified according to age: <60 years (n = 1332, 25%), 60–69 years (n = 1628, 31%), 70–79 years (n = 1662, 31%), and ≥ 80 years (n = 679, 13%). Patients (median age 66 years, 75% men, median left ventricular ejection fraction 28%, 64% with ischaemic HF) had median NT‐proBNP 1564 ng/L, hs‐TnT 21 ng/L, and sST2 29 ng/mL. Age independently predicted NT‐proBNP and hs‐TnT, but not sST2. The best NT‐proBNP and hs‐TnT cut‐offs for 1‐year and 5‐year all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality and 1‐ to 12‐month HF hospitalization increased with age, while the best sST2 cut‐offs did not. When stratifying patients according to age‐ and outcome‐specific cut‐offs, this stratification yielded independent prognostic significance over NT‐proBNP levels only, or the composite of NT‐proBNP and hs‐TnT, and improved risk prediction for most endpoints. Finally, absolute NT‐proBNP, hs‐TnT, and sST2 levels predicted outcomes independent of age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction category, ethnic group, and other variables. Conclusions: Soluble ST2 is less influenced by age than NT‐proBNP or hs‐TnT; all these biomarkers predict outcome regardless of age. The use of age‐ and outcome‐specific cut‐offs of NT‐proBNP, hs‐TnT and sST2 allows more accurate risk stratification than NT‐proBNP alone or the combination of NT‐proBNP and hs‐TnT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and β-blockers are guideline-recommended first-line therapies in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Previous studies showed that individual drug classes were under-dosed in many parts of Europe and Asia. In this study, we investigated the association of combined up-titration of ACEi/ARBs and β-blockers with all-cause mortality and its combination with hospitalization for HF.Methods and Results: A total of 6787 HFrEF patients (mean age 62.6 ± 13.2 years, 77.7% men, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 27.7 ± 7.2%) were enrolled in the prospective multinational European (BIOSTAT-CHF; n = 2100) and Asian (ASIAN-HF; n = 4687) studies. Outcomes were analysed according to achieved percentage of guideline-recommended target doses (GRTD) of combination ACEi/ARB and β-blocker therapy, adjusted for indication bias. Only 14% (n = 981) patients achieved ≥50% GRTD for both ACEi/ARB and β-blocker. The best outcomes were observed in patients who achieved 100% GRTD of both ACEi/ARB and β-blocker [hazard ratio (HR) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.39 vs. none]. Lower dose of combined therapy was associated with better outcomes than 100% GRTD of either monotherapy. Up-titrating β-blockers was associated with a consistent and greater reduction in hazards of all-cause mortality (HR for 100% GRTD: 0.40, 95% CI 0.25-0.63) than corresponding ACEi/ARB up-titration (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.53-1.07).Conclusion: This study shows that best outcomes were observed in patients attaining GRTD for both ACEi/ARB and β-blockers, unfortunately this was rarely achieved. Achieving >50% GRTD of both drug classes was associated with better outcome than target dose of monotherapy. Up-titrating β-blockers to target dose was associated with greater mortality reduction than up-titrating ACEi/ARB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The performance of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in diagnosing acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) among patients presenting with breathlessness is markedly impaired in the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the diagnostic performance of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and cardiac troponin T as possible alternative markers for discrimination of ADHF in this setting.Methods and Results: Breathless patients (n = 1107) were prospectively and contemporaneously recruited in emergency departments in Singapore and New Zealand. The diagnoses of ADHF and presence of AF were adjudicated by two clinician specialists, blinded to MR-proADM, NT-proBNP and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) results. MR-proADM exhibited strong discrimination of ADHF with little change in performance irrespective of the presence of AF (area under the curve 0.83 in non-AF vs. 0.76 in AF) compared to NT-proBNP (0.91 vs. 0.71) and hs-cTnT (0.83 vs. 0.62), respectively. The accuracy of MR-proADM (73.3%) for diagnosing ADHF among patients with AF was superior to both NT-proBNP (61.6%) and hs-cTnT (64.6%). The superior performance of MR-proADM remained apparent when data from Singapore and New Zealand were analysed separately.Conclusion: In the presence of AF, MR-proADM showed greater discrimination and accuracy, and less impairment in performance compared to that in non-AF cases, for the diagnosis of ADHF, compared to the guideline-endorsed NT-proBNP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Natriuretic peptide [NP; B-type NP (BNP), N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP), and midregional proANP (MR-proANP)] concentrations are quantitative plasma biomarkers for the presence and severity of haemodynamic cardiac stress and heart failure (HF). End-diastolic wall stress, intracardiac filling pressures, and intracardiac volumes seem to be the dominant triggers. This paper details the most important indications for NPs and highlights 11 key principles underlying their clinical use shown below. NPs should always be used in conjunction with all other clinical information. NPs are reasonable surrogates for intracardiac volumes and filling pressures. NPs should be measured in all patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of HF such as dyspnoea and/or fatigue, as their use facilitates the early diagnosis and risk stratification of HF. NPs have very high diagnostic accuracy in discriminating HF from other causes of dyspnoea: the higher the NP, the higher the likelihood that dyspnoea is caused by HF. Optimal NP cut-off concentrations for the diagnosis of acute HF (very high filling pressures) in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnoea are higher compared with those used in the diagnosis of chronic HF in patients with dyspnoea on exertion (mild increase in filling pressures at rest). Obese patients have lower NP concentrations, mandating the use of lower cut-off concentrations (about 50% lower). In stable HF patients, but also in patients with other cardiac disorders such as myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation or pulmonary embolism, NP concentrations have high prognostic accuracy for death and HF hospitalization. Screening with NPs for the early detection of relevant cardiac disease including left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular risk factors may help to identify patients at increased risk, therefore allowing targeted preventive measures to prevent HF. BNP, NT-proBNP and MR-proANP have comparable diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. In patients with shock, NPs cannot be used to identify cause (e.g. cardiogenic vs. septic shock), but remain prognostic. NPs cannot identify the underlying cause of HF and, therefore, if elevated, must always be used in conjunction with cardiac imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a global public health problem. Unfortunately, little is known about HFpEF across Asia.Methods and Results: We prospectively studied clinical characteristics, echocardiographic parameters and outcomes in 1204 patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) from 11 Asian regions, grouped as Northeast Asia (Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, Japan, Korea, n = 543), South Asia (India, n = 252), and Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines, n = 409). Mean age was 68 ±12 years (37% were < 65 years) and 50% were women. Seventy per cent of patients had ≥2 co-morbidities, most commonly hypertension (71%), followed by anaemia (57%), chronic kidney disease (50%), diabetes (45%), coronary artery disease (29%), atrial fibrillation (29%) and obesity (26%). Southeast Asian patients had the highest prevalence of all co-morbidities except atrial fibrillation, South Asians had the lowest prevalence of all co-morbidities except anaemia and obesity, and Northeast Asians had more atrial fibrillation. Left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric remodelling were most prominent among Southeast and South Asians, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall, 12.1% of patients died or were hospitalized for heart failure within 1 year. Southeast Asians were at higher risk for adverse outcomes, independent of co-morbidity burden and cardiac geometry.Conclusion: These first prospective multinational data from Asia show that HFpEF affects relatively young patients with a high burden of co-morbidities. Regional differences in types of co-morbidities, cardiac remodelling and outcomes of HFpEF across Asia have important implications for public health measures and global HFpEF trial design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Serial measurement of natriuretic peptides may guide management in heart failure (HF) patients. In previous trials, natriuretic peptides were infrequently monitored, which may undervalue the benefit of this approach.Methods and Results: HOME was an adaptive three-arm randomized clinical study to test whether home monitoring of BNP could reduce HF-related death, hospitalization due to acute decompensated HF (ADHF), and ADHF treated with intravenous diuretics in the emergency department or outpatient setting. Enrolment was terminated early because of slow enrolment, low event rates, and the belief that an algorithm for assessing BNP trends was needed. Justification for pooling data from all study arms was made and analysis as a single observational study was performed. The analysis resulted in 107 patients who were monitored for a median of 172 days with BNP measures on a median of 74% of days. BNP values were highly variable within a patient. Dispersion between serial BNPs was calculated to be 39.3%, 57.7%, and 73.6% for 1, 60, and 120 days between measures, respectively. A moving average filter (fBNP) was calculated to reduce day-to-day fluctuations and track changes from week to week. There were 27 primary events in 17 362 patient days of monitoring; the hazard ratio for time-varying fBNP was 2.22 (95% confidence interval 1.48-3.34) per unit natural log (corresponding to a 2.72-fold change in fBNP level).Conclusion: The HOME HF study demonstrates the feasibility of home BNP measurement and shows the potential value of fBNP as an index of emerging clinical deterioration. Assessment of the clinical value of this is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is recognized as a major prognostic factor in left-sided heart failure (HF). However, the relative contribution of RV dysfunction in HF with preserved (HFpEF) vs. reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unclear. Methodsand results: Right ventricular longitudinal strain (RVLS), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) were determined by echocardiography in 657 age- and gender-matched groups of patients with HFpEF [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) =50%; n=219] and HFrEF (LVEF <50%; n=219) and in controls without HF (n=219) from an Asian population-based cohort study. Across control to HFpEF and HFrEF groups, RV function deteriorated as measured by RVLS (-26.7±5%, -22.7±6.6% and -18.2±6.7%, respectively) and TAPSE (21.0±3.9, 17.5±5.1 and 14.7±4.7 mm, respectively), whereas PASP increased (26.8±7.1, 34.5±11.9 and 39.3±16.2 mmHg, respectively) (all P<0.001). Controlling for PASP in control, HFpEF and HFrEF subjects, the magnitude of RVLS/PASP (-1.06±0.32, -0.75±0.32 and -0.56±0.36, respectively) and TAPSE/PASP ratios (0.83±0.23, 0.54±0.24 and 0.55±0.29, respectively) similarly decreased across groups. Right ventricular dysfunction (by both TAPSE and RVLS) was independently associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation, but not with PASP. Among patients with HF, both TAPSE/PASP and RVLS/PASP ratios were related to the composite endpoint of all-cause death and HF hospitalization, even after multivariable adjustment [hazard ratio (HR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.74 and HR 3.09; 95% CI 1.52-6.26, respectively], with no difference between HFrEF and HFpEF. Conclusions: Right ventricular dysfunction is present in HFpEF and is even more pronounced in HFrEF for any given degree of pulmonary hypertension. It is independently predicted by left ventricular dysfunction but not by PASP. Right ventricular-arterial coupling is prognostically important in HF regardless of LVEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Circulating biomarkers are important in the diagnosis, risk stratification and management of patients with heart failure (HF). Given the current lack of biomarkers in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), we aimed to investigate the prognostic performance of the newly developed high-sensitivity (hs) assays for cardiac troponin I (hsTnI) compared with troponin T (hsTnT) for adverse events in HFpEF vs. HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Findings in these two HF subgroups were also compared with those in the recently defined HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) subgroup.Methods and Results: Both hsTnI and hsTnT were measured in 1096 patients with HFrEF [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%; n = 853] or HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%; n = 243) enrolled in the Singapore Heart Failure Outcomes and Phenotypes (SHOP) study. Both troponin assays were more strongly associated with the composite endpoint (all-cause mortality or first rehospitalization for HF) in HFpEF than in HFrEF. The hsTnT assay provided the greatest additional prognostic value in HFpEF in comparison with hsTnI and NT-proBNP. TnI was more strongly associated with composite events in men with HFpEF [hazard ratio (HR) 3.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82-6.09; P < 0.001 per standard deviation (SD) increase in log-transformed hsTnI] than in women with HFpEF (HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.94-1.93; P = 0.10 per SD increase in log-transformed hsTnI).Conclusions: There is a potential role for the prognostic use of high-sensitivity troponin assays, particularly hsTnT, in men and women with HFpEF. The predictive association of hsTnI with outcome appears strongest in men with HFpEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This study was conducted to test the diagnostic performance of NT-proBNP for discrimination of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) among breathless patients presenting in an Asian compared with a Western centre.Methods and Results: Patients with breathlessness were prospectively and contemporaneously recruited in Emergency Departments in Singapore and New Zealand (NZ). The diagnosis of ADHF was adjudicated by two clinician specialists. A total of 606 patients were recruited in Singapore and 500 in NZ. The discriminative power of NT-proBNP for ADHF was superior in Singapore compared with NZ [area under the curve (AUC) 0.926 vs. 0.866; P = 0.012] both overall and among selected subgroups stratified according to age, renal function, body mass index, and presence or absence of AF or diabetes. Previously established cut-off point values of plasma NT-proBNP yielded comparable sensitivity and negative predictive values, but superior specificity and accuracy in Singapore compared with NZ. The difference in test performance was driven by the younger age (median age 56 years vs. 73 years; P < 0.001), associated with better renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate 89 vs. 62 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; P < 0.001), and lower prevalence of AF (9.7% vs. 25.7%; P < 0.001) in acutely breathless patients in Singapore.Conclusion: Considering emerging evidence of a lower average age of presentation with ADHF over most of Asia compared with Western countries, NT-proBNP is likely to be more accurate when applied in Asian centres than in the West. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Anaemia is increasingly recognized as having an independent impact upon patient outcomes in cardiac disease. The role of novel iron therapies to treat anaemia is increasing. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of iron therapies for the treatment of adults with anaemia.Methods and Results: Electronic databases and search engines were searched as per Cochrane methodology. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of iron vs. inactive control or placebo, as well as alternative formulations, doses, and routes in anaemic adults without chronic kidney disease or in the peri-partum period were eligible. The primary outcome of interest was mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were blood transfusion, haemoglobin levels, quality of life, serious adverse events, and length of hospital stay. A total of 64 RCTs (including five studies of heart failure patients) comprising 9004 participants were included. None of the studies was at a low risk of bias. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality between iron and inactive control. Both oral and parenteral iron significantly reduced the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion compared with inactive control [risk ratio (RR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.90; and RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, respectively]. Haemoglobin was increased more by both oral and parenteral iron compared with inactive control [mean difference (MD) 0.91 g/dL, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.35; and MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.57, respectively], and parenteral iron demonstrated a greater increase when compared with oral iron (MD 0.53 g/dL, 95% CI 0.31-0.75). In all comparisons, there were no differences in the results comparing patients with and without heart failure.Conclusion: Both oral and parenteral iron are shown to decrease the proportion of people who require blood transfusion and increase haemoglobin levels, without any benefit on mortality. Further trials at a low risk of bias, powered to measure clinically significant endpoints, are still required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is a cytokine highly expressed in states of inflammatory stress. We aimed to study the clinical correlates and prognostic significance of plasma GDF15 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF), compared with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), an indicator of haemodynamic wall stress.Methods: Plasma GDF15 and NT-proBNP were prospectively measured in 916 consecutive patients with HFrEF (EF <50%; n = 730) and HFpEF (EF ≥50%; n = 186), and measured again at 6 months in 488 patients. Patients were followed up for a composite outcome of death or first HF rehospitalization.Results: Median GDF15baseline values were similarly elevated in HFpEF [2862 (1812 represent the 25th percentile and 4176 represent the 75th percentile) ng/L] and HFrEF [2517 (1555, 4030) ng/L] (P = 0.184), whereas NT-proBNP was significantly lower in HFpEF than HFrEF (1119 ng/L vs. 2335 ng/L, P < 0.001). Independent correlates of GDF15baseline were age, systolic blood pressure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, sodium, haemoglobin, creatinine, diuretic therapy, high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) and NT-proBNP (all P < 0.05). During a median follow-up of 23 months, there were 379 events (307 HFrEF, 72 HFpEF). GDF15 remained a significant independent predictor for composite outcome even after adjusting for important clinical predictors including hsTnT and NT-proBNP (adjusted hazard ratio 1.76 per 1 Ln U, 95% confidence interval 1.39-2.21; P < 0.001), regardless of HF group (Pinteraction  = 0.275). GDF15baseline provided incremental prognostic value when added to clinical predictors, hsTnT and NT-proBNP (area under receiver operating characteristic curve increased from 0.720 to 0.740, P < 0.019), with a net reclassification improvement of 0.183 (P = 0.004). Patients with ≥20% GDF156months increase had higher risk for composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.15-2.45; P = 0.007) compared with those with GDF156months within ± 20% of baseline.Conclusions: The similarly elevated levels and independent prognostic utility of GDF15 in HFrEF and HFpEF suggest that beyond haemodynamic stress (NT-proBNP), inflammatory injury (GDF15) may play an important role in both HF syndromes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate the relationship between heart rate and survival in patients with heart failure (HF) and coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods and Results: Patients with AF included in the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) meta-analysis were the main focus of this analysis (3259 patients from 17 studies). The outcome was all-cause mortality at 3 years. Heart rate was analysed as a categorical (tertiles; T1 ≤77 b.p.m., T2 78-98 b.p.m., T3 ≥98 b.p.m.) and continuous variable. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risk of all-cause death between tertiles of baseline heart rate. Patients in the highest tertile were more often female, less likely to have an ischaemic aetiology or diabetes, had a lower ejection fraction but higher blood pressure and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Higher heart rate was associated with higher mortality in patients with sinus rhythm (SR) but not in those in AF. In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) and AF, death rates per 100 patient years were lowest in the highest heart rate tertile (T1 18.9 vs. T3 15.9) but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). In patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF), death rates per 100 patient years were highest in the highest heart rate tertile (T1 14.6 vs. T3 16.0, P = 0.014). However, after adjustment for other important prognostic variables, higher heart rate was no longer associated with higher mortality in HF-PEF (or HF-REF).Conclusions: In this meta-analysis of patients with HF, heart rate does not have the same prognostic significance in patients in AF as it does in those in SR, irrespective of ejection fraction or treatment with beta-blocker. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Agents with vasodilator properties (AVDs) are frequently used in the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF). AVDs rapidly reduce preload and afterload, improve left ventricle to aorta and right ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling, and may improve symptoms. Early biomarker changes after AVD administration have suggested potentially beneficial effects on cardiac stretch, vascular tone, and renal function. AVDs that reduce haemodynamic congestion without causing hypoperfusion might be effective in preventing worsening organ dysfunction. Existing AVDs have been associated with different results on outcomes in randomized clinical trials, and observational studies have suggested that AVDs may be associated with a clinical outcome benefit. Lessons have been learned from past AVD trials in AHF regarding preventing hypotension, selecting the optimal endpoint, refining dyspnoea measurements, and achieving early randomization and treatment initiation. These lessons have been applied to the design of ongoing pivotal clinical trials, which aim to ascertain if AVDs improve clinical outcomes. The developing body of evidence suggests that AVDs may be a clinically effective therapy to reduce symptoms, but more importantly to prevent end-organ damage and improve clinical outcomes for specific patients with AHF. The results of ongoing trials will provide more clarity on the role of AVDs in the treatment of AHF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Current heart failure ( HF) guidelines highlight the importance of iron deficiency (ID) in HF. Whether HF itself or age-related comorbidities contribute to ID is uncertain, and previous data were limited to Western populations. We aimed to study the prevalence, clinical correlates, functional significance and prognosis of ID in HF patients, compared with community-based controls in a multi-ethnic Southeast Asian population. Methods and results Iron status was assessed in 751 HF patients (age 62.0 ± 12.2 years, 75.5% men, 64.7% Chinese, 23.9% Malay, 10.2% Indian) and 601 controls (age 56.9 ± 10.4 years, 49.8% men, 70.9% Chinese, 21.5% Malay, 7.2% Indian). ID, defined as ferritin <100 µg/L or ferritin 100-300 µg/L and transferrin saturation (Tsat) <20%, was present in 39.3% of controls and 61.4% of HF [odds ratio ( OR) 3.5, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 2.5-4.9, adjusting for clinical covariates]. Independent correlates of ID in HF were Indian ethnicity ( OR 2.4 vs. Chinese, 95% CI 1.2-5.0), female gender ( OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.8), larger body mass index ( OR 1.05/unit increase, 95% CI 1.01-1.1) and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction ( OR 1.03/unit decrease, 95% CI 1.01-1.04). In a subset of 48 HF patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing, Tsat correlated with peak oxygen consumption (ρ = 0.53, P < 0.01), independent of baseline characteristics. The HF patients with Tsat <20% as well as anaemia showed the poorest event-free survival after adjusting for clinical covariates. Conclusions ID was highly prevalent and independently related to functional capacity and outcomes in our cohort. These findings suggest a pathophysiological role of ID in HF and support its importance as a therapeutic target in Southeast Asian patients with HF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]